You go in depth to call Jesus our Heavenly Father--and He was:just not in the same sense as you use it. In the Gospel of John, John calls Jesus the Word: quothe "In the begining was the Word, and the Word was with God...The same was in the begining with God." {John 1;1-2.} "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt umoung us..." {John 1;14.} In this reference it also reads in verse 3 that "all things was made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made." This means that God used Jesus as the Creator of all of us. This makes Him our Father. And once a father always a father. Thus he is the Eternal Father or Elohim. Does this mean that Jesus and his Father are one and the same? No!! They each retain their individual itentity, but that doesn't mean that Christ hasn't earned His title as the Messiah, the Son of God.
As for our, us Latter Day Saints, use of scriptures, we fully acknowledge that the Bible is only as correct as it is translated correctly {Read our Articles of Faith sometime.}. We also have a collection of translated passages from the Bible that Joseph Smith was instrumental in bringing to light.
As for what I'd put in the canon, I would only repeat that Revelation, either from God or his servants can decide what is sacred. Enoch is a very useful text, and despite the facts that there will be errors therein, deserves to be acknowledged as a text that inspired the ancient apostles to hold it in esteem and set the mood for religious furvor for centries after it was written.
|