View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-05-2008, 12:56 AM
YoungMormonRoyalist's Avatar
YoungMormonRoyalist YoungMormonRoyalist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 283
Thanks: 7
Thanked 95 Times in 67 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 18 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalShadow View Post
From the article:



Mormons went out of their way to support a bill that a lot of people strongly disagree with. The boycotts don't aim to supress political speech, the boycotts are political speech. If you take a stand against what people believe to be their civil rights you will end up getting people taking a stand against you. Why is that so difficult for people to understand? I support the LDS right to encourage people to vote for something, but I also support the right of people to peacefully express their disagreement and disgust at that decision.
Question: How much of a backlash would there have been if those for proposition 8 advertised and promoted a boycott of businesses, organizations, employees of those organizations and so on and so forth. No, not just a boycott of those in support of proposition 8, but with any business that employs and or affiliates with homosexuals in general. Because that is what is being called for. A boycott of Mormons, just because the majority of them supported prop 8.
Reply With Quote