Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 04:45 PM
Dravin's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: United States -
Age: 25
Posts: 1,866
Thanks: 290
Thanked 518 Times in 375 Posts
Laughs: 109
Laughs at 493 Times in 245 Posts
Default

Shouldn't that be:

4. Go to meetings? (Not talking about sacrament here)
__________________
Hindsight is all well and good... until you trip.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 04:46 PM
Vort's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,684
Thanks: 287
Thanked 779 Times in 440 Posts
Laughs: 108
Laughs at 364 Times in 129 Posts
Default

That's more of an anti-mission, Dravin.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 04:49 PM
LDSVALLEY's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 190
Thanks: 57
Thanked 114 Times in 67 Posts
Laughs: 20
Laughs at 14 Times in 8 Posts
Default

4th mission of the church is tied into the 14th article of faith.

We will hold many and all meetings, we need to meet as often as possible in order to further discuss the same things discussed in other meetings. This is to cover those who don't write things down from the first five meetings something was said in and for High Priest how fall asleep after 10 minutes.

Any time three or more members are within 5 miles of each other a meeting shall be called. In order to better prepare for meetings members who attend meetings will receive training from a meeting training teacher. Pre meetings to discuss what will be discussed in meetings will be encouraged as will post meeting meetings to review the things covered in the meeting.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 04:52 PM
Loudmouth_Mormon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,132
Thanks: 816
Thanked 1,433 Times in 743 Posts
Laughs: 131
Laughs at 400 Times in 150 Posts
Default

I loved teaching out of that book, and was sad when they released me. Then 4 years later, I got to teach it again, and was sad again when they released me. Now as EQ sec, I get to teach it again!

Maybe a quarter to a third the stuff I have to say on this board is based on simple eternal truths that the Gospel Principles manual helped me figure out.

I managed to scoop the bishopric with the news. By the time they heard about the manuals, I already had mine, and was 4-5 chapters into it, comparing aginst the old version, marking every new word, every change. Not much has changed. Maybe the biggest change is including the Proclomation on the Family stuff (the old book came out just barely before the Proclomation), and clarifications on same-sex stuff. They shuffled some chapters around, added, changed, or removed some scritpural references here and there, de-emphasised some things and emphasized other things. Mostly minor.

LM
__________________
If I were rich, I'd have the time that I lack, to sit in the synagogue and pray.
And maybe have a seat by the Eastern wall.
And I'd discuss the holy books with the learned men, several hours every day.
That would be the sweetest thing of all.

Ohhh....
If I were a rich man...
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 05:53 PM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,080
Thanks: 52
Thanked 1,295 Times in 636 Posts
Laughs: 32
Laughs at 363 Times in 164 Posts
Default

There are a number of changes that are being made. To begin, it is my understanding that all the references to Mormon Doctrine have been removed. The new edition also, reportedly, downplays or eliminates some teachings such as whether or not faithful members can become gods, if God was always a god, heavenly parents, were Adam and Eve the progenitors of the human race, and whether or not the organization of the latter-day Church is complete.

Some have speculated that the changes reflect a move by the Church to distance itself from some of the more non-core beliefs that have been debated at great length here and throughout the past century and a half. Other interpret the changes as a desire to get back to basics. Personally, I think both are perfectly plausible solutions.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MarginOfError For This Useful Post:
Misshalfway (11-02-2009)
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 05:59 PM
Misshalfway's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 2,635
Thanked 2,775 Times in 1,585 Posts
Laughs: 455
Laughs at 593 Times in 292 Posts
Default

Quote:
Other interpret the changes as a desire to get back to basics. Personally, I think both are perfectly plausible solutions.
Well, it is the Gospel "Essentials" manual.

I was visiting another forum where these changes were being discussed. It seemed to many of the posters there that the church was backing away from its doctrine. Personally, I like the distancing from what I feel is intelligent speculation. I don't think the change compromises the churches position. Maybe it just reaffirms what we do know officially and what we don't.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 06:06 PM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,080
Thanks: 52
Thanked 1,295 Times in 636 Posts
Laughs: 32
Laughs at 363 Times in 164 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Misshalfway View Post
Well, it is the Gospel "Essentials" manual.

I was visiting another forum where these changes were being discussed. It seemed to many of the posters there that the church was backing away from its doctrine. Personally, I like the distancing from what I feel is intelligent speculation. I don't think the change compromises the churches position. Maybe it just reaffirms what we do know officially and what we don't.
That's a very good way to articulate it. Personally, I think people are putting too much stock in the book anyway. People who rely on Gospel Principles to identify doctrine are just waiting to be disappointed. The thing that needs to be made clear is that the only pure source of doctrine are in the Standard Works. The new manual should be used as a starting point for diving into the scriptures.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 06:07 PM
Misshalfway's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 5,638
Thanks: 2,635
Thanked 2,775 Times in 1,585 Posts
Laughs: 455
Laughs at 593 Times in 292 Posts
Default

Yeah. I agree.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 08:01 PM
Palerider's Avatar
Head Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 15,585
Thanks: 970
Thanked 1,186 Times in 852 Posts
Laughs: 1,567
Laughs at 1,174 Times in 709 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Palerider Send a message via Yahoo to Palerider
Default

This is the breakdown....Gospel Principles will be used on the second and third sunday......Teaching for our Times the 4th sunday.....1st sunday is usually left up to the local leaders.....
__________________
As Long As I Am Here......It Doesn't Matter Where Here Is.....

All great change in America begins at the dinner table......Ronald Reagan

Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.....Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2009, 09:15 PM
Snow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,190
Thanks: 41
Thanked 708 Times in 432 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 271 Times in 113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dravin View Post
Shouldn't that be:

4. Go to meetings? (Not talking about sacrament here)
I've often lammented, on a Sunday, trying to plan our family meals, when we had a morning block, meetings in the afternoon followed by other meetings in the night why the Church was so bent on doing everything they possibly could to prevent the family from being together.
__________________
There is nothing more pathetic than the anti anti-mormon Colonel Louis/Lewis Tucker
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Snow For This Useful Post:
Generally_Me (11-09-2009)
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.