Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 06:19 PM
tubaloth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saint Lucia
Posts: 735
Thanks: 78
Thanked 245 Times in 166 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 13 Times in 7 Posts
Default

(7-1) The Lord Has Established the Order of Succession
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tubaloth For This Useful Post:
Just_A_Guy (08-26-2009)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 12:42 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

This still leaves some questions as to the keys, but answers the hypothetical "what if the twelve" scenario.

"Suppose that Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G Williams
had been taken away or had apostatized, as one of them did
soon after the revelation I have referred to was given, and
there had been only Joseph Smith left of the First Presidency,
would he alone have had authority to set in order
the Kingdom of God on the earth? Yes. Again Suppose
that eleven of the Twelve had been taken away by the
power of the Adversary, that one Apostle has the same
power that Joseph had, and could preach, baptize, and set
in order the whole Kingdom of God upon the earth, as
much so as the Twelve, were they all together. Again * If
in the providence of God he should permit the enemy to
destroy these two first Quorums, and then destroy the
Quorum of the Seventy, all but one man, what is his po\ver?
It would be to go and preach, baptize, confirm, lay on
hands, ordain, set in order, build up, and establish the whole
Kingdom of God as it is now Suppose the enemy had
power to destroy all but one of the High Priests from the
face of the earth, what would that one possess in the power
of his Priesthood? He would have power and authority to
go and preach, baptize, confirm, ordain, and set in order the
Kingdom of God in all its perfection of the earth Could he
do this without revelation? No Could the Seventies? No.
Could the Twelve? No And we ask, could Joseph Smith
or the First Presidency do this without revelation?
N*o Not one of them could do such a work without revelation
direct from God I can go still further Whoever is
ordained to the office of an Elder to a certain degree possesses
the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood, and suppose
only one Elder should be left on the earth, could he go and
set in order the Kingdom of God ? Yes, by revelation" Brigham Young JD 9 88
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lucidluck For This Useful Post:
Just_A_Guy (08-30-2009)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 11:51 AM
Hemidakota's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,935
Thanks: 3,058
Thanked 2,528 Times in 1,832 Posts
Laughs: 493
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
Default

The answer is already been provided in the article.
__________________
"Moving Forward...together!"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 01:49 PM
Mason's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 66
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy View Post
...what was the purpose of the 1843/1844 meeting between Joseph and the 12 where he (apparently) specifically transferred keys to them that they (presumably) had not already held?
Council of Fifty. Of which Alma Dayer LeBaron was the last living member.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 06:52 PM
Just_A_Guy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,135 Times in 728 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 289 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Could you elucidate, Mason?

Wikipedia says that Alma Dayer LeBaron wasn't born until 1886; and I'm not aware that the meeting to which I refer included anyone besides the Q of 12.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 07:11 PM
Elphaba's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 6,094
Thanks: 1,906
Thanked 1,401 Times in 742 Posts
Laughs: 727
Laughs at 612 Times in 301 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Elphaba Send a message via MSN to Elphaba
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deseretgov View Post
Well if you study the Succession Crisis you can see that it really wasn't clear right after Joseph Smith died. Most of the church followed James Strang rather than Brigham Young.
This is not accurate. The majority of Saints followed Brigham to Utah.

Strang's schism of the Church did grow into a significant following, but after his murder, it dissipated. However, there are still members of that schism today.

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints

Elphaba
__________________
We can't change the country.
Let us change the subject.
Stephen Dedalus,
Ulysses

Last edited by Elphaba; 08-30-2009 at 07:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 07:19 PM
Mason's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 66
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy View Post
Could you elucidate, Mason?

Wikipedia says that Alma Dayer LeBaron wasn't born until 1886; and I'm not aware that the meeting to which I refer included anyone besides the Q of 12.
My apologies. I meant Benjamin F. Johnson, not his grandson Alma LeBaron.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mason For This Useful Post:
Just_A_Guy (08-30-2009)
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 07:42 PM
Snow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,191
Thanks: 41
Thanked 708 Times in 432 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 271 Times in 113 Posts
Default

Originally there was no clear understanding how succession should work. There were various possibilities and claims on succession: Hyrum, who was the Patriarch and Assistant President likely would have taken over if he was not killed. Since both Joseph and Hyrum were gone, who would take charge was a mystery. Potential candidates were:

Samuel Smith
Joseph Smith III
Sidney Rigdon
William Marks, President of the Nauvoo High Council
Brigham Young as the President of the Twelve
The Quorum of the Anointed
The Council of Fifty
etc.

Had Brigham Young not been the President of the Twelve and the dominant personality in the Church at the time, it is quite possible that someone else, other than the presiding apostle would have succeed Joseph.

When Brigham Young died, clear succession still had not been figured out. John Taylor didn't become president until 3 years after Brigham Young's death.
__________________
There is nothing more pathetic than the anti anti-mormon Colonel Louis/Lewis Tucker
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Snow For This Useful Post:
Just_A_Guy (08-30-2009)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 07:48 PM
Mason's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 66
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow View Post
Originally there was no clear understanding how succession should work. There were various possibilities and claims on succession: Hyrum, who was the Patriarch and Assistant President likely would have taken over if he was not killed. Since both Joseph and Hyrum were gone, who would take charge was a mystery. Potential candidates were:

Samuel Smith
Joseph Smith III
Sidney Rigdon
William Marks, President of the Nauvoo High Council
Brigham Young as the President of the Twelve
The Quorum of the Anointed
The Council of Fifty
etc.

Had Brigham Young not been the President of the Twelve and the dominant personality in the Church at the time, it is quite possible that someone else, other than the presiding apostle would have succeed Joseph.

When Brigham Young died, clear succession still had not been figured out. John Taylor didn't become president until 3 years after Brigham Young's death.
Some theorize that is the very reason why the Patriarch of the Church was dissolved in the late 70's; To tie up old loose ends, especially regarding lineal descendants of the Smith family.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 07:50 PM
Snow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,191
Thanks: 41
Thanked 708 Times in 432 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 271 Times in 113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason View Post
Some theorize that is the very reason why the Patriarch of the Church was dissolved in the late 70's; To tie up old loose ends, especially regarding lineal descendants of the Smith family.
I didn't know that.

Thanks
__________________
There is nothing more pathetic than the anti anti-mormon Colonel Louis/Lewis Tucker
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.