Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > General Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 08:35 AM
Over43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 300
Thanks: 9
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 11 Times in 3 Posts
Default Sidney Rigdon?

I was recently presented with the idea that Sidney Rigdon wrote the Book of Mormon. That's a wonderful theory for those who are looking for the "smoking gun", but Sidney didn't join the church until after Parley Pratt gave him a Book of Mormon while proseletizing in Ohio.

O.
__________________
Hypochondriacs are their own terrorists.- From "More Die of Heartbreak" by Saul Bellow
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 09:10 AM
Hemidakota's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,945
Thanks: 3,060
Thanked 2,529 Times in 1,833 Posts
Laughs: 494
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
Default

A common problem of society today, with the onslaught of poor journalism and the Internet, where people do less research and rely on following others....
__________________
"Moving Forward...together!"

Last edited by Hemidakota; 09-30-2009 at 03:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hemidakota For This Useful Post:
Maxel (09-29-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 10:40 AM
Just_A_Guy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,137 Times in 730 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 290 Times in 159 Posts
Default

The Solomon Spalding theory . . . debunked long ago.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
Maxel (09-29-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:23 AM
hordak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,250
Thanks: 435
Thanked 493 Times in 286 Posts
Laughs: 57
Laughs at 246 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy View Post
The Solomon Spalding theory . . . debunked long ago.
?

From the link

Quote:
A 2008 computer analysis of the text of the Book of Mormon compared to writings of possible authors of the text shows a high probability that the authors of the book were Spalding, Rigdon, and Oliver Cowdery; concluding that "our analysis supports the theory that the Book of Mormon was written by multiple, nineteenth-century authors, and more specifically, we find strong support for the Spalding-Rigdon theory of authorship. In all the data, we find Rigdon as a unifying force. His signal dominates the book, and where other candidates are more probable, Rigdon is often hiding in the shadows".[15]
It does say the manuscript written by spalding isn't the BoM and that a study in the 80s showed it would be very unlikely that spalding was the sole author but i don't see it debunking anything.

Not saying it's true just pointing out that the link provided doesn't debunk the theory, but shows opposing responses.
__________________
"There are not enough general authorities to do all the thinking for the membership of the church." J. Golden Kimball
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:29 AM
Just_A_Guy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,137 Times in 730 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 290 Times in 159 Posts
Default

Point taken, but the article also cites Rigdon as saying that he never saw the Book of Mormon until he was presented with a finished copy--and appealing to his wife and [Edit] daughter as witnesses of that fact.

[Edit 2]: Anyhoo, more here.

Last edited by Just_A_Guy; 09-29-2009 at 11:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
Generally_Me (09-29-2009), hordak (09-29-2009), Maxel (09-29-2009)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 12:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 733
Thanks: 73
Thanked 339 Times in 225 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 30 Times in 22 Posts
Default

The problem with computer textual analysis, is that they are easily biased by assumptions by the content provider. You can "conclude" anything you want. I can make a computer think the Book of Mormon was written by William Shakespeare, Thomas Jefferson or Dan Brown, simply by picking the right samples and tweaking the parameters.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bytebear For This Useful Post:
Generally_Me (09-29-2009), Mason (09-30-2009)
The Following User Laughed Out Loud when they read bytebear's Post:
Hemidakota (09-30-2009)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 12:47 PM
Generally_Me's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 315
Thanks: 644
Thanked 69 Times in 54 Posts
Laughs: 242
Laughs at 33 Times in 22 Posts
Default

JAG, that second link is absolutely fascinating. Thanks for finding it.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 02:17 PM
Maxel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,957
Thanks: 3,084
Thanked 814 Times in 498 Posts
Laughs: 953
Laughs at 230 Times in 142 Posts
Default

So, textual analysis has shown that the Book of Mormon was written by multiple authors? Who woulda thunk!

(The faithful, who already believe the writings of a few different authors are present throughout the book)
__________________
2 Nephi 2:25: Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy.
2 Nephi 25:23, 26: For we labor diligently... to believe in Christ, and to be reconciled to God; for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do... And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Laughed Out Loud when they read Maxel's Post:
talisyn (09-30-2009)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 05:45 PM
Moksha's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 7,070
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,384 Times in 963 Posts
Laughs: 250
Laughs at 1,324 Times in 677 Posts
Default

Uncle Dale has an entire website talking about issues like this. Sidneyrigdon.com. If I remember right, he doesn't think Rigdon wrote it - his website contains tons of original Mormon documents. A history treasure trove.
__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."

Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 102
Thanks: 30
Thanked 24 Times in 18 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moksha View Post
Uncle Dale has an entire website talking about issues like this. Sidneyrigdon.com. If I remember right, he doesn't think Rigdon wrote it - his website contains tons of original Mormon documents. A history treasure trove.


Actually there is a book that recently came out called "Who Really Wrote the Book of Mormon." It updates the Spalding issue. Uncle Dale wrote the preface to the book and agreed with the authors that Rigdon was probably involved in writing the book of Mormon. With some of the additional evidence that has come to light in the last 10 years or so, some historians are reassessing their former position discounting the Spalding theory. For example, even though Rigdon denied being in Pittsburgh prior to 1822 they now have postal records of him receiving his mail there at the same time as Spalding in 1816 or so and other times. It has also been shown that he was friends with one of the employees of the publisher who had the Spalding manuscript when it disappeared. There are other interesting factoids that have come to light recently such as where Rigdon and Cowdery were from 1827-1830 but you will have to read the book and decide for yourselves.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cougarfan For This Useful Post:
Mason (09-30-2009)
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.