|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

08-18-2008, 08:30 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,801
Thanks: 1,173
Thanked 1,730 Times in 1,008 Posts
Laughs: 284
Laughs at 432 Times in 198 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
The problem with a totally non-historical view is Joseph Smith lied. To me its impossible to defend Joseph Smiths integrity as a person if he made up Book of Mormon names. Unlike some i could not see the book inspired by God under such a scenario. Nor could i see Joseph Smith as an still inspired prophet. But even though that approach to the book has won over some in my religion i doubt they can defend the weaknesses in the approach. Though my members and leaders who hold to the view are trying to affirm the book as scripture as best they can.
|
So, which names did Joseph make up and please site your sources of evidence.
__________________
We've got nothing to fear...but fear itself?
Not pain, not failure, not fatal tragedy?
Not the faulty units in this mad machinery?
Not the broken contacts in emotional chemistry?
|

08-18-2008, 08:38 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,801
Thanks: 1,173
Thanked 1,730 Times in 1,008 Posts
Laughs: 284
Laughs at 432 Times in 198 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
To me the book would be a mythical testament to another Jesus.(2 Cor. 11:4) Joseph Smith would simply be a false prophet who lied in claiming the real Jesus spoke through him. To me the sacred allegory idea puts a positive spin on what would be a book inspired not by God, but by man, and maybe Satan. If i did not have MS i would if i accepted that idea be in SLC and Independence passing out tracts to my unsaved persons who still thought Joseph Smiths teachings worth upholding.
|
Joseph didn't claim that Jesus spoke through him....... it is interesting to me that if you think the BOM was a hoax and Joseph was a huxter, then why would you join a splinter group and not opt for orthodox christianity- so-called?
__________________
We've got nothing to fear...but fear itself?
Not pain, not failure, not fatal tragedy?
Not the faulty units in this mad machinery?
Not the broken contacts in emotional chemistry?
|

08-18-2008, 12:28 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 391
Thanked 300 Times in 211 Posts
Laughs: 114
Laughs at 38 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
bytor2112:
Quote:
|
...it is interesting to me that if you think the BOM was a hoax and Joseph was a huxter, then why would you join a splinter group and not opt for orthodox christianity- so-called?
|
Dale:
Quote:
|
I myself take the view the Book of Mormon is historical. But some in my church do not see it possible based on modern scholarship that the books historical.
|
bytor, I think you mis-understand what Dale is trying to say. Please re-read Post #17.
__________________
I'd rather be a could-be if I cannot be an are; because a could-be is a maybe who - is reaching for a star. I'd rather be a has-been than a might-have-been, by far; for a might have-been has never been, but a has was once an are. - Milton Berle
Sound, balanced teaching is a must. Our default should be to partake. Our default should be to live in joy, not condemnation. Our default should be to love, not to correct, to encourage, not to criticize. (Quote from prisonchaplain)
|

08-18-2008, 12:36 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,801
Thanks: 1,173
Thanked 1,730 Times in 1,008 Posts
Laughs: 284
Laughs at 432 Times in 198 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maureen
bytor2112: Dale:bytor, I think you mis-understand what Dale is trying to say. Please re-read Post #17.
|
I see....so he is presenting scenarios of what others think...not his personal views. Thanks for pointing that out....
__________________
We've got nothing to fear...but fear itself?
Not pain, not failure, not fatal tragedy?
Not the faulty units in this mad machinery?
Not the broken contacts in emotional chemistry?
|

08-18-2008, 01:30 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 7,025
Thanks: 365
Thanked 1,375 Times in 956 Posts
Laughs: 246
Laughs at 1,319 Times in 674 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale
He thought me deceived, but i know he would have thought me twice deceived if i had told him the book was just sacred allegory.
|
Doesn't matter what some naysayer thinks of your faith, so why should you care if he believes you are doubly rather than singularly deceived? Sacred Allegory is by my definition, literature that contains symbolic truth. This truth by its very nature is worthwhile. No need to be ashamed of it. Besides by its same nature, it is proof against prevailing evidence that its origins are not historical. It keeps its believers from needing to forever come to its defense from attacks as to its origin.
Quote:
|
To me continuing to say the book is inspired by God would be empty propaganda.
|
Who says that such allegory cannot have had some divine inspiration or is in itself not pleasing to God?
__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
|

08-18-2008, 02:14 PM
|
 |
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 4
Thanks: 16
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Ok, so now I understand that there are: LDS, RLDS, and FLDS.
Looks like I have a lot more research and praying ahead of me.
It seems a bit ironic to me that Joseph Smith founded these religions by praying about the numerous denominations/religions of his day. The result of that is 3 more options to explore.
Thanks for the responses!
ScriptureSearcher
|

08-18-2008, 03:49 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 391
Thanked 300 Times in 211 Posts
Laughs: 114
Laughs at 38 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
It seems a bit ironic to me that Joseph Smith founded these religions by praying about the numerous denominations/religions of his day. The result of that is 3 more options to explore.
|
Actually there's more than just 3, see link.
Quote:
This is a list of sects which consider themselves a part of Latter Day Saint Restorationism. All follow at least some of the teachings and revelations of Joseph Smith, Jr., publisher of the Book of Mormon in 1830. Latter Day Saint Restorationism had its largest schism after the Death of Joseph Smith, Jr. in 1844. Following Smith's death, the largest group of adherents followed Brigham Young, settled in Utah Territory and called themselves The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and denominations headquartered in the west are sometimes referred to as a "Rocky Mountain Saint" sects. Other groups remained in and around Nauvoo, Illinois and Independence, Missouri and are sometimes called a "Prairie Saint" sects.
List of sects in the Latter Day Saint movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
__________________
I'd rather be a could-be if I cannot be an are; because a could-be is a maybe who - is reaching for a star. I'd rather be a has-been than a might-have-been, by far; for a might have-been has never been, but a has was once an are. - Milton Berle
Sound, balanced teaching is a must. Our default should be to partake. Our default should be to live in joy, not condemnation. Our default should be to love, not to correct, to encourage, not to criticize. (Quote from prisonchaplain)
Last edited by Maureen; 08-19-2008 at 12:04 AM.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Maureen For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-18-2008, 06:58 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 132
Thanks: 43
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
You'll notice if you click on the links in the "notes" of the first in those links at the List of sects in the Latter Day Saint movement, that the LDS church comes up first.
But, really, it's all about faith.
You have to ask God what is true, and to find out for yourself through him.
|

08-19-2008, 01:18 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States -
Posts: 563
Thanks: 0
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I do not accuse Joseph Smith of fraud. Nor do those who hold the book is inspired by God, but not historical. It is not my opinion he made up the names. I feel myself he got the names from the plates.
I saw an advance copy of a new film by FAIR responding to Living Hope Ministries Bible vs. The Book of Mormon. I understand at FAIRS You Tube Channel the film will be online soon. That film adequately handles many archeological criticisms the book gets. I do not know when the DVD will get released.
It does not bother me what others think about my faith. my friend and i parted on good terms. I liked sharing with him Book of Mormon reliability evidences and answering his questions.
He said he brought on two separate occasions LDS missionaries to the true Lord. He said they were Evangelical Christians now. He said he felt promptings from the Holy Spirit to witness to them. I felt he needed to hear i felt Satan was pretending to be his Jesus and led him to vulnerable LDS missionaries. And he needed to be told point blank his Anti-Mormon trivia had answers. And i shared some answers for each point he tried to hit me with one after another.
I do not like debate much. Witnessing conversations where i am the target make me cringe. I hate contention. My interest in defending my beliefs is for self defense and helping others. I much prefer to study Anti-Mormon issues as a fun hobby. But i find if i am upfront about my membership in my church i get religious opposition.
|

08-20-2008, 04:01 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 132
Thanks: 43
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
You should never worry about religious opposition.
Let people worship God to their own dictates.
One can share the truth, but ultimately, it's up to the person to accept it or reject it.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 AM.
|