|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

03-06-2009, 07:27 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 310 Times in 230 Posts
Laughs: 22
Laughs at 62 Times in 38 Posts
|
|
Kinda sad thing happened the other day. I was at the airport and I had been discussing our church with a woman who is very interested in the LDS faith. She even asked where there was a ward in our area. She also is a book addict and always buys a bunch of them when traveling. She bought Jessop's book in the bookstore. Wonder if she will still be as interested in the LDS faith as she has been.
People just don't seem to understand the concept of cost-benefit. The cost of allowing the FLDS church, and other polygamists, to live in peace is fairly small. The benefit of allowing a libertarian approach is that they will merely be a blip on the radar screen in regards to news.
The cost of going after these people is that the majority of the public will associate them with the LDS and the missionary effort will suffer. Who knows how many people have been turned off to the Church both for the issue of polygamy as well as the issue of wondering why the LDS public doesn't just say polygamy is okay but it's not something our church supports living at this time?
Yeah, the sate of Utah nailed a fairly decent man (Tom Green) for being a polygamist and reaped a wirlwind of negative publicity for the LDS Church. Just great!
|

03-06-2009, 02:52 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,137 Times in 730 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 290 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
I'm conflicted on Warren Jeffs.
We keep getting more and more information that paints him in an unflattering light--the Trib ran an article on him this week that incorporated material from his recent journals that have been made public. The man is no Joseph Smith.
On the other hand, about a year ago I had a chance to meet with a member of Jeffs' Utah legal defense team in the trial involving Elissa Wall-Steed. I came away from the meeting convinced that: a) Wall's testimony was suspect; b) even if what she said was true Jeffs' involvement in the affair was minimal; c) the statutory interpretations under which Jeffs was convicted were a stretch; and d) the jury pool was very probably tainted.
And I wonder why the DA couldn't find a more substantial charge to bring.
|

03-06-2009, 10:52 PM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: United States -
Posts: 21,692
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 4,091 Times in 2,542 Posts
Laughs: 1,653
Laughs at 3,834 Times in 1,677 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Yeah, the sate of Utah nailed a fairly decent man (Tom Green) for being a polygamist and reaped a wirlwind of negative publicity for the LDS Church. Just great!
|
Fairly decent man? He was convicted of non support, also of raping a child who was later to be made his wife. That's called decent?
__________________
Please visit my new website I've adopted through TheMoreGoodFoundation. I just started it so it's very much a work in progress and will continue to be so.
www.ldsplace.com
|

03-06-2009, 11:43 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 241
Thanks: 18
Thanked 83 Times in 57 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 18 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pam
Fairly decent man? He was convicted of non support, also of raping a child who was later to be made his wife. That's called decent?
|
Get your facts straight please...
The non-support issue came from welfare they collected after their home burnt down and they lost a child.
The wife he "raped", requested the marriage (insisted, as a matter of fact) and was his biggest supporter throughout the whole trial.
I am no fan of polygamy, but really folks, be decent and learn the whole story about things before condemning people.
|

03-07-2009, 12:14 AM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: United States -
Posts: 21,692
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 4,091 Times in 2,542 Posts
Laughs: 1,653
Laughs at 3,834 Times in 1,677 Posts
|
|
First of all I didn't say she was forced to be his wife...I said she was made his wife.
Whether she requested it or not..it is still rape of a 13 year old girl. During his trial he was asked to name all of his 30-33 children (depending on what article you read). He got very confused trying to remember the names of all them. I specifically remember that on the news broadcasts during his trial and thought..what?
He was convicted of criminal non support. Does it matter how or why? It was still criminal non support.
So yes I think I have some of my facts straight thank you very much.
__________________
Please visit my new website I've adopted through TheMoreGoodFoundation. I just started it so it's very much a work in progress and will continue to be so.
www.ldsplace.com
Last edited by pam; 03-07-2009 at 12:20 AM.
|

03-07-2009, 12:44 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 241
Thanks: 18
Thanked 83 Times in 57 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 18 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pam
First of all I didn't say she was forced to be his wife...I said she was made his wife.
Whether she requested it or not..it is still rape of a 13 year old girl. During his trial he was asked to name all of his 30-33 children (depending on what article you read). He got very confused trying to remember the names of all them. I specifically remember that on the news broadcasts during his trial and thought..what?
He was convicted of criminal non support. Does it matter how or why? It was still criminal non support.
So yes I think I have some of my facts straight thank you very much.
|
"Does it matter how or why?"???? Yes! Their house burnt down and a child died. What else is welfare for? Do you really hate polygamists so much that you are devoid of mercy?
This is sad. Nothing has caused me more disappointment in members of the LDS church then their completely unfeeling attitudes towards Fundamentalist Mormons. It actually physically hurts my heart to see the hatred and bias.
|

03-07-2009, 07:49 AM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 15,588
Thanks: 970
Thanked 1,187 Times in 853 Posts
Laughs: 1,568
Laughs at 1,174 Times in 709 Posts
|
|
Are we now saying he did not rape his wife????....I guess I am confused...
__________________
As Long As I Am Here......It Doesn't Matter Where Here Is.....
All great change in America begins at the dinner table......Ronald Reagan
Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.....Ronald Reagan
|

03-07-2009, 09:20 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 241
Thanks: 18
Thanked 83 Times in 57 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 18 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Palerider
Are we now saying he did not rape his wife????....I guess I am confused...
|
Tom Green didn't rape anybody. Rape is to have sex with someone against their will. As testified to in the trial, the marriage, and consummation of such, was done at the young woman's insistence.
And the time of the trial he had been married to the young woman going on 15 years or so and she is the "Sarah" wife (ie head wife).
The sex act took place in Mexico, so it didn't even fall within Utah jurisdiction, but you can do anything with a LDS jury and a polygamist "criminal".
Once again, I am no believer in polygamy and feel it's practice is against God's perfect will. But I do believe in justice, and Tom Green's conviction was not just.
|

03-07-2009, 09:38 AM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Principe
Posts: 5,307
Thanks: 716
Thanked 1,395 Times in 803 Posts
Laughs: 329
Laughs at 655 Times in 337 Posts
|
|
So, in your book if a 35 year-old man has sex with a 15 year-old girl, it's not rape? Not even statutory rape? News to me. I would imagine that most US states and their citizens would disagree with that view.
__________________
Pressure: It can turn a lump of coal into a flawless diamond, or an average person into a perfect basketcase.
-from despair.com
Except for ending slavery, fascism, nazism, & communism, WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING!
From protestwarrior.com
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to john doe For This Useful Post:
|
|

03-07-2009, 09:59 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 241
Thanks: 18
Thanked 83 Times in 57 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 18 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by john doe
So, in your book if a 35 year-old man has sex with a 15 year-old girl, it's not rape? Not even statutory rape? News to me. I would imagine that most US states and their citizens would disagree with that view.
|
I guess that makes Joseph a rapist.
You can't have one standard for those you revere and another one for those you despise. If you condemn Tom Green for marrying the girl you must condemn Joseph Smith for marrying several underage girls.
How old was Mary was she was impregnated with the Messiah? Is God a rapist?
Are you all really so blinded by hatred that justice has escaped your reasoning?
Last edited by Book_of_Mormon_Warrior; 03-07-2009 at 10:28 AM.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 PM.
|