View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2008, 01:30 PM
Moksha's Avatar
Moksha Moksha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 7,036
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,376 Times in 957 Posts
Laughs: 248
Laughs at 1,321 Times in 674 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale View Post
He thought me deceived, but i know he would have thought me twice deceived if i had told him the book was just sacred allegory.
Doesn't matter what some naysayer thinks of your faith, so why should you care if he believes you are doubly rather than singularly deceived? Sacred Allegory is by my definition, literature that contains symbolic truth. This truth by its very nature is worthwhile. No need to be ashamed of it. Besides by its same nature, it is proof against prevailing evidence that its origins are not historical. It keeps its believers from needing to forever come to its defense from attacks as to its origin.

Quote:
To me continuing to say the book is inspired by God would be empty propaganda.
Who says that such allegory cannot have had some divine inspiration or is in itself not pleasing to God?
__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."

Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Reply With Quote