|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

07-05-2009, 07:12 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 7,053
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,380 Times in 960 Posts
Laughs: 249
Laughs at 1,324 Times in 677 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytebear
In the case of Alger, the supposed relationship occurred in 1833, when she lived with the Smith's and got pregnant. The problem I have is that Joseph never even mentioned plural marriage until 1838,
|
From the Wikipedia (with citation links):
According to George D. Smith, Alger's marriage to Smith may have been attested by several contemporaries at the time, including Emma Smith, Warren Parish, Oliver Cowdery, and Heber C. Kimball, [9] even though publicly the leadership of the church, including Joseph Smith and Emma, [10] denied throughout their lives that Joseph Smith had been a polygamist. [11][12][13]
-------------------------
__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
|

07-05-2009, 08:22 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 99
Thanks: 36
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
this can be such a stumbling block for so many people in their faith. I completely agree with Anatess on this subject. I have heard of different reasons concerning why polygamy was instituted. I don't say that any of them are doctrinal or any of them are false. But I mostly allude to the idea that poligamy was a method, set by the Lord to increase the population of the Saints.
I'm sure there were alot of mistakes made. The early saints made many mistakes in a number of ways, because of the lack of comprehension of doctrines and lack of faith - or simply the weakness of men. But we can't deny the heritage of faith they have left us behind. Joseph Smith will be held responsible before the Lord for the things he has done, and it isn't for us to make that judgement. Without a question in mind, I know that he is a prophet of God.
At any case, I think we should be placing our priority of lissening and following the prophets that we have today. They were prepared for us, and for our time. Just as Joseph was prepared for them and for their time.
Last edited by Ezequiel; 07-05-2009 at 08:26 PM.
|

07-05-2009, 09:19 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 29
Posts: 3,612
Thanks: 1,281
Thanked 1,246 Times in 741 Posts
Laughs: 1,219
Laughs at 929 Times in 487 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by anatess
When I was investigating the Church and I first heard of the practice of polygamy, I never had any problem understanding the Lord's purpose for it. My grandmother got widowed in World War 2 - around 1944. She had 3 kids at this time, the youngest only 4 years old. She had to send her children kicking and screaming to the nunnery because it was just impossible for her to take care of them. Women in 1944 in the Philippines have no means to support themselves as they cannot work, cannot own property, etc. etc.
Here we are talking about the 1830's - over a century earlier than World War 2. With the early history of the LDS church, I can completely feel the desperation of these faithful women who have lost their husbands in massacres, etc. I would think that the Lord desired that these women stay in LDS families and be supported by upstanding priesthood holders. It is also one way for the Church to increase in member population in so short a time before all the males get killed! Polygamy to me makes sense. But then, if you see my other posts in a different thread, I am about the only one in this planet that do not immediately attach sexual relations to a relationship between opposite genders. I have no problem understanding that many of these polygamous relationships are not for the purpose of sex but for protection.
|
Very well stated. Thank you. Regarding your closing comments, you're not the only one, but there aren't too many out there.
__________________
If evolution really works, how come mothers only have two hands? -- Milton Berle
Now the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed. -- C.S. Lewis
|

07-05-2009, 10:41 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 730
Thanks: 72
Thanked 339 Times in 225 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 30 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moksha
From the Wikipedia (with citation links):
According to George D. Smith, Alger's marriage to Smith may have been attested by several contemporaries at the time, including Emma Smith, Warren Parish, Oliver Cowdery, and Heber C. Kimball, [9] even though publicly the leadership of the church, including Joseph Smith and Emma, [10] denied throughout their lives that Joseph Smith had been a polygamist. [11][12][13]
-------------------------
|
Emma Smith denied polygamy ever with Smith, and said it was Young who started it up, but I think she may have believed in the affair (but I think she was mistaken). As to other testimonies, several church leaders after the move to Utah attempted to bolster the idea of polygamy by gathering testimonies of Smith's involvement in the practice. The Community of Christ (RLDS) historically have denied Smith's involvement completely, so it was a battle in the late 1800s as to who was right which is where I believe many of those testimonies come from. So I can see how the Alger story got made to be part of the "wives" list, but I don't believe them.
Last edited by bytebear; 07-05-2009 at 10:44 PM.
|

07-06-2009, 09:48 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,021
Thanks: 871
Thanked 988 Times in 644 Posts
Laughs: 23
Laughs at 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
There's no evidence he even slept with all his wives. I believe he didn't, especially the ones underaged.
We tend to think others see things the same way we do. It's called projecting. It is apparent from my studies that Joseph Smith hated the thought of polygamy, and he only did so because he was commanded to. Also, he knew the problem it was going to cause in the church and that's why it took him several years to make it known.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Justice For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-06-2009, 11:46 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,135 Times in 728 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 289 Times in 158 Posts
|
|
Frankly, for someone of Smith's charisma and influence, there were easier ways to satisfy an active libido than to marry every hottie that came along.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-06-2009, 12:10 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,814
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 1,737 Times in 1,014 Posts
Laughs: 285
Laughs at 437 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy
Frankly, for someone of Smith's charisma and influence, there were easier ways to satisfy an active libido than to marry every hottie that came along.
|
Yeah right....and have you seen the pics of some of the women??!!  
__________________
We've got nothing to fear...but fear itself?
Not pain, not failure, not fatal tragedy?
Not the faulty units in this mad machinery?
Not the broken contacts in emotional chemistry?
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bytor2112 For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-06-2009, 12:45 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,135 Times in 728 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 289 Times in 158 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytor2112
|
Oh, I am SO not going there . . .
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-06-2009, 12:57 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 7,053
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,380 Times in 960 Posts
Laughs: 249
Laughs at 1,324 Times in 677 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytor2112
|
I think the average standard of beauty was different throughout the 19th Century.
__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
|

07-06-2009, 01:12 PM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 4,307
Thanks: 755
Thanked 2,034 Times in 1,159 Posts
Laughs: 264
Laughs at 464 Times in 295 Posts
|
|
Even Joseph Smith was reluctant to practice polygamy. It took an angel with a sword to cause him to finally do it. The key is, God sometimes demands tough things from us. Do you think that when Abraham went to sacrifice his son, Isaac, he was following God, or just wishing to copy the pagan gods in the area, who frequently demanded the sacrifice of a child?
Those involved in plural marriage, for the vast majority of them, gained a spiritual testimony of it. Some had major visions regarding it, such as Vilate Kimball. When Heber C. Kimball was commanded to find a young wife and not tell his beloved Vilate about it (as a test), he became very ill. She asked him what was wrong, and he told her to pray about it, as he couldn't say. She saw in vision, not only Heber's second wife, but many of the wives he eventually would have. She went back to his bed, told him to get up and get married. Was it easy for either of them? No. But they were extremely faithful and obedient to God's command.
Very very few of the teachings of any of the prophets have been refuted over the years. Most of them have been viewed more as opinions, rather than official statements. At this site, the Church tells us how to know the difference between core doctrine, regular doctrine, and occasional teachings of leaders (Approaching Mormon Doctrine).
__________________
Rameumptom: A Holy Stand or Podium, where I can pontificate to my heart's delight.
rameumptom.weebly.com
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rameumptom For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 PM.
|