Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 05:42 PM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1,277 Times in 625 Posts
Laughs: 32
Laughs at 363 Times in 164 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HiJolly View Post
I was fortunate to hear a lengthy presentation on this last year, from a DNA researcher and Grad student. His name is Ugo Perego and his presentation was called Joseph Smith's DNA Revealed: New Clues from the Prophet's Genes . It was really, really good.

He said that they have done the research on all but 3 or 4 of the claimed decendents of JSJr. and none except the children of Emma have come up positive for Joseph's DNA. Not even Josephina Lightener, who had been considered my many to be his physical daughter, due to the evidence. But no...

I loved the book. I think it is very accurate. I would have liked more material on the 'peep stone'/money digging pre-trial hearing, in the book.

The more I learn about Joseph, the more I love the man. What an inspiration.


HiJolly
I've not read Rough Stone Rolling, but from reading History of the Church I was able to gather that Smith was a very arrogant, stubborn, and magnificently flawed man. I was often disappointed in his actions. Seeing the flaws actually increased my testimony of him as a prophet. He always got the doctrines right. He always got the principles right. He always got the intentions right. Sometimes his execution was poor. But every time I read the doctrines that he taught, I feel that they are true. Only a prophet could be that flawed and always teach true doctrine.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 05:51 PM
Maya's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,663
Thanks: 1,504
Thanked 317 Times in 249 Posts
Laughs: 208
Laughs at 80 Times in 57 Posts
Default

Here is the search of josephs DNA from "his kids" this is a few years a go. Sorry cant remember where I got this. I also listened to Ugo he is a great guy!

Josephine Lyon (Birth: February 8, 1844)
Mother: Sylvia Sessions Lyon
Father: Windsor Lyon

Zebulun Jacobs (Birth: January 2, 1842)
Mother: Zina Huntington Jacobs
Father: Henry Jacobs

George Algernon Lightner (Birth: March 22, 1842)
Mother: Mary Rollins Lightner
Father: Adam Lightner

Oliver Buell (Birth: 1838 – 39)
Mother: Presendia Huntington Buell
Father: Norman Buell

Orson Washington Hyde (Birth: November 9, 1843)
Mother: Marinda Johnson Hyde
Father: Orson Hyde

Frank Henry Hyde (Birth: January 23, 1845)
Mother: Marinda Johnson Hyde
Father: Orson Hyde

Moroni Pratt (Birth: December 7, 1844)
Mother: Mary Ann Frost
Father: Parley P. Pratt

John Reed Hancock (Birth: April 19, 1841)
Mother: Clarissa Reed Hancock
Father: Levi Hancock

Joseph Smith is NOT the father of Moroni Pratt.

Joseph Smith is NOT the father of Zebulon Jacobs.

Joseph Smith is NOT the father of Fanny Alger's claimed descendancy.
__________________
Live your life in such a way that when your feet hit the floor in the morning,Satan shudders and says .... "Oh crap,.... she`s awake!!"

New CyberMisionary forum for CMs at www.LDS1.org
.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 06:09 PM
HiJolly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 171
Thanked 436 Times in 274 Posts
Laughs: 5
Laughs at 23 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError View Post
I've not read Rough Stone Rolling, but from reading History of the Church I was able to gather that Smith was a very arrogant, stubborn, and magnificently flawed man. I was often disappointed in his actions. Seeing the flaws actually increased my testimony of him as a prophet. He always got the doctrines right. He always got the principles right. He always got the intentions right. Sometimes his execution was poor. But every time I read the doctrines that he taught, I feel that they are true. Only a prophet could be that flawed and always teach true doctrine.
Not arrogant. Stubborn, yes. Flawed, yes. Never arrogant.

Perhaps 'defiant with attitude' would be a good word instead of arrogant. The statements he made that are seen by some as arrogant were not, IMO.


HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 07:29 PM
bytor2112's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,733
Thanks: 1,138
Thanked 1,674 Times in 972 Posts
Laughs: 271
Laughs at 420 Times in 192 Posts
Default

Not arrogant.......pridefully confident, maybe.
__________________
We've got nothing to fear...but fear itself?
Not pain, not failure, not fatal tragedy?
Not the faulty units in this mad machinery?
Not the broken contacts in emotional chemistry?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 07:35 PM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1,277 Times in 625 Posts
Laughs: 32
Laughs at 363 Times in 164 Posts
Default

No. Arrogant is definitely the word I would use. There were many moments where he thought he could do no wrong, and then would rationalize poor behavior when he was called on it. It took a awful lot to convince him to use the words, "I made a mistake." I'm pretty sure that counts as arrogance.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MarginOfError For This Useful Post:
Elphaba (01-08-2009)
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 09:00 PM
Palerider's Avatar
Head Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 15,554
Thanks: 966
Thanked 1,178 Times in 847 Posts
Laughs: 1,552
Laughs at 1,162 Times in 699 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Palerider Send a message via Yahoo to Palerider
Default

I read the book and I thought it was awesome. I do not think he was arrogant. This book did not hurt my testimony at all. If anything I feel it helped to strengthen it even more. Joseph Smith was not perfect and indeed made mistakes. Wow, he was human....I know one thing, I could not have gone thru and served as he did in his calling. I now have the book titled Joseph Smith Papers in front of me. When I am finished reading this other book I have about Nauvoo then I am on to that book. I hope some of you will read the book Rough Stone Rolling.
One other series of Lectures that are awesome about the Prophet is the Truman Madsen lecture series.
__________________
As Long As I Am Here......It Doesn't Matter Where Here Is.....

All great change in America begins at the dinner table......Ronald Reagan

Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.....Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Palerider For This Useful Post:
Elphaba (01-08-2009)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 09:07 PM
Moksha's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 6,867
Thanks: 356
Thanked 1,337 Times in 924 Posts
Laughs: 233
Laughs at 1,259 Times in 646 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceeboo View Post
Not being a member, I would be SHOCKED if 95% of LDS members do not know this.

Not arguing, just struck me as a VERY high percentage.

Peace,
Ceeboo

We are a prophetic and sheltered people. But hey, look on the bright side - there is a lot to learn.

.
__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."

Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 10:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 137
Thanks: 31
Thanked 47 Times in 31 Posts
Laughs: 7
Laughs at 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

One of the things that Bushman mentions in his interview with Dehlin, but I'm not sure it is in the book itself, is how well done the Brodie work is. I have to agree with him after working my way through much of her book. Many people call it "Anti Mormon", but I don't really get that. It feels to me that any book written by a member of the church is "OK", but if the same material is written by a non/ex mo than it must be "Anti". I just have not found that to be the case.

Has anyone here read Fawn Brodie "No man knows my History"?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2009, 11:35 PM
Bookmeister's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 339
Thanks: 108
Thanked 139 Times in 76 Posts
Laughs: 29
Laughs at 39 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Where do I find out more about the giant pink elephants?
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2009, 12:11 AM
HiJolly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 171
Thanked 436 Times in 274 Posts
Laughs: 5
Laughs at 23 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
One of the things that Bushman mentions in his interview with Dehlin, but I'm not sure it is in the book itself, is how well done the Brodie work is. I have to agree with him after working my way through much of her book. Many people call it "Anti Mormon", but I don't really get that. It feels to me that any book written by a member of the church is "OK", but if the same material is written by a non/ex mo than it must be "Anti". I just have not found that to be the case.

Has anyone here read Fawn Brodie "No man knows my History"?
Brodie was LDS. I think her 1st edition was better without all the psycho-stuff she added later. Reminds me of Michael Moore's Bush "documentary" on 9/11----- "What was Bush thinking? Was he thinking 'I need to get a haircut.'?" (sigh)

No doubt she is a good writer, though.


HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.