Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Social Network Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 11:25 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jonathan.plumb
Default Your thoughts on Desiring multiple wives

Let's start with a brief (very brief) history of where monogamy comes from. I heard several rumors so I decided to research this topic myself. In a nutshell, monogamy was introduced by the Romans in a misbelief about why Catholic Priests were unable to be married. The Romans, several years after the Catholics instituded their policy for Priests to be unmarried, believed that the reason this was instituted was so that Priests could be "Married to God." At that point in time, it became popular belief that in order to be the most righteous, you could not have a spouse and that sexual relations was might as well be a sin. Somehow in all that mess, a law was instituded that basically said that IF you decide to get married, it can only be to increase the power of Rome, and even then you can only have 1 wife. And so Monogamy was born. However, the REAL reason that Priests were not allowed to be married was because there was a fluke of priests that were trying to give part of the church to their sons as an inheritance, which of course the church forbade, and caused all sorts of problems.... The doctrine of monogamy was carried over when Rome fell into all those parts of the world, and since the original settlers of America were from that part of the world, many of their core laws came with them.

I don't remember EXACTLY off the top of my head, but there's something like 150+ recognized cultures in the world, and only 13 of them (give or take a couple) practice Monogamy. It is actually a very small belief system.

Now we know that almost all of the Biblical prophets and many of our LDS prophets had more than one wife up until the 1900s when the US instituted stricter laws against it, and to conform with the laws (so we wouldn't get driven out of the promised land), we received revelation to stop practicing plural marriage.

However, as far as I've found, plural marriage is STILL a celestial law, although it is temorarily not being practiced (just like drinking wine, the law of consecration, etc .... we're just not "ready" for them at this time).

Now that all my mumbo jumbo is done, let me move on:

Because of US laws, many people who are married who "look on" another woman get a feeling of guilt because often it can lead to illegal practices which obviously we don't support. HOWEVER, is there any actual "sin" or what-not related to desiring to have more than one wife?

Just to clarify, I love my wife more than anything on this planet, and I would never want to substitute her or get rid of her or anything like that. She is a perfect angel in my eyes. However, I still find beauty in ALL women (regardless of race, weight, etc), and maybe I'm just trying to justify my "looking on other women," but I've researched it, and prayed about it, and find no fault. But others try to make me feel guilty, that is why I pose the topic to you guys.

Your thoughts?
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 11:34 AM
Just_A_Guy's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 6,493
Thanks: 3,127
Thanked 4,322 Times in 2,408 Posts
Laughs: 913
Laughs at 1,085 Times in 540 Posts
Default

I think Jacob 2 is clear. Whatever other cultures do, the default among the Lord's people is "no, unless God says yes".

Looking on women is fine, unless there's lust involved. Again, see Jacob 2. The only one who can tell you if you're looking on women "with lust"--and, therefore, sinning--is you.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
Maxel (09-23-2009), MsQwerty (09-27-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 11:45 AM
ryanh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 998
Thanks: 559
Thanked 803 Times in 438 Posts
Laughs: 69
Laughs at 73 Times in 36 Posts
Default

The desire is of the 'natural man' part of us. This life is the time allotted to conquer the natural man.

If it’s illegal, if it’s not commanded, there is no use in looking at other cultures (or lustfully at other women for that matter).
__________________
Tis easy enough to be pleasant, When life flows along like a song; But the man worth while is the one who will smile when everything goes dead wrong. Ella Wheeler Wilcox


God does notice us, and he watches over us. But it is usually through another person that he meets our needs. Therefore, it is vital that we serve each other. Spencer W. Kimball

Last edited by ryanh; 09-23-2009 at 11:49 AM.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 11:59 AM
Loudmouth_Mormon's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 6,307
Thanks: 3,392
Thanked 4,863 Times in 2,413 Posts
Laughs: 541
Laughs at 1,360 Times in 571 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathan.plumb View Post
monogamy was introduced by the Romans

there's something like 150+ recognized cultures in the world, and only 13 of them (give or take a couple) practice Monogamy. It is actually a very small belief system.
I'm gonna need some sources there, friend. I assume you're getting this from Margaret Mead and that "Myth of Monogamy" book, but want to make sure. Exactly what sources did you research?

LM
__________________
If I were rich, I'd have the time that I lack, to sit in the synagogue and pray.
And maybe have a seat by the Eastern wall.
And I'd discuss the holy books with the learned men, several hours every day.
That would be the sweetest thing of all.

Ohhh....
If I were a rich man...
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 12:16 PM
ploomf's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United States -
Religion: Christian
Posts: 294
Thanks: 370
Thanked 173 Times in 92 Posts
Laughs: 322
Laughs at 147 Times in 68 Posts
Default

I'm not sure where the OP got his information LM but according to the Ethnographic Atlas Codebook of the 1231 societies noted, 186 were monogamous. 453 had occasional polygamy, 588 had more frequent polygamy, and 4 had polyandry.
__________________
Build a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don't want to do it.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ploomf For This Useful Post:
Generally_Me (09-23-2009), Loudmouth_Mormon (09-23-2009)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 12:32 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jonathan.plumb
Default

I don't have any sources, it was Googled research nearly a year ago. But I think you're right, I was thinking 150+ and 13-ish, but 1231 and 186 are pretty close to 10-times the numbers I was thinking, but the ratio is similar.

However, the history of monogamy is not a "secret" and I'm sure you can find all sorts of sources easily on Google that verify the same information. I read I think 5 sources that all said the same thing, so it's not like I was looking at one source and taking it as truth.

As for "desire" being part of the natural man, I don't understand where your sources are from. If I recall correctly, polygamy was a lawful commandment from God for about 75 years, before "man" decided it was bad for us. I ask you one question, who's law rules in heaven? Man or God?
The Following User Says Thank You to jonathan.plumb For This Useful Post:
Loudmouth_Mormon (09-23-2009)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 12:33 PM
Misshalfway's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 6,016
Thanks: 3,467
Thanked 3,593 Times in 1,967 Posts
Laughs: 505
Laughs at 634 Times in 276 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathan.plumb View Post
Now that all my mumbo jumbo is done, let me move on:

Because of US laws, many people who are married who "look on" another woman get a feeling of guilt because often it can lead to illegal practices which obviously we don't support. HOWEVER, is there any actual "sin" or what-not related to desiring to have more than one wife?

Just to clarify, I love my wife more than anything on this planet, and I would never want to substitute her or get rid of her or anything like that. She is a perfect angel in my eyes. However, I still find beauty in ALL women (regardless of race, weight, etc), and maybe I'm just trying to justify my "looking on other women," but I've researched it, and prayed about it, and find no fault. But others try to make me feel guilty, that is why I pose the topic to you guys.

Your thoughts?
Looking at a person of the opposite sex and recognizing attractiveness or beauty or talent is not sinful. Looking upon a woman to lust after her IS. It's all about the desires of the heart. There is no doubt that many of us could be married to and happy with a variety of different people. It is the discipline of marriage including fidelity and honor that is important here.

Guilt. It's an interesting emotion. Others tend to be able to make us feel guilt for anything. Heck, sometimes I feel guilty cause I didn't clip as many good coupons as my SIL! It's rather ridiculous, don't you think, to let others and their opinions make us question ourselves so?

I think its better if we are the masters of our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Then we, together with the Spirit of God, can know if there is anything in our character that is amiss.

And what does this have to do with polygamy? They Lord requires our hearts to become oriented to righteousness no matter the circumstance.

Last edited by Misshalfway; 09-23-2009 at 12:36 PM.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 12:42 PM
Just_A_Guy's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 6,493
Thanks: 3,127
Thanked 4,322 Times in 2,408 Posts
Laughs: 913
Laughs at 1,085 Times in 540 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathan.plumb View Post
As for "desire" being part of the natural man, I don't understand where your sources are from. If I recall correctly, polygamy was a lawful commandment from God for about 75 years, before "man" decided it was bad for us. I ask you one question, who's law rules in heaven? Man or God?
Jacob 1:15
Quote:
And now it came to pass that the people of Nephi, under the reign of the second king, began to grow hard in their hearts, and indulge themselves somewhat in wicked practices, such as like unto David of old desiring many wives and concubines, and also Solomon, his son.
The Following User Says Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
Moksha (09-23-2009)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 01:12 PM
Loudmouth_Mormon's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 6,307
Thanks: 3,392
Thanked 4,863 Times in 2,413 Posts
Laughs: 541
Laughs at 1,360 Times in 571 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathan.plumb View Post
I ask you one question, who's law rules in heaven? Man or God?
Well, at the end of the day, I suppose my church urges godly laws here on earth too. So for right now, it doesn't really matter what position I could reason and evidence and historically document my way into, I'll be listening to my church leaders, who are seem to be currently quite entrenched in "one man married to one woman"-ism.

LM
(Dang - I didn't even get to use my "one fer lookin', one fer cookin'" joke...)
__________________
If I were rich, I'd have the time that I lack, to sit in the synagogue and pray.
And maybe have a seat by the Eastern wall.
And I'd discuss the holy books with the learned men, several hours every day.
That would be the sweetest thing of all.

Ohhh....
If I were a rich man...
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 01:15 PM
Moksha's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 9,435
Thanks: 560
Thanked 1,933 Times in 1,367 Posts
Laughs: 408
Laughs at 2,005 Times in 1,063 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanh View Post
The desire is of the 'natural man' part of us. This life is the time allotted to conquer the natural man.

If it’s illegal, if it’s not commanded, there is no use in looking at other cultures (or lustfully at other women for that matter).
This natual man behavior is usually accompanied by the phrase, "variety is the spice of life".
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 AM.

New Posts

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Social Network ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.