I agree - it is fun to read about this stuff, but you need the Holy Spirit, not archeology etc.
So when someone wants to come debate you about "no evidence" what do you do? I mean you can sit there and debate them that there is evidence (and there is) but it does no good, you can interpret things multiple ways, and you are not supposed to convince someone of the truthfulness through physical evidence… what do you say?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
sorry for the long read, the following are some things I have posted on the sub, articles that teachers use - not relig but it applies.
There are many different models for intellectual development, here is one of the original ones. All the models center around the ability to first recognize and then deal with uncertainty. The lowest level is dualist – where they think everything can be “proven” fact or fiction, black or white, no uncertainty, nothing that cannot be proven… the most mature level is someone who recognizes that they cannot prove anything, and learn how to make decisions based on personal values – yes, you research it but you cannot prove anything so the decision comes down to personal values and morals…
The Perry Model of Intellectual and Ethical Development
Stages of Cognitive Development
#1: Dualistic Thinking
Students generally believe knowledge is certain and unambiguous: black/white, right/wrong
Questions have immutable, objective answers
Students generally believe authorities possess valuable wisdom that contains eternal truths
Transitions in Cognitive Development 1-2:
Certainty yields to uncertainty and ambiguity
#2: Multiplicity
Students come to believe that where uncertainty exists, knowledge and truth are essentially subjective and personal
Transitions in Cognitive Development 2-3:
Students come to recognize that mere opinion is insufficient because specific critieria help evaluate the usefulness and validity of knowledge claims:
• methodology • empirical evidence
• explanatory power • predictive power
• logical consistency
• positive vs. normative conclusions
#3: Contextual-Relativism
Students come to believe that even where uncertainty exists, people must make choices about premises, frameworks, hypotheses, and theories to apply; policy conclusions are not self-evident
Transitions in Cognitive Development 3-4:
Students may come to recognize that even in a world of uncertainty, they must make choices (whether about ideas, hypotheses, theories, or policies). These choices require methods of critical thinking.
#4: Context-Appropriate Decisions
Students may come to acknowledge that choices require analysis and values. Knowledge, theories, and methods are imperfect and uncertain, thus
personal choices require acknowledging personal responsibility that follows from personal values.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/u...s/IntDev-I.pdf
"
Kroll describes intellectual growth as the progression from “ignorant certainty” to “intelligent confusion”….
Nothing can be considered certain. All observations and data, whether obtained through the human senses or with sophisticated instruments, involve uncertainty, and all attempts to explain, correlate, or model the observations and data must be considered hypothetical, approximate, contextually limited, and subject to subsequent modification…"
there are very few absolute answers for us in this life….
In the end,
it is not about proof and evidence, it is about personal values…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For those who have not yet felt the Holy Spirit - I take a lot of it on faith too – not all of it, but a lot of it. ... life is not all facts and proofs, free will, uncertainty, emotions, personal perspectives, there is a world beyond facts and proofs. Facts exist, but we have a
very limited ability to understand the facts, we have to realize that our decisions are based on personal values more than on what we think we might be able to prove…
Here is an article to ponder, not a relig article, written for teachers, I teach off and on. Anyways, I think it is relevant.
How does God teach us? I do not think God uses facts and proofs - I think His teaching style involves making us learn and think for our self...
Weaning – or encouraging Autonomous Learning by Larry Spence
At 8:30 AM she stood up in class. I wanted to sit. She glared, shooting me with her eyes. “I’m paying good money for this class,” her thin hands shook. “My parents are sacrificing. It’s your job to just tell us what this book means.” She waved a worn copy of Immanuel Kant’s essay, On the old saw: That May be true in Theory but it does not Apply in Practice.
“I can do that, but it will burden the rest of your life.”
“what do you mean?”
“You will always have to take me with you. If you marry, I’ll be there. On your honeymoon, I’ll be there. You will need a special room to keep me in your house. I misplace coffee cups and scatter paper clips. I’ll need a desk next to yours at work. A special seat where I can work in your car…”
“Stop it!” she shouted. “I don’t want to drag a professor through life.”
“Good,” I said. “Then I can’t tell you what the book means. Think of all the books, articles, policy papers, and memos that you will have to read. If you don’t know how to understand them, you will be lost as a citizen, a worker, and an individual. So you can either figure out what Kant means or you can adopt me for life.”
The class’s growing laughter filled the room as they imagined living with a seriously uncool prof. “But
weren’t you paid to teach us?” asked a burly tight end.
“No,
it is my job to see that you learn how to discover the meaning yourself.”
“This class is weird,” came a comment from the baseball cap section.
Students expectation that I could explain the world marred every course I taught. Their intellectual dependence was frightening. On bad days, they were so docile and dependent I understood how good storm troopers were made… But Oh, in the classroom the dependency is sticky and thick. Students seem indifferent, confused, and desirous only of getting this grade, that course, and eventually the big ticket degree. The best strive for that special relationship, “teacher’s pet.” They work to say all those things that feed faculty egos. For many years, I saw little hope of developing autonomous learners. Then I made a discovery.
A group of my students toured with a national champion drum and bugle corps. I went to see them perform. Their precision, quality, and panache astounded me.I could not believe they were the same creatures that shuffled through my courses. They worked twelve hours a day on their musical skills, slept on gym floors, and were driven from city to city without relief. They wre disciplined adults.
I walked away with words like “co-dependency” and “enabling” ringing in my ears. My best efforts taught students that to learn was to follow instructions. They didn’t need that or my careful explanations, or my crafted syllabi. They needed access to the world’s scholarship and some tough coaching like they got in the bugle corps. And most of all
they needed choice and opportunities to pursue their own passions for inquiry and expression.
Maybe we smother the best learning instincts of our students. Seymour Papert writes,
“ the scandal of education is that every time you teach something, you deprive a child of the pleasure of discovery.” Maybe we should stop chewing and pre-digesting the intellectual food we give our students. We need not joke and enact an excitement we wish they had.
We need focus on learning, and not the comfort of the learners.
In earlier times, people took the passion and energy of adolescents as signs of maturity. They weaned them on responsibilities. The impetuous George Washington was surveying frontier lands by the age of sixteen. By 21, with only a few months of formal education, he could ford rivers, chart mountains, charm legislators, and lead troops. Lord Fairfax wrote his mother that he was, “a man who will go to school all his life.” Washington’s classrooms were the forest, the battlefield, and the halls of government. He never asked what was going to be in the final.