Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:42 PM
SeattleTruthSeeker's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: United States -
Age: 38
Posts: 216
Thanks: 36
Thanked 67 Times in 44 Posts
Laughs: 4
Laughs at 4 Times in 1 Post
Send a message via ICQ to SeattleTruthSeeker Send a message via AIM to SeattleTruthSeeker Send a message via MSN to SeattleTruthSeeker Send a message via Yahoo to SeattleTruthSeeker
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey View Post
I just go with the topics as they come up. Ben R.'s "good enough for me." statement about Elder Oaks and white shirts prompted my current wave of conversation. If you don't like it, don't participate.
Actually, the request for the validity of your sources is being asked. Why are you having a hard time stating where you received your sources?

Are you honestly afraid that by relinquishing your sources to be verified and checked out you are going to be proven in error of your argument? If this is the case, then actually the one who needs to remove themselves from the conversation is the one who started the conversation to begin with.

You made an accusation and now that the proof of that accusation is being requested, the source where this information is coming from is being requested and not granted shows the lack of honesty and ability to carry out an intellectual conversation to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:44 PM
KristofferUmfrey's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 585
Thanks: 48
Thanked 87 Times in 74 Posts
Laughs: 11
Laughs at 48 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traveler View Post
Let us try some honesty again. Your avoidance of direct questions leaves me to wonder what you are trying to hide. So I will ask my questions again.

Question 1: How many volumes of the Journal of Discourses have you read (where exactly did you get your quote?) I doubt it was from reading all 26 volumes of Journal of Discourses.

Question 2: Where did you obtain “Ward Teaching” material that is currently out of publication? Again I doubt you got it from any LDS publication, maybe some web site?

Since “Ward Teaching” material is out of publication I would like to know how you checked out the validity of that quote. I would like to check out “your sources” - the real ones.


The Traveler
I wasn't aware you really intended for me to answer your obviously ridiculous questions. Have I read the entire JOD? No
I have them at my disposal to check the context of any given quote.

Do I have access to old "out of publication" Ward teaching materials? No (and I never claimed I did)
Have I read said Ward Teaching materials? No

Where did I find the quote? I remembered it from various things I've read through the years googled it and copied and pasted the first site that quoted it. I have no clue what the site was.

I have nothing to hide.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:45 PM
KristofferUmfrey's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 585
Thanks: 48
Thanked 87 Times in 74 Posts
Laughs: 11
Laughs at 48 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleTruthSeeker View Post
Actually, the request for the validity of your sources is being asked. Why are you having a hard time stating where you received your sources?

Are you honestly afraid that by relinquishing your sources to be verified and checked out you are going to be proven in error of your argument? If this is the case, then actually the one who needs to remove themselves from the conversation is the one who started the conversation to begin with.

You made an accusation and now that the proof of that accusation is being requested, the source where this information is coming from is being requested and not granted shows the lack of honesty and ability to carry out an intellectual conversation to begin with.
The sources are included with the quotes.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 12:50 AM
bmy-'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 603
Thanks: 112
Thanked 173 Times in 120 Posts
Laughs: 9
Laughs at 13 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey View Post
I just go with the topics as they come up. Ben R.'s "good enough for me." statement about Elder Oaks and white shirts prompted my current wave of conversation. If you don't like it, don't participate.
Or you could realize that it is a shallow argument and you would be better off addressing doctrinal issues if you actually intended to interact and learn from the discussion.. (Apologies if you weren't being snarky. Alot of your posts seem full of frustration.)

To answer your question:

When the prophet speaks I give it serious consideration. I can't imagine very many instances where we [the Prophet and I] would not come to the same conclusions. It's a non-issue. He seems to have a good track record for giving advice.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 12:54 AM
KristofferUmfrey's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 585
Thanks: 48
Thanked 87 Times in 74 Posts
Laughs: 11
Laughs at 48 Times in 33 Posts
Default

I admit, I shouldn't have opened this topic. As I stated in my "A Bit Overbearing" topic, I apologize, and will tone it down, and will try to focus on doctrinal disagreements using the Bible and Book of Mormon as my guide.

If Pam wants to shut the topic down, she can have at it.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 01:49 AM
Elphaba's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 6,096
Thanks: 1,908
Thanked 1,402 Times in 743 Posts
Laughs: 727
Laughs at 613 Times in 302 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Elphaba Send a message via MSN to Elphaba
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey View Post
I just go with the topics as they come up. Ben R.'s "good enough for me." statement about Elder Oaks and white shirts prompted my current wave of conversation.
I don't buy it. The way you worded your OP is straight out of "Anti-Mormon 101."

Quote:
If you don't like it, don't participate.
Obviously the reason I did participate is because I don't like it. We do things like that here.

Elphaba
__________________
We can't change the country.
Let us change the subject.
Stephen Dedalus,
Ulysses
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Elphaba For This Useful Post:
candyprpl (11-20-2008)
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 05:26 AM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,080
Thanks: 52
Thanked 1,296 Times in 636 Posts
Laughs: 32
Laughs at 363 Times in 164 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey View Post
I just go with the topics as they come up. Ben R.'s "good enough for me." statement about Elder Oaks and white shirts prompted my current wave of conversation. If you don't like it, don't participate.
Once again, reading the reference in question might help you understand something. Elder Oaks quoted Elder Holland in this October's Conference. You can read the entire talk. Ben's comments referred to the explanation for why Priesthood holders wear white shirts to officiate in the Sacrament. This was not done by way of commandment. It was done by was of suggestion, and rationale for the suggestion was given. Again, perhaps you should try reading the source.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey View Post
Where did I find the quote? I remembered it from various things I've read through the years googled it and copied and pasted the first site that quoted it. I have no clue what the site was.

I have nothing to hide.
So now I'm supposed to trust your incredible memory for all of the context of this quote. For some reason I'm having a hard time conjuring up that level of trust.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 08:25 AM
Hemidakota's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,945
Thanks: 3,060
Thanked 2,529 Times in 1,833 Posts
Laughs: 494
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KristofferUmfrey View Post
Two cities? What's the other one besides Enoch? (which could be a whole other discussion, but I'll defer)
No problem....the other city was called Salem...where the current Jerusalem is located today. These were the same individuals [members of that city] who visited Abraham and was told to save Lot and others from the five cities of the plain.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 08:45 AM
KristofferUmfrey's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 585
Thanks: 48
Thanked 87 Times in 74 Posts
Laughs: 11
Laughs at 48 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemidakota View Post
No problem....the other city was called Salem...where the current Jerusalem is located today. These were the same individuals [members of that city] who visited Abraham and was told to save Lot and others from the five cities of the plain.
Hemi-
Could you please provide the verses that show the city was translated?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 08:50 AM
ceeboo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba View Post
I don't buy it. The way you worded your OP is straight out of "Anti-Mormon 101."


Elphaba
Hi ya Elphaba,

Is that really a course ?

What degree would that be in ?

How many credits is it worth ?

Thanks for the answers that are coming soon

Peace,
Carl
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.