Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Mormon Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:56 PM
Snow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,195
Thanks: 41
Thanked 709 Times in 433 Posts
Laughs: 9
Laughs at 271 Times in 113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bytebear View Post
God could have used any language He wanted, but He chose to use the language that Smith was most familiar with. If Smith spoke Spanish, we would have a very different translation. If Smith used the Ebonics translation of the Bible, the Book of Mormon would be in that form.
Correct me if I am wrong but Joseph Smith is the one person that knew completely how the translation process really worked and he said nothing about how he came to choose direct KJV language. We don't know if God told him to do it or if he just did it and God didn't correct him or if God even had an opinion.

If I am wrong, please reference the appropriate correction.
__________________
There is nothing more pathetic than the anti anti-mormon Colonel Louis/Lewis Tucker
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2009, 11:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 733
Thanks: 73
Thanked 339 Times in 225 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 30 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow View Post
Correct me if I am wrong but Joseph Smith is the one person that knew completely how the translation process really worked and he said nothing about how he came to choose direct KJV language. We don't know if God told him to do it or if he just did it and God didn't correct him or if God even had an opinion.

If I am wrong, please reference the appropriate correction.
You are correct in the decision for KJV or some other translation is unknown. Was it Smith or was it God. But I do know that later prophets have praised the KJV above other English translations. I think it is pretty clear that LDS leaders prefer it to other translations and feel Smith was inspired by it both in translation (of the BoM and the PoGP) and in a standard Bible version for the church to use.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2009, 03:23 PM
JohnnyRudick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,779
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 174 Times in 153 Posts
Laughs: 364
Laughs at 69 Times in 60 Posts
Default

I tried to give reasons for the use of the KJB in the Restoration of the Church in older posts.

Just a note

Bro. Rudick
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 04:58 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 83
Thanks: 40
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

This was a interesting read everywhere the bible translations are different but my old pastor told me in seminary years ago that "God speaks in any language to anyone "I suppose he meant doesn't matter what language God would let you know
I suppose people like to deal with semantics
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 05:37 PM
JohnnyRudick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,779
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 174 Times in 153 Posts
Laughs: 364
Laughs at 69 Times in 60 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avrham View Post
This was a interesting read everywhere the bible translations are different but my old pastor told me in seminary years ago that "God speaks in any language to anyone "I suppose he meant doesn't matter what language God would let you know
I suppose people like to deal with semantics
Actually no.
Most of us are referring to content not semantics.

It is an interesting fact to many that many translations differ in verses missing and even the actual changing of the meaning of texts.

Even among many English bibles the only justification for changing the meaning of a verse is "Better Manuscripts read. . ." and no reason to believe that the better manuscript was used as in another place they use the other reading of the first.

Check it out.

Bro. Rudick
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JohnnyRudick For This Useful Post:
Avrham (11-08-2009)
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New Posts


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Mormon Community ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.