View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2009, 10:09 PM
Just_A_Guy's Avatar
Just_A_Guy Just_A_Guy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,135 Times in 728 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 289 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Ah, I see your point re the end of Matthew 2 and "turning aside".

I'm still unconvinced that Matthew's account positively rules out Joseph's and/or Mary's origins as being Nazarene. All it really implies is that after returning from Egypt Joseph first thought to live somewhere in Judea. That doesn't mean Joseph and Mary were from there; it could just as easily mean that while in Egypt they determined that Jesus should be brought up in close proximity to Jerusalem.

That said, I'm not sure that the Church's official position is that the only factual errors in the Bible came through mistranslations. I'm very comfortable with the idea that the original authors of the Bible wrote the truth as they understood it, but that some portions of the Bible were written based on either misinterpretation of a revelation or else unreliable hearsay.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
JohnnyRudick (05-10-2009), Maxel (05-08-2009), Maya (05-09-2009), prospectmom (05-08-2009)