View Single Post
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:42 PM
SeattleTruthSeeker's Avatar
SeattleTruthSeeker SeattleTruthSeeker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: United States -
Age: 38
Posts: 216
Thanks: 36
Thanked 67 Times in 44 Posts
Laughs: 4
Laughs at 4 Times in 1 Post
Send a message via ICQ to SeattleTruthSeeker Send a message via AIM to SeattleTruthSeeker Send a message via MSN to SeattleTruthSeeker Send a message via Yahoo to SeattleTruthSeeker
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey View Post
I just go with the topics as they come up. Ben R.'s "good enough for me." statement about Elder Oaks and white shirts prompted my current wave of conversation. If you don't like it, don't participate.
Actually, the request for the validity of your sources is being asked. Why are you having a hard time stating where you received your sources?

Are you honestly afraid that by relinquishing your sources to be verified and checked out you are going to be proven in error of your argument? If this is the case, then actually the one who needs to remove themselves from the conversation is the one who started the conversation to begin with.

You made an accusation and now that the proof of that accusation is being requested, the source where this information is coming from is being requested and not granted shows the lack of honesty and ability to carry out an intellectual conversation to begin with.
Reply With Quote