|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

08-13-2008, 01:05 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 28
Thanks: 3
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Response to Criticism of Joseph Smith's Lectures on Faith
|

08-13-2008, 04:12 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 995
Thanks: 174
Thanked 277 Times in 195 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
God is faithful to His people is what my understanding would be..two way thing...we have faith in Him and He is faithful...thus a principle of power and action. Without it..we would cease to exist, this principle would cease to exist...God would still exist..but not for us as *our* God because we could not have faith or conviction of the truth of God.
Forgot to scroll down for comments..... posting it as a comment.
Question: wouldn't God have a pre-existence before creation...not sure how to ask this question based on a limited understanding?
__________________
"It's looking crook," said Daniel Croke;
"Bedad, it's cruke, me lad,
For never since the banks went broke
Has seasons been so bad."
And so around the chorus ran
"It's keepin' dry, no doubt."
"We'll all be rooned," said Hanrahan,
"Before the year is out."
 John O'Brien
Last edited by WANDERER; 08-13-2008 at 04:47 AM.
|

08-13-2008, 08:43 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,459
Thanks: 173
Thanked 684 Times in 384 Posts
Laughs: 95
Laughs at 329 Times in 119 Posts
|
|
While the doctrinal teachings in the Lectures on Faith appear to be those of Joseph, I'm pretty sure most scholars agree that the book was actually written by Sydney Rigdon. Compared with other sermons written or spoken by Joseph, Lectures lacks the brevity and incisiveness common in Joseph's words. It also followed a question/answer pattern popular in didactic works of the time but somewhat disjointed and cumbersome for the modern reader (or at least for me).
|

08-13-2008, 09:57 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,733
Thanks: 1,138
Thanked 1,672 Times in 971 Posts
Laughs: 271
Laughs at 420 Times in 192 Posts
|
|
Was the Lectures of Faith ever included in the Standard Works?
__________________
We've got nothing to fear...but fear itself?
Not pain, not failure, not fatal tragedy?
Not the faulty units in this mad machinery?
Not the broken contacts in emotional chemistry?
|

08-13-2008, 10:22 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 76
Thanks: 11
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
It was part of the D&C at one point.
__________________
"How can you say the door cannot be opened until your knuckles are bloody, till your head is bruised, till your muscles are sore? It can be done." - Spencer W. Kimball
"Noah came before the flood. I have come before the fire." Joseph Smith, Jr.
|

08-13-2008, 11:03 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,459
Thanks: 173
Thanked 684 Times in 384 Posts
Laughs: 95
Laughs at 329 Times in 119 Posts
|
|
They were removed from the 1921 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants with the explanation that they "were never presented to nor accepted by the Church as being otherwise than theological lectures or lessons."
It is my understanding that the term "Doctrine and Covenants" itself derives from their original inclusion in the work; they comprised the "doctrine", while the revelations comprised the "covenants".
|

08-13-2008, 11:03 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 5,480
Thanks: 2,553
Thanked 2,672 Times in 1,520 Posts
Laughs: 451
Laughs at 572 Times in 284 Posts
|
|
I think that Faith is so important to our progression. It doesn't alarm me to hear that God has faith or that Jesus exercised faith or that they would cease to be God if they didn't. I think that faith is such a dynamic and essential principle to any follower.....but not just because it is important to believe. But because acquiring faith and then developing it is what moves us closer to becoming Christ-like and then ultimately trustworthy, it makes perfect sense to me that this attribute would be part of the fabric of what makes God a God. If Christ is our example, why wouldn't he be the absolute personification of faith and hope. To think that He doesn't have faith and hope is ridiculous.
Btw...Vort. I did not know that about the lectures of faith. Thanks I learned something new today.
Last edited by Misshalfway; 08-13-2008 at 11:06 PM.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Misshalfway For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-14-2008, 12:31 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 391
Thanks: 61
Thanked 211 Times in 112 Posts
Laughs: 1
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Whether they were written by Joseph Smith or Sydney Rigdon, they were prepared for and used by the Prophet Joseph. The doctrine contained in them is sound, although they are not scripture.
The idea that the Lord has faith is completely rational - can he set as a requirement for salvation something which He himself does not possess? No, He is our exemplar in all things. In every attribute of Godliness, including faith, He is the epitome of strength and perfection.
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NateHowe For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-14-2008, 09:08 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 171
Thanked 436 Times in 274 Posts
Laughs: 5
Laughs at 23 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WANDERER
Question: wouldn't God have a pre-existence before creation...not sure how to ask this question based on a limited understanding?
|
Yes, He and She would.
HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby
|

08-14-2008, 09:12 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 171
Thanked 436 Times in 274 Posts
Laughs: 5
Laughs at 23 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NateHowe
Whether they were written by Joseph Smith or Sydney Rigdon, they were prepared for and used by the Prophet Joseph. The doctrine contained in them is sound, although they are not scripture.
The idea that the Lord has faith is completely rational - can he set as a requirement for salvation something which He himself does not possess? No, He is our exemplar in all things. In every attribute of Godliness, including faith, He is the epitome of strength and perfection.
|
Nate,
I have to admit I'm baiting you, but I would like your ideas here --- So, if God has faith, yet faith is not to have a perfect knowledge, and if God knows everything--- How is this possible?
HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 PM.
|