|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

07-06-2009, 08:56 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,080
Thanks: 52
Thanked 1,295 Times in 636 Posts
Laughs: 32
Laughs at 363 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverafter
Somehow I don't think the Church wants everyone to be sealed to all their former boyfriends & girlfriends that they had before they got married. I do Genealogy & it's easy for things like the above to slip through & be done but it doesn't make it valid. And if Abe was a good & faithful husband I'm sure he wasn't still in love with his former fiance after he married Mary Todd. And if he did secretly still keep feelings alive for a former flame while married to someone else, then that would probably make him unworthy for either marriage.
|
That's complete and utter nonsense. What you state here implies that a man is only capable of loving one woman at a time, which entirely nullifies the practice of polygamy. It would mean that when the Lord commanded polygamy, he was commanding men to take wives and not to love them, which is an absurd premise.
The human heart and soul have an infinite capacity to love. Marriage is not as much about love as it is about commitment. It is completely possible to love more than one woman and choose only to commit one's self to one woman. In fact, a person who can do that would make a far superior husband than a man who could only love one person.
|

07-06-2009, 09:41 PM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,503
Thanks: 415
Thanked 978 Times in 555 Posts
Laughs: 507
Laughs at 728 Times in 332 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbs2763
so I'm on fries and you are on the shake machine? lol
|
 And don't you dare yell at me to "shake it, baby!"
__________________
We have been called as witnesses, not judge or jury.
|

07-07-2009, 09:16 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,935
Thanks: 3,058
Thanked 2,528 Times in 1,832 Posts
Laughs: 493
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError
That's complete and utter nonsense. What you state here implies that a man is only capable of loving one woman at a time, which entirely nullifies the practice of polygamy. It would mean that when the Lord commanded polygamy, he was commanding men to take wives and not to love them, which is an absurd premise.
The human heart and soul have an infinite capacity to love. Marriage is not as much about love as it is about commitment. It is completely possible to love more than one woman and choose only to commit one's self to one woman. In fact, a person who can do that would make a far superior husband than a man who could only love one person.
|
I have to agree...when we touch the soul of another through affection, our souls become one - call it true love -. We can love more than one...
__________________
"Moving Forward...together!"
|

07-08-2009, 08:58 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 29
Posts: 3,612
Thanks: 1,281
Thanked 1,246 Times in 741 Posts
Laughs: 1,219
Laughs at 929 Times in 487 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverafter
Somehow I don't think the Church wants everyone to be sealed to all their former boyfriends & girlfriends that they had before they got married. I do Genealogy & it's easy for things like the above to slip through & be done but it doesn't make it valid. And if Abe was a good & faithful husband I'm sure he wasn't still in love with his former fiance after he married Mary Todd. And if he did secretly still keep feelings alive for a former flame while married to someone else, then that would probably make him unworthy for either marriage.
|
Oh my freaking gosh. Will you stop judging everyone's worthiness to be married already?
__________________
If evolution really works, how come mothers only have two hands? -- Milton Berle
Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed. -- C.S. Lewis
|

07-08-2009, 12:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 730
Thanks: 72
Thanked 339 Times in 225 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 30 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
back to the original query. The short answer is no. What if a husband and wife are sealed, but the husband dies shortly after. Then she remarries, has a full and complete life with husband number 2 complete with kids and grandkids. Should she be forced to be with her first husband because he was sealed to her, abandoning a lifetime with another man? I think not.
|

07-10-2009, 04:44 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 128
Thanks: 0
Thanked 41 Times in 27 Posts
Laughs: 1
Laughs at 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError
That's complete and utter nonsense. What you state here implies that a man is only capable of loving one woman at a time, which entirely nullifies the practice of polygamy. It would mean that when the Lord commanded polygamy, he was commanding men to take wives and not to love them, which is an absurd premise.
|
But there can be different kinds of love... say a man is married to one woman, his "true love," and is commanded to take more wives. Does that mean he'll fall romantically in love with all of them? Or perhaps that he'll love them in a different way? It's still love, and caring, and affection, but surely it doesn't mean he'll be head over heels in love with all of them. Like, the difference between loving someone and being in love with them.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.
|