|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|

08-06-2008, 04:03 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 309 Times in 229 Posts
Laughs: 22
Got Laughs 61 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
John Stossel on polygamy.
Quote:
"Texas authorities on Tuesday indicted the leader of a polygamous sect ... on charges of felony sexual assault on a minor, the first criminal charges to stem from a massive raid on the group's West Texas compound," the Los Angeles Times reported last week.
The Associated Press and other press outlets used similar words: "indicted polygamist sect leader Warren Jeffs ... charges of felony sexual assault of a child."
Straightforward reporting? In my "20/20" special "Sex in America," polygamy activist Mark Henkel said no, it's an ignorant distortion.
"The media kept saying, 'Polygamist leader, polygamist leader,'" Mr. Henkel told me. "But the case actually involved incest and arranged marriage of a girl with her 19-year-old cousin. There wasn't anything [that] had to do with polygamy. [Mr. Jeffs] wasn't called an incest leader. He wasn't called an underage-marriage leader. He was called a polygamist leader."
Mr. Henkel and his Web site, TruthBearer, campaign against the press and others who lump criminals like Mr. Jeffs with all polygamy.
Mr. Henkel won't disclose his own family situation. In Maine, where he lives, even purporting to have more than one wife is against the law. Mr. Henkel complains that American laws are hypocritical.
...
"If they're saying that's immoral, they're calling the greatest heroes in the Bible ... immoral! ... Saying that Abraham, with his three wives, was immoral. Jacob had four wives. David had seven known named wives before Bathsheba."
Mr. Ben-Israel calls plural marriage a civil-rights issue. "Who is this government that's in somebody's bedroom? ... It was illegal for me to marry a white woman at one time. ... It was illegal for me to vote at one time. And if I had accepted somebody else's definition of what was right and wrong, I would still be riding in the back of the bus.
"We're not saying this is for everybody. Everybody don't like football and basketball or tennis. But those who do ought to be free to do this."
|
How Many Wives Is Too Many? - July 30, 2008 - The New York Sun
Stossel, as usual, cuts through the propaganda, media distortions, and political grandstanding by hypocrits (Note: Harry Reid) and presents a very thoughtful investigation into polygamy. Wish there were more journalists like him.
|

08-06-2008, 08:42 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 47
Thanked 1,059 Times in 536 Posts
Laughs: 28
Got Laughs 332 Times in 143 Posts
|
|
Quote:
"Who is this government that's in somebody's bedroom? ... It was illegal for me to marry a white woman at one time. ... It was illegal for me to vote at one time. And if I had accepted somebody else's definition of what was right and wrong, I would still be riding in the back of the bus.
"We're not saying this is for everybody. Everybody don't like football and basketball or tennis. But those who do ought to be free to do this."
|
Are you supporting this quote?
|

08-06-2008, 09:45 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 949
Thanks: 271
Thanked 306 Times in 199 Posts
Laughs: 28
Got Laughs 133 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
stossels my hero
|

08-06-2008, 09:50 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,262
Thanks: 225
Thanked 656 Times in 348 Posts
Laughs: 36
Got Laughs 400 Times in 172 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError
Are you supporting this quote?
|
I am, Moe. I am very sincerely supporting this quote. I know what you're saying because I've read the OP's posts as well.
Good on you, Moe.
|

08-06-2008, 09:54 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 4,488
Thanks: 2,031
Thanked 2,143 Times in 1,192 Posts
Laughs: 270
Got Laughs 401 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
I think that it should be ok for this kind of religious practice to be argued in the halls of justice. BUT, I do think that any participant should be at least 18 and that the government should be able to intervene if any abuse is happening. They should have to follow and be subject to the law in this regard just like everybody else. In this Texas case, I feel for the innocent, but don't wish to see culture of child molestation enabled or overlooked.
|

08-06-2008, 01:37 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 309 Times in 229 Posts
Laughs: 22
Got Laughs 61 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misshalfway
I think that it should be ok for this kind of religious practice to be argued in the halls of justice. BUT, I do think that any participant should be at least 18 and that the government should be able to intervene if any abuse is happening. They should have to follow and be subject to the law in this regard just like everybody else. In this Texas case, I feel for the innocent, but don't wish to see culture of child molestation enabled or overlooked.
|
I agree on the minimum age for entering into a polygamist marriage being 18. Also, I believe that the same laws should apply to polygamists as to monogamists.
|

08-06-2008, 01:50 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 47
Thanked 1,059 Times in 536 Posts
Laughs: 28
Got Laughs 332 Times in 143 Posts
|
|
Not answering my question? What's up with that?
Quote:
Quote:
"Who is this government that's in somebody's bedroom? ... It was illegal for me to marry a white woman at one time. ... It was illegal for me to vote at one time. And if I had accepted somebody else's definition of what was right and wrong, I would still be riding in the back of the bus.
"We're not saying this is for everybody. Everybody don't like football and basketball or tennis. But those who do ought to be free to do this."
|
Are you supporting this quote?
|
|

08-06-2008, 02:26 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 309 Times in 229 Posts
Laughs: 22
Got Laughs 61 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError
Not answering my question? What's up with that?
|
Question? The guy made a statement and from what I understand he's correct. So what's the problem?
|

08-07-2008, 01:56 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 47
Thanked 1,059 Times in 536 Posts
Laughs: 28
Got Laughs 332 Times in 143 Posts
|
|
Just seems a little odd to complain about government in our bedrooms regarding plural marriage and the cry foul over government in our bedrooms regarding gay marriage.
|

08-07-2008, 02:06 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 309 Times in 229 Posts
Laughs: 22
Got Laughs 61 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError
Just seems a little odd to complain about government in our bedrooms regarding plural marriage and the cry foul over government in our bedrooms regarding gay marriage.
|
Yet here you bring up the irony -- homosexual sex was a criminal offense until after WW2 (and remained so in half the states in the US until the Supreme Court ruling a few years ago invalidating Texas' anti-sodomy laws). So homosexual actions are legal, and just about every type of heterosexual adultery and fornication are legal, but if a group of people want to live in a polygamist family that's considered wrong?
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.
|