Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > General Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 04:03 AM
Fiannan's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 309 Times in 229 Posts
Laughs: 22
Got Laughs 61 Times in 37 Posts
Default John Stossel on polygamy.

Quote:
"Texas authorities on Tuesday indicted the leader of a polygamous sect ... on charges of felony sexual assault on a minor, the first criminal charges to stem from a massive raid on the group's West Texas compound," the Los Angeles Times reported last week.
The Associated Press and other press outlets used similar words: "indicted polygamist sect leader Warren Jeffs ... charges of felony sexual assault of a child."
Straightforward reporting? In my "20/20" special "Sex in America," polygamy activist Mark Henkel said no, it's an ignorant distortion.
"The media kept saying, 'Polygamist leader, polygamist leader,'" Mr. Henkel told me. "But the case actually involved incest and arranged marriage of a girl with her 19-year-old cousin. There wasn't anything [that] had to do with polygamy. [Mr. Jeffs] wasn't called an incest leader. He wasn't called an underage-marriage leader. He was called a polygamist leader."
Mr. Henkel and his Web site, TruthBearer, campaign against the press and others who lump criminals like Mr. Jeffs with all polygamy.
Mr. Henkel won't disclose his own family situation. In Maine, where he lives, even purporting to have more than one wife is against the law. Mr. Henkel complains that American laws are hypocritical.

...

"If they're saying that's immoral, they're calling the greatest heroes in the Bible ... immoral! ... Saying that Abraham, with his three wives, was immoral. Jacob had four wives. David had seven known named wives before Bathsheba."
Mr. Ben-Israel calls plural marriage a civil-rights issue. "Who is this government that's in somebody's bedroom? ... It was illegal for me to marry a white woman at one time. ... It was illegal for me to vote at one time. And if I had accepted somebody else's definition of what was right and wrong, I would still be riding in the back of the bus.
"We're not saying this is for everybody. Everybody don't like football and basketball or tennis. But those who do ought to be free to do this."
How Many Wives Is Too Many? - July 30, 2008 - The New York Sun

Stossel, as usual, cuts through the propaganda, media distortions, and political grandstanding by hypocrits (Note: Harry Reid) and presents a very thoughtful investigation into polygamy. Wish there were more journalists like him.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 08:42 AM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 47
Thanked 1,059 Times in 536 Posts
Laughs: 28
Got Laughs 332 Times in 143 Posts
Default

Quote:
"Who is this government that's in somebody's bedroom? ... It was illegal for me to marry a white woman at one time. ... It was illegal for me to vote at one time. And if I had accepted somebody else's definition of what was right and wrong, I would still be riding in the back of the bus.
"We're not saying this is for everybody. Everybody don't like football and basketball or tennis. But those who do ought to be free to do this."
Are you supporting this quote?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 09:45 AM
hordak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 949
Thanks: 271
Thanked 306 Times in 199 Posts
Laughs: 28
Got Laughs 133 Times in 71 Posts
Default

stossels my hero
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 09:50 AM
FunkyTown's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,262
Thanks: 225
Thanked 656 Times in 348 Posts
Laughs: 36
Got Laughs 400 Times in 172 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError View Post
Are you supporting this quote?
I am, Moe. I am very sincerely supporting this quote. I know what you're saying because I've read the OP's posts as well.

Good on you, Moe.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 09:54 AM
Misshalfway's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 4,488
Thanks: 2,031
Thanked 2,143 Times in 1,192 Posts
Laughs: 270
Got Laughs 401 Times in 184 Posts
Default

I think that it should be ok for this kind of religious practice to be argued in the halls of justice. BUT, I do think that any participant should be at least 18 and that the government should be able to intervene if any abuse is happening. They should have to follow and be subject to the law in this regard just like everybody else. In this Texas case, I feel for the innocent, but don't wish to see culture of child molestation enabled or overlooked.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 01:37 PM
Fiannan's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 309 Times in 229 Posts
Laughs: 22
Got Laughs 61 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Misshalfway View Post
I think that it should be ok for this kind of religious practice to be argued in the halls of justice. BUT, I do think that any participant should be at least 18 and that the government should be able to intervene if any abuse is happening. They should have to follow and be subject to the law in this regard just like everybody else. In this Texas case, I feel for the innocent, but don't wish to see culture of child molestation enabled or overlooked.
I agree on the minimum age for entering into a polygamist marriage being 18. Also, I believe that the same laws should apply to polygamists as to monogamists.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 01:50 PM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 47
Thanked 1,059 Times in 536 Posts
Laughs: 28
Got Laughs 332 Times in 143 Posts
Default

Not answering my question? What's up with that?


Quote:
Quote:
"Who is this government that's in somebody's bedroom? ... It was illegal for me to marry a white woman at one time. ... It was illegal for me to vote at one time. And if I had accepted somebody else's definition of what was right and wrong, I would still be riding in the back of the bus.
"We're not saying this is for everybody. Everybody don't like football and basketball or tennis. But those who do ought to be free to do this."
Are you supporting this quote?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 02:26 PM
Fiannan's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 309 Times in 229 Posts
Laughs: 22
Got Laughs 61 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError View Post
Not answering my question? What's up with that?
Question? The guy made a statement and from what I understand he's correct. So what's the problem?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2008, 01:56 AM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 47
Thanked 1,059 Times in 536 Posts
Laughs: 28
Got Laughs 332 Times in 143 Posts
Default

Just seems a little odd to complain about government in our bedrooms regarding plural marriage and the cry foul over government in our bedrooms regarding gay marriage.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2008, 02:06 AM
Fiannan's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 141
Thanked 309 Times in 229 Posts
Laughs: 22
Got Laughs 61 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError View Post
Just seems a little odd to complain about government in our bedrooms regarding plural marriage and the cry foul over government in our bedrooms regarding gay marriage.
Yet here you bring up the irony -- homosexual sex was a criminal offense until after WW2 (and remained so in half the states in the US until the Supreme Court ruling a few years ago invalidating Texas' anti-sodomy laws). So homosexual actions are legal, and just about every type of heterosexual adultery and fornication are legal, but if a group of people want to live in a polygamist family that's considered wrong?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.