Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > Gospel Boards > Christian Beliefs Board
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2009, 05:38 PM
Faded's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 517
Thanks: 125
Thanked 427 Times in 236 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 36 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Jonathan, I must apologize. I have every intention of responding, but until further notice, I'm going to have very limited access to the Internet. So I will respond when I get a chance.

I should definitely clarify:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faded;
"1.) Personal Study: There are not enough people who deign
to call themselves Christians who never bother to study for themselves,"

If you rephrased that as either "There are not enough people who deign
to call themselves Christians who bother to study for themselves", or
"There are too many people who ..." I'd agree with it. (The rephrasing
would also be more congruent with the rest of the paragraph.
You are absolutely correct. This was an editing typo. What I intended was:
"Personal Studay: There are not enough people who deign to call themselves Christians who actually bother to study the Scriptures for themselves."

The tragedy is that most "Christians" will rely on someone else to learn the Bible on their behalf, so they don't have to. They will rely on someone else to get to know God very well on their behalf, so they don't have to. They will rely on someone else to learn the doctrines and teaching of God and Christ, so they don't have to. This unequal relationship and unequal responsibility is truly saddening. I would be curious how you think this problem can be solved.
__________________
  • For every rule there is an exception <-- and there's exceptions to that rule too.
  • If you will not be God's children, you will be his tools.
  • Be pretty if you are, be witty if you can, but be cheerful if it kills you!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Faded For This Useful Post:
Islander (06-03-2009)
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2009, 04:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faded;
They will rely on someone else to learn the doctrines and teaching of God and Christ, so they don't have to. This unequal relationship and unequal responsibility is truly saddening. I would be curious how you think this problem can be solved.
Short of lining them up against a wall, facing a firing squad, for not studying the Bible for themselves?

jonathon
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 06-06-2009, 09:31 PM
AnthonyB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 40
Posts: 453
Thanks: 39
Thanked 76 Times in 54 Posts
Laughs: 6
Laughs at 23 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Erik,

So which baptism is Eph 4:5 talking of when it says there is "one" baptism?
There is no textual problems in the text. (Well a very small issue at the end of verse 6)

"One body and one spirit, just as also you were called in one faith when you were called.
One lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and father to all, who [is] near all and through all and in all."

I can't think you'd want to affirm there is two of any of the others, so why decide on two baptisms?

Clearly the writers of Nicea saw one baptism which did both of what your two baptisms do.

I could you give a page of quotes from Tertullian, Justin Martyr, Augustine, Aquinas and Luther on the topic but I'll quote Zwingli himself....."In this matter of baptism all the doctors have been in error from the time of the apsotles."

So on what basis do you decide on two baptisms? You have IMHO scripture, creed and the full weight of church tradition for 1500 years against you.

If your asking what this has got to do with your original post, in part it is where I think the reformation got it wrong.

Last edited by AnthonyB; 06-06-2009 at 09:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AnthonyB For This Useful Post:
ErikJohnson (06-07-2009)
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2009, 07:25 PM
ErikJohnson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 130
Thanks: 14
Thanked 20 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyB View Post
Erik,

So which baptism is Eph 4:5 talking of when it says there is "one" baptism?
There is no textual problems in the text. (Well a very small issue at the end of verse 6)

"One body and one spirit, just as also you were called in one faith when you were called.
One lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and father to all, who [is] near all and through all and in all."

I can't think you'd want to affirm there is two of any of the others, so why decide on two baptisms?

Clearly the writers of Nicea saw one baptism which did both of what your two baptisms do.

I could you give a page of quotes from Tertullian, Justin Martyr, Augustine, Aquinas and Luther on the topic but I'll quote Zwingli himself....."In this matter of baptism all the doctors have been in error from the time of the apsotles."

So on what basis do you decide on two baptisms? You have IMHO scripture, creed and the full weight of church tradition for 1500 years against you.

If your asking what this has got to do with your original post, in part it is where I think the reformation got it wrong.
Hey AnthonyB--

I appreciate your tenacity and recognize this is a core issue for you. Perhaps I would have done better to characterize spiritual baptism as regeneration (whether Zwingli would concur with this—I have no idea).

I look to my own experience when I became a Christian on the evening of June 1, 2005. At that moment in time, God gave me a new heart and a radically new direction. Had I died later that evening, I have no doubt I would have gone to be with Jesus. Yet I wasn't physically baptized until ~ 2 months later. They were separate, though certainly related events. (Obviously I'm ignoring my LDS baptism at age 8. My motivation back then was to please my parents and the other adults in the old Renton 4th Ward. I had no idea who Jesus really was or what He had accomplished for me.)

And when I look to Scripture, I see a distinction been the physical act of washing and regeneration by the Holy Spirit. (1 Peter 3:21, Mark 1:8; Romans 6:4; Colossians 2:12). That is what I meant by spirtual baptism.

Rather than continue to discuss it here--my suggestion is that you open a thread on the subject of Baptism, and what it means to LDS and Christians alike (this is an LDS hosted forum, after all).

Regards,

--Erik
__________________


"For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."

--1 Corinthians 1:18
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2009, 09:20 PM
AnthonyB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 40
Posts: 453
Thanks: 39
Thanked 76 Times in 54 Posts
Laughs: 6
Laughs at 23 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Erik,

It isn't me that made a big deal of baptism, its Jesus in the "Great Commission" Matt 28:18-20 and Mark 16:16, Peter in Acts 2:38 etc....

Taking the 1st verse above 1 Pet 3:21, people clearly don't take the time to read 1 Pet 3:20. The symbolism mentioned in the verse is that of Noah's flood waters pointing to our baptism, not our baptism pointing to our real salvation sometime else. If Ephesians really says there is only 1 baptism, then Rom 6:4 and Col 2:12 make a very different case. As for Mark 1:18 it contrasts John's baptism to Christian baptism, which is why the disciples who had already had John's baptism were rebaptised in Acts (in order to receive the Holy Spirit.)

My personal experience is not greatly different from yours but if scripture and experience don't match, then for me its an issue. I see baptism as the central point of the salvation process, what happens before is God in his graciousness takes the wil of obedience to baptism somehow in lieu of the act and bestows before the real event occurs.

Anyway I will desist and stop pestering you, and rather rejoice that you have obeyed Jesus command.

Last edited by AnthonyB; 06-07-2009 at 09:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.