Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Social Network Forums > LDS.NET Popular Forums > LDS Gospel Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 08:59 AM
Connie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 1,601
Thanks: 723
Thanked 858 Times in 482 Posts
Laughs: 131
Laughs at 203 Times in 120 Posts
Default Definition of Pornography

I came across this article in some of my reading. It is from the August 1989 Ensign, written by one R. Gary Shapiro (who, it seems, is a random member of the church who happened to write an article for the Ensign). I thought it was rather interesting and wondered about what others might think of it. Specifically, would you agree or disagree with his definition of pornography and why? Discuss.
__________________
"I long to accomplish a great and noble task, but it is my chief duty to accomplish small tasks as if they were great and noble." -Helen Keller
"By small and simple things are great things brought to pass." Alma 37:6

Last edited by Connie; 06-02-2011 at 09:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 10:23 AM
GB-UK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Age: 45
Posts: 389
Thanks: 69
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 12 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via MSN to GB-UK
Default

Totally disagree, PG 13 movies are porn? Don't think so.
__________________
The truth given us in scripture is that Jesus Christ is the example to man of all things concerning G-d – Which proves the LDS doctrine “As man is G-d once was {meaning that in the manner that man is; Jesus once came to earth and took upon himself} and as G-d is man may become {meaning that as Jesus was resurrected from the dead and so is alive today that man will also be resurrected and live}.
Why can't those claiming to be traditional Christians believe the truth?
The Traveler

My Blog
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 10:48 AM
pam's Avatar
pam pam is offline
Head Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 45,409
Thanks: 6,688
Thanked 12,653 Times in 7,688 Posts
Laughs: 3,785
Laughs at 8,909 Times in 4,019 Posts
Default

I can agree with it. What used to be R rated movies are now PG-13. I can also agree with his comments...are we guided by the world's definition?

Last edited by pam; 06-02-2011 at 11:16 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pam For This Useful Post:
Daybreak79 (06-02-2011), Jennarator (06-02-2011), KrazyKay (06-02-2011)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 11:14 AM
Vort's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 9,291
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 6,891 Times in 3,366 Posts
Laughs: 519
Laughs at 2,845 Times in 1,116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Connie View Post
I came across this article in some of my reading. It is from the August 1989 Ensign, written by one R. Gary Shapiro (who, it seems, is a random member of the church who happened to write an article for the Ensign). I thought it was rather interesting and wondered about what others might think of it. Specifically, would you agree or disagree with his definition of pornography and why? Discuss.
I pretty much agree with him. Our world is so saturated in pornography we don't even recognize it any more.

As a missionary in Italy in 1983, I was appalled by some of the billboards and posters I saw on the street. Women's naked breasts, and occasionally pudenda, were everywhere, and not just in the artwork. Men, too, were well-represented; I remember one poster that had a naked adult man standing facing the camera, his crotch being (barely) covered by the head of a naked boy standing in front of him. I remember wondering how far behind Europe my own country was following. Looks like about 30 years, though I suspect that gap is narrowing.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Vort For This Useful Post:
applepansy (06-02-2011), Daybreak79 (06-02-2011), Jennarator (06-02-2011), KrazyKay (06-02-2011), pam (06-02-2011), Seminarysnoozer (06-02-2011)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 11:18 AM
KrazyKay's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 513
Thanks: 369
Thanked 107 Times in 76 Posts
Laughs: 197
Laughs at 44 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pam View Post
are we guided by the world's definition?
This is a constant conflict between my husband and myself concerning his video games. I keep telling him that he should judge a video game based on if it promotes high values rather than just on the ratings. Some games are rated T but have inappropriate content that you play - such as violence, alcohol, drugs, or sexual not bad enough to make the game rated M but still not promoting high values. His argument is that it is rated T and so not bad.

To me it's the same with movies... we shouldn't look at the ratings so much, but rather at the content. If a movie interests us, we should first look at the rating, R is automatically out since a movie to get a R rating in today's world means the movie is very bad. Most PG-13 is also not good... some are pushing it, and some are ok. But in my opinion, it is between us and Heavenly Father which movies that are rated PG-13 we watch and which we don't. Most PG movies are ok, but some are not. I saw a PG movie once that had a making-out scene. In my opinion that is not ok and I would not allow my 11 year old to watch that movie with the making out scene. Lately I've also been a bit weary of some G movies. I saw one that had some hidden adult humor that kids probably wouldn't get but adults would. If memory serves me right, it was the Sponge Bob Square Pants movie.
__________________
Because there are different ideas, disputes will arise.
Because there are different ideas, the world will expand.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 11:19 AM
Backroads's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 4,975
Thanks: 7,414
Thanked 2,015 Times in 1,331 Posts
Laughs: 1,600
Laughs at 420 Times in 236 Posts
Default

I don't know if I can completely agree with his definition. Perhaps I think of the pornography too much in the legal sense of the term (that is something with which I agree right there). I think things can be offensive to the spirit, but it takes certain things to strike me as pornographic.

That being said, it's fine article and I have no issue with him desiring us to be selective of the entertainment offered by the world.
__________________
When you get to heaven, do not stop and stare. Chances are there'll be others surprised to see you there.


Storybook Girl
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 11:22 AM
pam's Avatar
pam pam is offline
Head Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 45,409
Thanks: 6,688
Thanked 12,653 Times in 7,688 Posts
Laughs: 3,785
Laughs at 8,909 Times in 4,019 Posts
Default

KrazyKay..I just noticed your signature. I LOVE it!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pam For This Useful Post:
Elphaba (06-04-2011), KrazyKay (06-02-2011)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 11:26 AM
Backroads's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 4,975
Thanks: 7,414
Thanked 2,015 Times in 1,331 Posts
Laughs: 1,600
Laughs at 420 Times in 236 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vort View Post
I pretty much agree with him. Our world is so saturated in pornography we don't even recognize it any more.

As a missionary in Italy in 1983, I was appalled by some of the billboards and posters I saw on the street. Women's naked breasts, and occasionally pudenda, were everywhere, and not just in the artwork. Men, too, were well-represented; I remember one poster that had a naked adult man standing facing the camera, his crotch being (barely) covered by the head of a naked boy standing in front of him. I remember wondering how far behind Europe my own country was following. Looks like about 30 years, though I suspect that gap is narrowing.
By other countries' standards, the US is really quite a prudish nation. And I have nothing wrong with other good-intentioned views of the human body. But I remember being in Europe and being unable to justify some of the things I saw.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KrazyKay View Post
This is a constant conflict between my husband and myself concerning his video games. I keep telling him that he should judge a video game based on if it promotes high values rather than just on the ratings. Some games are rated T but have inappropriate content that you play - such as violence, alcohol, drugs, or sexual not bad enough to make the game rated M but still not promoting high values. His argument is that it is rated T and so not bad.

To me it's the same with movies... we shouldn't look at the ratings so much, but rather at the content. If a movie interests us, we should first look at the rating, R is automatically out since a movie to get a R rating in today's world means the movie is very bad. Most PG-13 is also not good... some are pushing it, and some are ok. But in my opinion, it is between us and Heavenly Father which movies that are rated PG-13 we watch and which we don't. Most PG movies are ok, but some are not. I saw a PG movie once that had a making-out scene. In my opinion that is not ok and I would not allow my 11 year old to watch that movie with the making out scene. Lately I've also been a bit weary of some G movies. I saw one that had some hidden adult humor that kids probably wouldn't get but adults would. If memory serves me right, it was the Sponge Bob Square Pants movie.
My little sister and her boyfriend are very black-white when it comes to movie ratings, and I completely respect that. But I haven't been able to do that for years. So many sites these days will spell out what is wrong with a movie and give examples. It's great.

I so know what you mean about Spongebob. I've seen so many cartoons--even cartoons I loved--that struck me as very questionable.
__________________
When you get to heaven, do not stop and stare. Chances are there'll be others surprised to see you there.


Storybook Girl
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Backroads For This Useful Post:
KrazyKay (06-02-2011)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 12:39 PM
Vort's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 9,291
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 6,891 Times in 3,366 Posts
Laughs: 519
Laughs at 2,845 Times in 1,116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backroads View Post
By other countries' standards, the US is really quite a prudish nation.
By other people's standards, Mormons are insane. The standards of other people (or countries) don't concern me much.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vort For This Useful Post:
Daybreak79 (06-02-2011), KrazyKay (06-02-2011), ruthiechan (06-04-2011)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2011, 12:45 PM
saintish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree with the principle but i dont think there are any PG-13 movies that would ever have been rated X. I can see modern PG-13 movies being rated R but not X.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 PM.

New Posts

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Social Network ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.