|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

03-05-2009, 11:50 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: United States -
Posts: 16,692
Thanks: 554
Thanked 698 Times in 571 Posts
Laughs: 761
Laughs at 739 Times in 479 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxel
I think I can.

Often, anti-Mormons will accuse us of believing in a 'different' Jesus than the one traditional Christians worship.
From my experience, this accusation arises from one (or more) of two main sources:
1) The Book of Mormon is subtitled 'another testament of Christ'. Somehow, some antis believe that the meaning of the phrase 'another testament of Christ' actually resembles the meaning given by the wording 'a testament of another Christ', or some similar phrasing. In this case, the anti-Mormon forces the term 'another' to modify 'Christ', when it clearly modifies 'testament'.
2) We believe in doctrine about Christ (the Godhead) that disagrees with traditional Christian thinking (the Trinity). Apparently those who believe this believe that the doctrines espoused by traditional Christianity are set forth so solidly in the Bible that any other interpretation is 'of another spirit' or 'of another Gospel' ( 2 Cor. 11:4). In this case, the anti-Mormon is simply closing his/her eyes to the fact that many acclaimed and widely used Bible dictionaries (including the Harper's Bible Dictionary) plainly state that the complete doctrine of the Trinity is not to be found in the Bible itself, but is a post-biblical doctrine decided upon in the early Christian councils.
Both points don't hold up to honest scrutiny. The 'Mormons believe in a different Christ' is, for a lack of a better term, the unlearned man's anti-Mormon argument. Here, Just_A_Guy was referencing that common accusation in a facetious response to LittleNipper's comment '[a]nd if it is true, why do so many seem to be harsh in their dealings with others professing to be believers?'

|
also because Gordon Hinkley said it Maxel.
__________________
God is God, God likes to be God & God is good at being God so let Him do it.
|

03-05-2009, 11:53 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: United States -
Posts: 16,692
Thanks: 554
Thanked 698 Times in 571 Posts
Laughs: 761
Laughs at 739 Times in 479 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyB
I apologize for the pendantry....but some of the posters have used plurals to paraphrase the verse. It is "fruit is". There is only one fruit. I have heard people make an issue out of that, I don't know if it makes that big a difference but quoting scripture acurately never hurt anyone.
|
Yes it is "fruit" so what does that mean? Is the fruit "love" and then the others are just descriptors of what love is through joy, peace, patience, kindness, etc.?
__________________
God is God, God likes to be God & God is good at being God so let Him do it.
|

03-06-2009, 12:14 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 40
Posts: 457
Thanks: 39
Thanked 76 Times in 54 Posts
Laughs: 6
Laughs at 23 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Are you wanting a greek grammar analysis! My guess would be that it is something like saying.....The grand canyon is majestic, awesome, wonderful and breathtaking. Or to really put it in LDS terms...The fruit of the LDS church is wholsomeness, purity, holiness, dedication.
(The author of the preceeding comment wishes to express that it was an example and not an expression of his personal opinion or the the truthfulness of the statement or not.)
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AnthonyB For This Useful Post:
|
|

03-06-2009, 09:44 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyB
I apologize for the pendantry....but some of the posters have used plurals to paraphrase the verse. It is "fruit is". There is only one fruit. I have heard people make an issue out of that, I don't know if it makes that big a difference but quoting scripture accurately never hurt anyone.
|
Well a tree will bring forth fruit, and there is a basket of fruit. If one speaks of various fruit, one might be okay in saying fruits. Each attribute of christian growth might be considered a fruit in it's own right. Where one quotes a verse verbatum, it should be as written, but a title is only a title...
|

03-06-2009, 09:47 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,819
Thanks: 1,181
Thanked 1,740 Times in 1,015 Posts
Laughs: 286
Laughs at 439 Times in 202 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T
also because Gordon Hinkley said it Maxel.
|
You should read the whole quote in context, Dr. T........
__________________
We've got nothing to fear...but fear itself?
Not pain, not failure, not fatal tragedy?
Not the faulty units in this mad machinery?
Not the broken contacts in emotional chemistry?
|

03-06-2009, 01:52 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,957
Thanks: 3,084
Thanked 814 Times in 498 Posts
Laughs: 953
Laughs at 230 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T
also because Gordon Hinkley said it Maxel.
|
I can't find any quote of his that, when read in context, points to us worshiping any Jesus other than the one born in Jerusalem of the virgin Mary.
In the argument, anti-Mormons claim we worship a Jesus other than the one spoken about in the New Testament- the one born of the virgin Mary. They seek to brand us wholly un-Christian because we supposedly worship another Jesus in history.
Any remarks about the LDS worshiping 'another' Jesus that has come from the mouths of the LDS prophets have been in relation to the doctrine and view of Jesus that we maintain. We believe Jesus is fundamentally different, in some ways, than traditional Christians do. However, that does not mean we worship a Jesus different than the one we read about in the New Testament.
Thank you for pointing that out, Dr T. I hadn't remembered that when I posted. Again, we see that one has to take the quote out of context for the anti-Mormon's desired goal to be accomplished. Again, the argument doesn't hold up to honest scrutiny.
__________________
2 Nephi 2:25: Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy.
2 Nephi 25:23, 26: For we labor diligently... to believe in Christ, and to be reconciled to God; for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do... And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins.
|

03-07-2009, 03:12 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 367
Thanks: 19
Thanked 105 Times in 61 Posts
Laughs: 11
Laughs at 67 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleNipper
My question is if the above is still true or was this added by those wishing to fool believers? And if it is true, why do so many seem to be harsh in their dealings with others professing to be believers?
|
I think that there are many more gifts of the Spirit than what you listed. Just as there is no list of the ways in which we may sin, there is no list of the gifts we may be given by our Father in Heaven. We only know of some of these gifts. I noticed that your list also misses out other manifestations of the Spirit,such as Revelation, Speaking/Interpretation of Tongues, Healing, etc.
We are all imperfect, and falter. Not all will receive all these gifts. When Jesus cleansed the Temple, was he meek, gentle, or peaceful?
|

03-07-2009, 03:27 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,945
Thanks: 3,060
Thanked 2,529 Times in 1,833 Posts
Laughs: 494
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
|
|
Littledipper, in Mosiah chapter 4 verse 13 it reads: "And ye will not have a mind to injure one another, but to live peaceably, and to render to every man according to that which is his due."
What follows is not a list of do's and don'ts on the part of King Benjamin but rather a characterization of individuals and families who have been born of the Spirit. To have the Lord's Spirit is to do the things that the Lord would do; conversely, those possessed of an evil spirit will be the perpetrators of evil deeds. Parents are admonished to teach their children to love and serve each other. Such actions will be attended by the Spirit of the Lord, whereas to fight and quarrel is to befriend the spirit of the evil one.
"..Not have a mind to injure one another..." Paul taught the Galatians that the fruits of the Spirit are "love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance." Those who live in the Spirit also walk in that Spirit; having the mind of Christ, their Master, they have no disposition to do other than aid and bless one another. (Galatians 5:22-23; 1 Corinthians 2:16; D&C 11:12.)
Paul and King Benjamin had common ground on this subject - FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT.
__________________
"Moving Forward...together!"
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hemidakota For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 AM.
|