Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2009, 08:56 PM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,080
Thanks: 52
Thanked 1,295 Times in 636 Posts
Laughs: 32
Laughs at 363 Times in 164 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverafter View Post
Somehow I don't think the Church wants everyone to be sealed to all their former boyfriends & girlfriends that they had before they got married. I do Genealogy & it's easy for things like the above to slip through & be done but it doesn't make it valid. And if Abe was a good & faithful husband I'm sure he wasn't still in love with his former fiance after he married Mary Todd. And if he did secretly still keep feelings alive for a former flame while married to someone else, then that would probably make him unworthy for either marriage.
That's complete and utter nonsense. What you state here implies that a man is only capable of loving one woman at a time, which entirely nullifies the practice of polygamy. It would mean that when the Lord commanded polygamy, he was commanding men to take wives and not to love them, which is an absurd premise.

The human heart and soul have an infinite capacity to love. Marriage is not as much about love as it is about commitment. It is completely possible to love more than one woman and choose only to commit one's self to one woman. In fact, a person who can do that would make a far superior husband than a man who could only love one person.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2009, 09:41 PM
beefche's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,503
Thanks: 415
Thanked 978 Times in 555 Posts
Laughs: 507
Laughs at 728 Times in 332 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbs2763 View Post
so I'm on fries and you are on the shake machine? lol
And don't you dare yell at me to "shake it, baby!"
__________________
We have been called as witnesses, not judge or jury.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 09:16 AM
Hemidakota's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,935
Thanks: 3,058
Thanked 2,528 Times in 1,832 Posts
Laughs: 493
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError View Post
That's complete and utter nonsense. What you state here implies that a man is only capable of loving one woman at a time, which entirely nullifies the practice of polygamy. It would mean that when the Lord commanded polygamy, he was commanding men to take wives and not to love them, which is an absurd premise.

The human heart and soul have an infinite capacity to love. Marriage is not as much about love as it is about commitment. It is completely possible to love more than one woman and choose only to commit one's self to one woman. In fact, a person who can do that would make a far superior husband than a man who could only love one person.
I have to agree...when we touch the soul of another through affection, our souls become one - call it true love -. We can love more than one...
__________________
"Moving Forward...together!"
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009, 08:58 AM
Wingnut's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 29
Posts: 3,612
Thanks: 1,281
Thanked 1,246 Times in 741 Posts
Laughs: 1,219
Laughs at 929 Times in 487 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverafter View Post
Somehow I don't think the Church wants everyone to be sealed to all their former boyfriends & girlfriends that they had before they got married. I do Genealogy & it's easy for things like the above to slip through & be done but it doesn't make it valid. And if Abe was a good & faithful husband I'm sure he wasn't still in love with his former fiance after he married Mary Todd. And if he did secretly still keep feelings alive for a former flame while married to someone else, then that would probably make him unworthy for either marriage.
Oh my freaking gosh. Will you stop judging everyone's worthiness to be married already?
__________________
If evolution really works, how come mothers only have two hands? -- Milton Berle

Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed. -- C.S. Lewis
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009, 12:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 730
Thanks: 72
Thanked 339 Times in 225 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 30 Times in 22 Posts
Default

back to the original query. The short answer is no. What if a husband and wife are sealed, but the husband dies shortly after. Then she remarries, has a full and complete life with husband number 2 complete with kids and grandkids. Should she be forced to be with her first husband because he was sealed to her, abandoning a lifetime with another man? I think not.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 04:44 PM
annamaureen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 128
Thanks: 0
Thanked 41 Times in 27 Posts
Laughs: 1
Laughs at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError View Post
That's complete and utter nonsense. What you state here implies that a man is only capable of loving one woman at a time, which entirely nullifies the practice of polygamy. It would mean that when the Lord commanded polygamy, he was commanding men to take wives and not to love them, which is an absurd premise.
But there can be different kinds of love... say a man is married to one woman, his "true love," and is commanded to take more wives. Does that mean he'll fall romantically in love with all of them? Or perhaps that he'll love them in a different way? It's still love, and caring, and affection, but surely it doesn't mean he'll be head over heels in love with all of them. Like, the difference between loving someone and being in love with them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.