Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 02:45 PM
Hemidakota's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,801
Thanks: 3,029
Thanked 2,499 Times in 1,809 Posts
Laughs: 483
Laughs at 264 Times in 184 Posts
Default For those who wish to understand this unique book

Introductory Material
Book of Abraham Articles - from the Encyclopedia of Mormonism. Several short articles about various aspects of the Book of Abraham and issues surrounding it, put online by "All About Mormons".

A Joseph Smith Commentary on the Book of Abraham - by W.V. Smith. Download a copy of this excellent book from the Book of Abraham Project (BOAP). All aspects of modern Book of Abraham studies are discussed. (Note: the text is in WP 6.1 format, so make sure your word processor can read it.)

Prolegomena to any Study of the Book of Abraham
- by Hugh Nibley. An early article by Nibley where he oulined what must be done for scholars to adequately study Joseph Smith's Book of Abraham.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Book of Abraham as a Translation of Egyptian Papyri
LDS FAQ: Book of Abraham Part 1 - by Jeff Lindsay. An extensive review of the controversy surrounding the Book of Abraham and the Joseph Smith Papyri. Click here for Part 2.

A Tragedy of Errors - by John Gee. Review of C.M. Larsen's By His Own Hand Upon Papyrus in the FARMS Review of Books.

Review of Charles Larson "By His Own Hand Upon Papyrus" Part 1 - by Kerry Shirts. Part 1 deals with Larson's idea that holy scripture such as the Book of Abraham is suposed to be could not in any way be connected with pagan documents such as the Joseph Smith Papyri.

Abracadabra, Isaac and Jacob - by John Gee. Review of Edward H. Ashment's "The Use of Egyptian Magical Papyri to Authenticate the Book of Abraham: A Critical Review" in the FARMS Review of Books.

Criticism of Joseph Smith and the Book of Abraham - from the BOAP. Responses to various criticisms.

Review of "Egyptology and the Book of Abraham" Part 1 - by Kerry Shirts. Review of the Dialogue article by LDS egyptologist Stephen Thompson. Part 1 deals with the "Sons of Horus" in facsimiles 1 and 2. Part 2 deals with the ship representing the heavens in facsimile 2. Part 3 deals with the Hathor Cow Goddess figure in facsimile 2.

The Three Facsimiles from the Book of Abraham - by Hugh Nibley. Discusses Joseph Smith's interpretation of the three facsimiles in light of modern egyptology.

"Shinehah" as the Sun in Abraham 3:13 - by Kerry Shirts. An interesting example of an Egyptian word Joseph Smith nailed.

The "Star-Apes" of Facsimile 2: Egyptian Correlations - by Kerry Shirts. Can apes represent stars? Joseph Smith thought so, and he was right!

The Ship in Facsimile 2 as the Throne of God - by Kerry Shirts. There's too much here to be explained away as a "coincidence".

Abraham,Father of the Faithful, or the Pagan God Osiris? - by Kerry Shirts. Could Abraham actually have been connected with the Joseph Smith Papyri, including the Lion Couch scene in Facsimile 1? Kerry answers in the affirmative.
Notes on the Book of Abraham - Taken from Introduction to the Pearl of Great Price and Its Teachings, Copyright The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Church Schools. Whoever wrote these notes takes the view that Joseph Smith DID use the JS Papyri to "translate" the Book of Abraham in a very unusual fashion.

Mnemonic Device of Egyptian Alphabet and Grammar and Joseph Smith Translation of the Book of Abraham - by John Tvedtnes and Richley Crapo. Examines the hypothesis that the sen-sen text was a mnemonic device for the Book of Abraham.

Fragment Found in Salt Lake City
- by Hugh Nibley. Short preliminary article by Nibley where he talked about some of the difficulties faced in approaching the Joseph Smith papyri.

What is "The Book of Breathings"?
- by Hugh Nibley. Discusses the Egyptian religious significance of some of the Joseph Smith Papyri, i.e. the sen-sen text.

Did Joseph Smith Know Egyptian? - short article from the FARMS newsletter, Insights: An Ancient Window.

The Crocodile God of Pharaoh in Mesopotamia - short article from FARMS' Insights (based on research by John Gee). Note: John Gee informs me that in every place in the article (including the title) where the word "Mesopotamia" (but not "Mesopotamian") occurs, the word should read "Syria."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Book of Abraham as a Jewish Document
Neglected Evidence on the Book of Abraham - by Hugh Nibley. This article, originally appearing in the Improvement Era, discusses the Book of Abraham in light of Jewish apocryphal stories about Abraham.

A Critical Analysis of the Book of Abraham in Light of Extra-Canonical Jewish Writings - by Rabbi Nissim Wernick. Rabbi Wernick was the leader of the Synagogue in Salt Lake City, and he went to BYU to get a doctorate in Religious Education. While there he became interested in the Book of Abraham, and decided to compare the extra-biblical details in the BofA to similar ideas found in extra-canonical Jewish writings for his dissertation. I don't know that Rabbi Wernick ever became LDS, but this dissertation is still striking confirmation of the Jewishness of the Book of Abraham - straight from a Jewish Rabbi. NOTE: This file is pretty huge.

The Book of Jasher and the Book of Abraham - by Kerry Shirts. Some critics have charged that Joseph Smith lifted the Book of Abraham from the Book of Jasher, a Jewish apocryphal document he could have known about. While it is not surprising to LDS that the Book of Abraham would have some parallels to such a document, Kerry shows why the contents of Jasher can actually account for very little of Abraham.

Human Sacrifice in the Book of Abraham - by Kerry Shirts. The Book of Abraham describes in some detail the Egyptian practice of human sacrifice. Those same details can also be found in Jewish sources other than the Bible.
Abraham's Vision of the Pre-Existent Host - by Barry Bickmore. The Book of Abraham account of this vision is briefly compared with that of the Apocalypse of Abraham, an apocryphal Jewish document unknown in Joseph Smith's day.

The "Angel of God's Presence" in Abraham 1:15-16 - by Barry Bickmore. The "angel of his presence" was actually Jehovah Himself? The Book of Abraham says so, and so did the earliest Israelite and Christian traditions!

The "Council of the Gods" in Ancient Literature and the Book of Abraham - by Kerry Shirts. The Book of Abraham presents a rather strange picture of a "council of the gods" as part of the premortal existence. What have scholars learned since the publication of the Book of Abraham concerning this gathering? Find out here!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
More Information
Kerry A. Shirts' Mormonism Researched Page- This page has all of Kerry's articles that are housed at this site (I've edited the ones here, though) as well as several more. Covers both the Egyptian and Jewish backgrounds for the Book of Abraham

Credit to Barry for the time in finding online documents....
__________________
"Moving Forward...together!"
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 05:38 PM
HiJolly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 171
Thanked 436 Times in 274 Posts
Laughs: 5
Laughs at 23 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
I'm not sure that you can say this is an "Approved History Book" Just because it is sold at Deseret Book doesn't mean it is "approved". Actually, if you listen to the bushman interviews with John Dehlin, Bushman mentions that the church has gotten out of the business of releasing history books.
I agree with you on the 'approved' comment. But hey--- The Church is B-A-C-K in business.... Joseph Smith Papers

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
One thing that amazes me is when some of you will mention that why would anyone read this type of book when you can just pray for a witness.
FWIW, *I've* never said that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
With all the push in our church about keeping and reading history of the church. We study it once every 4 years, but in my mind, most people know very little about the history of our early leaders. In reality, there is very little that is in the official material that is even true.
Really? I think you've gone way too far on that one. Sometimes saying everything we know is not the right thing to do. In this case, I think the setting makes all the difference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
How many people know the real story about polygamy and polyandry?
I'd guess about 10% and 2% of the active members, respectively. I know I'm pulling #'s out of thin air.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
How many people know the real story about the peepstone and the "translation process"
I'll bet *you* don't, no offense intended. I'm sure you know about the hat and the glowing letters and the two stones (as well as the "Nephite Interpreters") --- and that's pretty good. But it ain't ALL, my friend. The spirit played a role, and I don't think there's any direct description of how that worked other than "by the power and gift of God". And I really think that should be enough. Let the Book speak for itself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
How many people know about the Kinderhook Plates?
Guessing-- 2% of the active members.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
How many people know about the history about the Book of Abraham?
About 5% for most of it, (the parts written about in the Ensign magazine), and only 2% for the really interesting parts. At a guess.


Your point, though, seems to be that the Church should be teaching all this history. If so, I really think you're wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
It just seems weird that in books like our study guides like Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, not one single word is mentioned about Polygamy. But... when a book like RSR is read, it is all over the place. Crazy...
One is secular, the other is faithful. It is not at all "Crazy". Everything has a purpose.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockwoodchev View Post
For me... RSR cemented in my mind many problems with early history of the church. If Joseph Smith was willing to "lie for the Lord" about Spiritual Wifery, what else would he lie about? I've yet to answer that question.
Keep working on it. Read the testimonies given in D.C. concerning polygamy decades later. I've pondered it for decades, and I'm doing very well with it, thank you very much. If it weren't for the history of Joseph Smith Jr., I would never have had the courage to become a mystic. He's my hero.


HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby

Last edited by HiJolly; 01-08-2009 at 07:16 PM. Reason: Clarification and spelling (and shhh... revising percentages)
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 05:43 PM
HiJolly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 171
Thanked 436 Times in 274 Posts
Laughs: 5
Laughs at 23 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemidakota View Post
Before Kerry Shirts shows up and beats me to the pulp, I do consider Kerry's work just as impressive as Nibleys work.
Brown noser.

Kerry is NOT in Nibley's league, much as I love the guy. We are both mystics and we see each other once a year or so. He's awesome, and way smart, but not all that.


HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009, 12:18 AM
Moksha's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 6,867
Thanks: 356
Thanked 1,337 Times in 924 Posts
Laughs: 233
Laughs at 1,259 Times in 646 Posts
Default

I like his Backwoods Professor videos. Nibley did not put any of his videos on YouTube!

__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."

Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009, 06:50 AM
hordak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,211
Thanks: 411
Thanked 460 Times in 268 Posts
Laughs: 50
Laughs at 235 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba View Post
The people I've talked to who had heard Joseph practiced polygamy thought he only married widows because there was no one to take care of them.

Elphaba
I recall being taught as a youth that the main reason for polygamy was so that the women traveling to Utah would have the Priesthood in their family as they traveled. Whether this is right or wrong it ignores the fact it was practiced before BY and that some of these women had already been married.

I don't know if this came from a manual or personal opinion but I have heard many members who really don't know the history come up with these sorts of "soft ball" answers.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009, 05:34 PM
FlaviusHambonius's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 183
Thanks: 127
Thanked 64 Times in 41 Posts
Laughs: 16
Laughs at 15 Times in 12 Posts
Default

I finished reading RSR several weeks ago and thought it was a great book. It took me quite awhile to get through as time allowed, which is not the way I like to read a book.
I had heard about it a couple of years ago from a non-Mormon and when I read a couple of reviews on it. They basically said that it wouldn't effect your views on Mormonism, one way or the other, whether you were LDS or non-LDS, at least the couple that I read.

I have heard it said that Bushman is one of the premiere historians when it comes to Joseph Smith, and I appriciate his work on this book, and thought in my mind that he was pretty fair and balanced with the good, the bad and the ugly regarding Joseph Smith.

I must say at times I felt like I was on a roller-coaster ride at times regarding JS in this book. Sometimes I was shaking my head about JS and then sometimes coming back to a somewhat even keel regarding this man. It seems like Bushman at times would shovel the dirt on him only to bring you back to Josephs way of thinking or perspective or so it seemed to me at times.

The disiplinary council I thought for the most part was a joke, or should I say disturbing. Joseph brought these people in to these councils who had either offended him or had acused him of him of inappropriate behavior in their eyes, and the next thing you know, it's either Joseph's way or the highway or in their case a dirt road.
It seems as though the other party was always shown to be the guilty party by Joseph and the bretheren and that Joseph was alway's right of course. I don't remember one time that JS actually admitted that he was perhaps in the wrong. It was always, always, the other guy--as best that I can remember. Of course, after the offending party would concede to their supposed guilt, the JS would soften his heart and forgive the offender and all would be well in Zion----what a load of BS. (IMO)

I had to respect Oliver Cowdry for standing his ground against JS with his accusation of "the filthy, dirty scandalous affair" regarding Joseph and Fanny Alger. Oliver never recanted his accusation if memory serves me and it wasn't long after that Oliver was ex-communicated. Joseph's main concern was that he was shown not to have committed adultry---why?----because Joseph had taken Fanny to be his 'spiritual wife'---secretly of course. This would have been years before the doctrine came out.

I might not be exactly precise with the info--but I think I'm pretty close--like I say I read it in segments over a too long of a period.

I'm currently reading 'Mormon Enigma:Emma Hale Smith' with about 100 pages to go, and all I can say is-- WOW--hopefully I can get it knocked out by the weekend. I have enjoyed this book even more than RSR.
Yes, to say that JS was human and flawed is an understatment (IMO)--but then aren't we all?
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009, 05:52 PM
FlaviusHambonius's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 183
Thanks: 127
Thanked 64 Times in 41 Posts
Laughs: 16
Laughs at 15 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemidakota View Post
Perhaps instead of reading books about this type of topic but seek a witness of the Prophet Joseph Smith?
So what's wrong with reading this type of book? Especially if it's from an LDS author who is supposedly one of the great historians on the life of Joseph Smith? Is it better to go hide under a rock regarding Mormon history or is it better to get a more accurate version of events, or shall I say a more rounded or fuller account.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.