|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

10-22-2009, 06:36 PM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: United States -
Posts: 21,710
Thanks: 2,784
Thanked 4,093 Times in 2,544 Posts
Laughs: 1,653
Laughs at 3,835 Times in 1,677 Posts
|
|
No actual sex would apply to the law of chastity as well.
__________________
Please visit my new website I've adopted through TheMoreGoodFoundation. I just started it so it's very much a work in progress and will continue to be so.
www.ldsplace.com
|

10-22-2009, 06:39 PM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: United States -
Posts: 5,222
Thanks: 66
Thanked 1,424 Times in 784 Posts
Laughs: 15
Laughs at 551 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
So where is the line between affection and arousal?
Also what is defined as no sex?
I have heard the quote "Oral is moral". I believe it is not but I have heard it a justification by youth.
I feel that this might be better covered in Adult area but I think it is something that teens and young adults should consider. I feel that society has lowered the bar so much in this area that there is a lot of confusion among not only the youth but the parents of today's youth.
Ben Raines
__________________
"If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts; but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties." Sir Francis Bacon
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BenRaines For This Useful Post:
|
|

10-22-2009, 06:41 PM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: United States -
Posts: 21,710
Thanks: 2,784
Thanked 4,093 Times in 2,544 Posts
Laughs: 1,653
Laughs at 3,835 Times in 1,677 Posts
|
|
An example of affection would be: I gave you a hug on Sunday showing my affection for you. But it was nothing more than that.
I think we would need to define affection.
__________________
Please visit my new website I've adopted through TheMoreGoodFoundation. I just started it so it's very much a work in progress and will continue to be so.
www.ldsplace.com
|

10-22-2009, 07:05 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,137 Times in 730 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 290 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Justice Stewart's words (regarding pornography) seem fitting regarding the entire Law of Chastity:
Quote:
|
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of [activity] I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it . . .
|
Could it be that the Law of Chastity is analogous to the Word of Wisdom? That there is a certain "lowest common denominator" standard of behavior that applies to all of us, but that of some Church members God--through His Spirit--may reveal and require a higher (read: more stringent) standard of living?
__________________
Your lawyer in practice spends a considerable part of his life doing distasteful things for disagreeable people who must be satisfied, against an impossible time limit and with hourly interruptions, from other disagreeable people who want to derail the train; and for his blood, sweat, and tears he receives in the end a few unkind words to the effect that it might have been done better, and a protest at the size of his fee.
--William L. Prosser
|

10-22-2009, 07:33 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,080
Thanks: 52
Thanked 1,296 Times in 636 Posts
Laughs: 32
Laughs at 363 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Strongly tied to the sacred, private parts of the body are powerful emotions intended to be used within the covenant of marriage between a man and woman in ways that are appropriate and acceptable to them both. They are an important part of the love and trust that bond a husband and wife together and prepare them for the responsibilities of a family. They bring the blessing of children. These emotions are not to be stimulated or used for personal gratification outside of the covenant of marriage. Do not touch the private, sacred parts of another person's body to stimulate those emotions. Do not allow anyone to do that with you, with or without clothing. Do not arouse those emotions in your own body. These things are wrong. Do not do them (Richard G. Scott, "The Power of Righteousness," Conference, October 1988).
|
Any action that causes a person to be sexually aroused through stimulation of his or her sex organs is a violation of the Law of Chastity. It doesn't get much simpler than that. If two people can have oral sex without becoming sexually aroused, then more power to them. If they can have sexual intercourse without being sexually aroused, then I guess that it wouldn't be sinful under this definition--it also wouldn't be fun.
If it makes you horny, then it's best you scorn it.
|

10-22-2009, 07:45 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 135
Thanks: 114
Thanked 62 Times in 35 Posts
Laughs: 7
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I believe the Law of Chasity is very personal, as people are aroused by different stimuli. If an activity causes someone to think or fantasize about either wholly inappropriate or extramarital affairs they should not engage in that activity. Personally, I feel anything more than a quick, moderate kiss should not happen between unmarried people. I always consider petting as beyond the boundaries for singles. That's my interpretation.
|

10-23-2009, 06:09 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,250
Thanks: 435
Thanked 493 Times in 286 Posts
Laughs: 57
Laughs at 246 Times in 126 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenRaines
So based on a couple of posts then anything except for actual sex act is within the boundary of law of chastity?
Ben Raines
|
It isn't about "the letter" but the "spirit". Actual acts will vary based on different factors. Like your highschool example different things affect different people differently. Things that inspire lust in a 16 year old kid with hormones going nuts might be nothing to a 28 yearold single, or 50 year old widower.
__________________
"There are not enough general authorities to do all the thinking for the membership of the church." J. Golden Kimball
|

10-23-2009, 06:17 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,785
Thanks: 294
Thanked 957 Times in 518 Posts
Laughs: 57
Laughs at 550 Times in 248 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenRaines
Also what is defined as no sex?
I have heard the quote "Oral is moral". I believe it is not but I have heard it a justification by youth.
Ben Raines
|
Curse you, Raines. I can't be laughing out loud at work!
I can't even understand how this would be a justification. My opinion? If it's something you can't do in public with lots of people watching, it's against the law of chastity.
I'm in to public displays of affection, however, so it's an easy distinction for me. If you're embarassed by holding hands in public? You can probably go farther than that.
|

10-23-2009, 08:36 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 328
Thanks: 75
Thanked 194 Times in 109 Posts
Laughs: 14
Laughs at 28 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
I remember one of my past bishops saying, "Oral sex, is it sex? There is a reason it is called Oral sex, and that is because it is sex."
My husband and I discussed this a little while ago when we were reading "The Miracle of Forgiveness" together. Pres. Kimball mentions things like "petting" and "necking". Both of us admitted that when we were teens we had no idea what that meant. He even said that he thought necking involved rubbing your necks together, but he saw no problem with giving hickeys (because he didn't know that was actually necking). I think there is a lot of terminology that is thrown around that is never explained. People are so careful to tiptoe around the subject and use vague terminology that if you aren't familiar with the term you may not know what they are talking about. For example, as a teen I didn't really know what constituted masterbation. It was something I really had to research before I realized what really defined it.
For me I think outside of marriage the LoC (Law of Chasity) constitutes holding hands, brief kisses, hugging. I think it is best not to put yourself in a situation where you might be tempted to do something you will regret later. Group dates and such would be best. This is all coming from someone who never did any of this, I can only say from experience that being alone with someone of the opposite sex can lead to problems. Be careful.
Inside of marriage I think that the LoC constitutes staying faithful to your spouse. This means that you should keep yourself in check when it comes to noticing people of the opposite sex who are not your spouse. Even friendships can be dangerous. My parents always lived by the rule of only having friends who were of the same sex. So my dad would have male friends and my mom would have female friends. Keeping your friendships gender based keeps you from problems. Also, make a point once you are married to never be alone with someone of the opposite sex (other than your spouse) don't even give yourself the opportunity for something to go wrong.
|

10-23-2009, 08:53 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 203 Times in 152 Posts
Laughs: 54
Laughs at 136 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
My favorite 'rules' as a single were that kisses stay on the lips and that hands stay off of any areas that would be covered by a bathing suit (not a bikini).
Now married we are striving to have any sexual activity and thoughts to only be with our spouse. Oh and as sexual thoughts go, this doesn't mean I can have any fantasy I want as long as I put hubby in the main role, but if I want to think up something fun to do later that day with him, that is ok and encouraged.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 AM.
|