Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 01:31 PM
rameumptom's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 4,239
Thanks: 746
Thanked 2,015 Times in 1,146 Posts
Laughs: 263
Laughs at 445 Times in 284 Posts
Default

Jesus stated that he came with a sword. He was the one who commanded Moses and Joshua to absolutely destroy the cities before them that would not surrender to Israel's banner.

This same Christ flooded the earth and destroyed all the wicked of Noah's day. He destroyed Israel and Judea for rejecting Him. And he had the Romans destroy Jerusalem after his crucifixion.

Through his apostle John, we find that Jesus will destroy most of the inhabitants of the earth in the last days, as well. Just look at all the destroying angels, plagues, disasters, and wars prophecied in the Book of Revelation! Then, those not found in the Book of Life will be cast into a lake of fire and brimstone.

Seems like Joseph is in good company. Christ offered peace and blessings for those who accepted Him and his gospel. He also offered destruction for the wicked. Christ worked this way anciently through his prophets and apostles, and he continues to give such warnings through his modern prophets.

But Joseph also taught how we can escape the destructions promised to the wicked by our Savior. He said that if we keep the commandments and follow Christ, we will be blessed in our lands. This teaching is throughout the Book of Mormon and D&C. And it fits perfectly with Christ's call to repentance - either we repent and follow Christ and His servants, or we are destroyed.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rameumptom For This Useful Post:
Iggy (12-03-2008), skalenfehl (12-06-2008)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 01:34 PM
Wingnut's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 28
Posts: 3,534
Thanks: 1,241
Thanked 1,216 Times in 721 Posts
Laughs: 1,185
Laughs at 906 Times in 474 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceeboo View Post
I wonder if you could find a " quote " or " bit of history " that would make the Catholics look not so good
No way...is that possible?

(Not intending to rip on Catholics, just to point out, as I believe Ceeboo also was doing, that all religions have a dark spot here or there.)
__________________
If evolution really works, how come mothers only have two hands? -- Milton Berle

Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed. -- C.S. Lewis
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Wingnut For This Useful Post:
Misshalfway (12-03-2008), siouxz72 (12-04-2008), Truegrits (12-03-2008)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 01:38 PM
rameumptom's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 4,239
Thanks: 746
Thanked 2,015 Times in 1,146 Posts
Laughs: 263
Laughs at 445 Times in 284 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceeboo View Post
Hey ya Pale,

I wonder if you could find a " quote " or " bit of history " that would make the Catholics look not so good

Yes indeed, perspective and faith guides us !!!
I can find much on most religions.

Catholics at one time had 3 concurrent popes who excommunicated each other. Of course, we could also discuss the Inquisition and Indulgences....

Protestants had John Calvin burning people at the stake; witches being burned at the stake; and supported Henry VIII in his "divorces". Protestant ministers led the way of those who murdered Joseph Smith, and in implementing the "extermination order" against the Mormons in Missouri.

Given such histories, I don't think a few quotes from Joseph Smith seem quite so bad.

I don't judge churches from their past histories, as I know they are all run by imperfect humans. What makes a good or bad church, is what are the doctrines they teach and implement?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 04:44 PM
Aesa's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 692
Thanks: 161
Thanked 95 Times in 68 Posts
Laughs: 38
Laughs at 10 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceeboo View Post
Hey ya Pale,

I wonder if you could find a " quote " or " bit of history " that would make the Catholics look not so good

Yes indeed, perspective and faith guides us !!!
Well if you want to get into that discussion too, I could go on forever. :P
Really (and I know this is kind of Off-topic) if you want to compare Islamic "extremism" and the Catholic church... well, the catholics have killed millions and millions more.

Quote:
I don't judge churches from their past histories, as I know they are all run by imperfect humans. What makes a good or bad church, is what are the doctrines they teach and implement?
I wasn't trying to judge with the quote, more trying to get a perspective. Anyway, I couldn't agree more with you along the lines of if a church is an institution, it's run by imperfect people. This is why, in my opinion, Christ never said His church should be an institution.
Institutions become "same-old-same-old" and people just attend because they're a member (the majority anyway), this brings to mind children saying on verbatim "I know the church is true, I know Joseph Smith is a prophet, etc,..." ... and they don't even understand what they're saying.

In regards to what makes a "good church," well first of all none of our works (creating a church, being one of them) is good in the eyes of God. The Bible says that all of our works are as filthy rags before God. This is why Bible believing Christians will probably at one time or another say "God is not in the institution of Church..." You are complete in Christ and Christ only, when you become part of the body of Christ through salvation you are saved.

Last edited by Aesa; 12-03-2008 at 04:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 04:54 PM
Misshalfway's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 5,480
Thanks: 2,553
Thanked 2,673 Times in 1,521 Posts
Laughs: 451
Laughs at 572 Times in 284 Posts
Default

I don't know Aesa, but you might feel that way too if the homes of your friends and family had been burned and your people chased from place to place in fear of their lives by the very government whose freedoms were suppose to protect you.

There is a point where God's people are justified to stop turning the other cheek.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 05:03 PM
Aesa's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 692
Thanks: 161
Thanked 95 Times in 68 Posts
Laughs: 38
Laughs at 10 Times in 8 Posts
Default

When has Christ stop turning His cheek?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 05:17 PM
Misshalfway's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 5,480
Thanks: 2,553
Thanked 2,673 Times in 1,521 Posts
Laughs: 451
Laughs at 572 Times in 284 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aesa View Post
When has Christ stop turning His cheek?
I really think this has already been answered in earlier posts. Again, perhaps a review of the Old Testament might give some insights.

I don't think the Lord expects that we don't defend ourselves. For those who choose to turn the other cheek, such will be turned for righteousness. But Jesus doesn't justify those who have the obligation to defend and protect and who don't take up the sword to do so. There are times when the preservation of family and country is justified....even by the sword. And if someone broke into your home and raped your child, would you sit there and speak love and touch fingers and hum with your invader? I mean come on. There is common sense in Christ's gospel. Not every horrible invasion or abuse should be tolerated. There is something called standing up for the right. Even when it sometimes means using force.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 05:17 PM
Elgama's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 674
Thanked 843 Times in 567 Posts
Laughs: 98
Laughs at 84 Times in 51 Posts
Default

when did God say a prophet or patriach had to be perfect? - Anger is not always a bad emotion

Abraham - let a wife and son go out into the desert with no servants or support
Jacob - showed so much favouritism with his kids that 10 almost murdered 1.
Moses - killed a man, and took an honour upon himself that was not his to have
Aaron - made a golden calf for people to worship
Noah - got drunk and wandered round naked
Jonah - questioned God time and again, not mention the incident with the Gourd
The disciples could not stay awake for 1 hour
Peter - denied Christ 3 times
Timothy - doubted the resurrection
Elijah - BBQ'd about 300 people
Paul - before he repented assisted in killing Christians


There are loads more just the ones came of the top of my head

All this and we only have a small portion of these prophets lives if we had the volumme of writings on them that we do have on Joseph Smith wonder if they would have had more incidents.

-Charley

Last edited by Elgama; 12-03-2008 at 05:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 05:20 PM
Aesa's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 692
Thanks: 161
Thanked 95 Times in 68 Posts
Laughs: 38
Laughs at 10 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Friend, if you're going to make Peter a prophet ... then that makes all of the true body of Christ prophets.
I wouldn't necesarily disagree with that either, because we're kind of prophesying when we speak of His second coming.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 05:24 PM
Elgama's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 674
Thanked 843 Times in 567 Posts
Laughs: 98
Laughs at 84 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aesa View Post
Friend, if you're going to make Peter a prophet ... then that makes all of the true body of Christ prophets.
I wouldn't necesarily disagree with that either, because we're kind of prophesying when we speak of His second coming.
If you are a Latter Day Saint he is was as much a prophet as Joseph Smith or President Monson,

So in the context of your question it is entirely relevant to use Peter. Timothy and Paul

-Charley
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.