View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2008, 10:12 PM
EarthyAngel EarthyAngel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 56
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 0
Got Laughs 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubaloth View Post
You should be fine. Once you even remotely "attack" (and I use that word loosly) then the bombs might come out. usually as long as people play by the rules, they should be fine.

Have you read much of Hugh Nibley's books. I don't think I have even read one completly through. But he does have a couple of interesting books. Two I would recomend looking into.
The Worlds and the Prophets
Also, Enoch the Prophet. I actually have this book, but have only only read parts here and there. I probably should actually sit down and read it.
I devoured Nibley's writings in my younger days.

It is just a bit too apologetic (meaning biased in favor of what he wishes to see) for my taste, now.

Yeah, I understand how you use "attack" loosely. Many see the "to question" the same as "to attack". Or even "to disagree" as "to attack".
Reply With Quote