|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

08-25-2009, 06:19 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint Lucia
Posts: 735
Thanks: 78
Thanked 245 Times in 166 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tubaloth For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-30-2009, 12:42 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
This still leaves some questions as to the keys, but answers the hypothetical "what if the twelve" scenario.
"Suppose that Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G Williams
had been taken away or had apostatized, as one of them did
soon after the revelation I have referred to was given, and
there had been only Joseph Smith left of the First Presidency,
would he alone have had authority to set in order
the Kingdom of God on the earth? Yes. Again Suppose
that eleven of the Twelve had been taken away by the
power of the Adversary, that one Apostle has the same
power that Joseph had, and could preach, baptize, and set
in order the whole Kingdom of God upon the earth, as
much so as the Twelve, were they all together. Again * If
in the providence of God he should permit the enemy to
destroy these two first Quorums, and then destroy the
Quorum of the Seventy, all but one man, what is his po\ver?
It would be to go and preach, baptize, confirm, lay on
hands, ordain, set in order, build up, and establish the whole
Kingdom of God as it is now Suppose the enemy had
power to destroy all but one of the High Priests from the
face of the earth, what would that one possess in the power
of his Priesthood? He would have power and authority to
go and preach, baptize, confirm, ordain, and set in order the
Kingdom of God in all its perfection of the earth Could he
do this without revelation? No Could the Seventies? No.
Could the Twelve? No And we ask, could Joseph Smith
or the First Presidency do this without revelation?
N*o Not one of them could do such a work without revelation
direct from God I can go still further Whoever is
ordained to the office of an Elder to a certain degree possesses
the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood, and suppose
only one Elder should be left on the earth, could he go and
set in order the Kingdom of God ? Yes, by revelation" Brigham Young JD 9 88
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to lucidluck For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-30-2009, 11:51 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,935
Thanks: 3,058
Thanked 2,528 Times in 1,832 Posts
Laughs: 493
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
|
|
The answer is already been provided in the article.
__________________
"Moving Forward...together!"
|

08-30-2009, 01:49 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 66
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy
...what was the purpose of the 1843/1844 meeting between Joseph and the 12 where he (apparently) specifically transferred keys to them that they (presumably) had not already held?
|
Council of Fifty. Of which Alma Dayer LeBaron was the last living member.
|

08-30-2009, 06:52 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,135 Times in 728 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 289 Times in 158 Posts
|
|
Could you elucidate, Mason?
Wikipedia says that Alma Dayer LeBaron wasn't born until 1886; and I'm not aware that the meeting to which I refer included anyone besides the Q of 12.
|

08-30-2009, 07:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 6,094
Thanks: 1,906
Thanked 1,401 Times in 742 Posts
Laughs: 727
Laughs at 612 Times in 301 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deseretgov
Well if you study the Succession Crisis you can see that it really wasn't clear right after Joseph Smith died. Most of the church followed James Strang rather than Brigham Young.
|
 This is not accurate. The majority of Saints followed Brigham to Utah.
Strang's schism of the Church did grow into a significant following, but after his murder, it dissipated. However, there are still members of that schism today.
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Elphaba
__________________
We can't change the country. Let us change the subject. Stephen Dedalus, Ulysses
Last edited by Elphaba; 08-30-2009 at 07:16 PM.
|

08-30-2009, 07:19 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 66
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy
Could you elucidate, Mason?
Wikipedia says that Alma Dayer LeBaron wasn't born until 1886; and I'm not aware that the meeting to which I refer included anyone besides the Q of 12.
|
My apologies. I meant Benjamin F. Johnson, not his grandson Alma LeBaron.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mason For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-30-2009, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,191
Thanks: 41
Thanked 708 Times in 432 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 271 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
Originally there was no clear understanding how succession should work. There were various possibilities and claims on succession: Hyrum, who was the Patriarch and Assistant President likely would have taken over if he was not killed. Since both Joseph and Hyrum were gone, who would take charge was a mystery. Potential candidates were:
Samuel Smith
Joseph Smith III
Sidney Rigdon
William Marks, President of the Nauvoo High Council
Brigham Young as the President of the Twelve
The Quorum of the Anointed
The Council of Fifty
etc.
Had Brigham Young not been the President of the Twelve and the dominant personality in the Church at the time, it is quite possible that someone else, other than the presiding apostle would have succeed Joseph.
When Brigham Young died, clear succession still had not been figured out. John Taylor didn't become president until 3 years after Brigham Young's death.
__________________
There is nothing more pathetic than the anti anti-mormon Colonel Louis/Lewis Tucker
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Snow For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-30-2009, 07:48 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 66
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow
Originally there was no clear understanding how succession should work. There were various possibilities and claims on succession: Hyrum, who was the Patriarch and Assistant President likely would have taken over if he was not killed. Since both Joseph and Hyrum were gone, who would take charge was a mystery. Potential candidates were:
Samuel Smith
Joseph Smith III
Sidney Rigdon
William Marks, President of the Nauvoo High Council
Brigham Young as the President of the Twelve
The Quorum of the Anointed
The Council of Fifty
etc.
Had Brigham Young not been the President of the Twelve and the dominant personality in the Church at the time, it is quite possible that someone else, other than the presiding apostle would have succeed Joseph.
When Brigham Young died, clear succession still had not been figured out. John Taylor didn't become president until 3 years after Brigham Young's death.
|
Some theorize that is the very reason why the Patriarch of the Church was dissolved in the late 70's; To tie up old loose ends, especially regarding lineal descendants of the Smith family.
|

08-30-2009, 07:50 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,191
Thanks: 41
Thanked 708 Times in 432 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 271 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason
Some theorize that is the very reason why the Patriarch of the Church was dissolved in the late 70's; To tie up old loose ends, especially regarding lineal descendants of the Smith family.
|
I didn't know that.
Thanks
__________________
There is nothing more pathetic than the anti anti-mormon Colonel Louis/Lewis Tucker
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 PM.
|