FLDS aren't welfare cheats after all.

[KristofferUmfrey]

And I have made the point that it is only in Southern Utah that they really have to use public assistance. Everywhere else they go they are completely self-reliant, big families and all.

[pam]

Fiannan is another story. You and I (I believe) are on the same page as to where we stand with his theories and beliefs.

I'm not disagreeing with a lot you have said. I also didn't agree with all the children in Texas being taken away based on a phone call.

If we were all in agreement with the article in the OP, the conversation should have probably ended there.

[pam]

Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey

And I have made the point that it is only in Southern Utah that they really have to use public assistance. Everywhere else they go they are completely self-reliant, big families and all.

I do believe the article stated that as well.

[KristofferUmfrey]

Originally Posted by pam

I do believe the article stated that as well.

Which is why I don't understand this blanket accusation of irresponsibility and having to "rely of welfare" towards FLDS parents.

[pam]

Like I said. When everyone was in agreement at the beginning the thread should have ended then. We didn't need all the accusations flying both directions.

[HiJolly]

Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey

Which is why I don't understand this blanket accusation of irresponsibility and having to "rely of welfare" towards FLDS parents.

Make peace, not war. You should print out post #65 and hang it on your wall.


HiJolly

[pam]

Dang I had just gotten it quieted down.

[pam]

*Gives HiJolly the evil eye*

[pam]

I'm going to close this thread as I think both sides have had their say. Since it was decided we agreed at the beginning...enough said.