Thread: Non-RM stigma
View Single Post
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008, 12:21 PM
rayhale rayhale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 152
Thanks: 69
Thanked 26 Times in 16 Posts
Laughs: 1
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

People who don’t go on missions because of medical reasons are also being treated like they aren’t faithful. I think that’s sad. I have an older brother that couldn’t go on a mission because of medical reasons, but it’s obvious that he couldn’t go. I waited for a year to go on my mission because my parents were worried about not being able to afford the $375 per month for me and for 6 months of my mission $ 750 for both me and my younger brother. My bishop told my parents not to worry, someone in the ward would help us out on our missions.
I agree that some people can be insensitive, but like a few posts have said, these people are trying to help you, going on a mission is a modern commandment for young men, it’s optional for young women, they have the option of either getting married or going on a mission, in theory that’s why they don’t go on a mission until 21, so they can go on dates with Returned Missionaries. It’s either that or the other explanation that makes less sense; that there will be an age gap between the 19-year-old male missionaries and the 21-year-old female missionaries.
Reply With Quote