View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2008, 06:41 PM
JohnBirchSociety's Avatar
JohnBirchSociety JohnBirchSociety is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: United States -
Age: 40
Posts: 565
Thanks: 181
Thanked 80 Times in 67 Posts
Laughs: 24
Laughs at 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traveler View Post
I know you have a hard time with certain concepts but nuclear power is not cheap and the cost of keeping our nuclear fuels safe as well as disposing of spent fuel is escalating faster than medical costs. Coal fired power generation is much cheaper than nuclear. I guess the nuclear idea is okay if you are willing to pay for it. The cheapest form of power currently is hydro-electrical but that also has its down side.

In theory nuclear fusion has the greatest promise but in over 50 years of research we have never been close to making that even kind of safe.

The Traveler
You're right, it is not cheap.

Of course, why, is the question.

It is not cheap because it is mired in lawsuits / regulations that don't allow new plants to be built and greatly hamper the potentials of the ones we do have.

I'm for regulation of nuclear plants.

I'm not for the insane litigation one must go through to even begin to have a chance to build one. Especially when the litigation is almost always without merit.
__________________
"Outside of a Dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside a Dog it's too dark to read." -Anonymous
Reply With Quote