Doesn't sound to me like much of an insinuation at all - more like an open stating of some rather damning facts. This guy produced a crappy DVD chock full of errors, unfounded irrational leaps, demonstrable lack of understanding relevant facts, and very troublesome claims about having recieved inspiration that would violate church doctrine on how revelation happens. FAIR wrote up all these problems and sent them to the author for comment, and the author has apparently refused to comment beyond "please don't tell the world about your problems with my DVD, it's my only source of income".
Is it really a "hit below the belt" to tell the world about the author's total lack of substantive response? As far as I can tell, his response lives
here at the Fairblog. There's lots of back and forthing between FAIR and Meldrum here, I suggest anyone interested read the comments.
LM
[edited as I discovered where the author is responding]