|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

08-02-2009, 06:19 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 848
Thanks: 120
Thanked 183 Times in 129 Posts
Laughs: 111
Laughs at 210 Times in 119 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubaloth
I thought that was implied in the way I explained it, but I guess not.
That was the point of me explaing about Eternal marrage.
|
I think they way you said it made it sound like you had to be married for eternity for all three levels of the celestial kingdom when in fact it's just the first degree.
Which brings up an interesting question in my mind. Do we have any other information regarding these three different degrees of "celestial glory"? When I first read that, my immediate impression was that it was referring to the telestial, terrestrial and celestial; clearly most people don't interprete it that way. It's not clear as to what it means at all - can we be sure there are definately three different degrees in the celestial kingdom?
|

08-02-2009, 06:42 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,380
Thanks: 1,480
Thanked 409 Times in 250 Posts
Laughs: 515
Laughs at 155 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahone
[...]can we be sure there are definately three different degrees in the celestial kingdom?
|
Yes, we can be sure.
I teach Valiants 9-12 in Primary. This was our lesson a couple of weeks ago:
__________________
~Sister Tough Grits
Life in the Church soon teaches us that the Lord does not ask us about our ability, but only our availability. And then, if we demonstrate our dependability, the Lord will increase our capability. ~Neal A. Maxwell
Blessed are those that can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused.
Last edited by Tough Grits; 08-02-2009 at 06:44 PM.
Reason: Format and styling :o)
|

08-02-2009, 07:02 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 7,045
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,379 Times in 959 Posts
Laughs: 249
Laughs at 1,321 Times in 674 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubaloth
Now to add on to that, in the Celestial Kingdom there are three sub degrees. They don't have a name, but I like to call them A, B, and C. (‘A’ being the highest).
|
I can't remember whether Emmanuel Swedenborg had a name for these sub-levels either, but in line with King James English (sort of), would it not be wise to call these A-eth, B-eth and C-eth?
__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Moksha For This Useful Post:
|
|

08-03-2009, 11:21 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 377
Thanks: 51
Thanked 148 Times in 85 Posts
Laughs: 7
Laughs at 14 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moksha
I can't remember whether Emmanuel Swedenborg had a name for these sub-levels either, but in line with King James English (sort of), would it not be wise to call these A-eth, B-eth and C-eth?
|
Don;t get me started on King James English
Last edited by mnn727; 08-03-2009 at 11:25 AM.
|

08-08-2009, 01:06 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 287
Thanks: 32
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluePlastic
I just want to clear up my own confusion about this, and also to understand it so I might use it in the book I'm writing that has a Mormon character in it.
So, I know that the highest level of heaven, the one you really want to get into, is the Celestial Kingdom. Do you have to be married to go there? (I think I heard that somewhere...)
And, what are the other levels? I'm not that clear on it, and the one site I read that "explained" it, I don't have much confidence in -- there's a lot of misinformation around. :P
|
Yeah, you are supposed to be married to get into Celestial.
If I remember correctly it is:
Celestial
Terrestrial (I was told Terre means middle)
Telestial (Which my dad told me would actually have some pretty crummy people in it)
Then Outer Darkness where the Sons of Perdition go. Before all of that though there is the spirit world and spirit prision where you wait for the second coming. You are in the spirit prision if you aren't mormon.
|

08-08-2009, 01:37 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 157
Thanks: 11
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Laughs: 1
Laughs at 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Why do you have to be married to make it to A-eth level?
What if you find the love of your life and she's not a member or dies before a sealing, are you just out of luck?
|

08-08-2009, 01:52 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 287
Thanks: 32
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EruditioSalvatus
Why do you have to be married to make it to A-eth level?
What if you find the love of your life and she's not a member or dies before a sealing, are you just out of luck?
|
My dad believes that he has tried to find a wife so he is all good, but according to the doctrine, you need to have ALL of the ordinances. Marriage is an ordinance as well.
|

08-08-2009, 09:10 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,135 Times in 728 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 289 Times in 158 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EruditioSalvatus
Why do you have to be married to make it to A-eth level?
What if you find the love of your life and she's not a member or dies before a sealing, are you just out of luck?
|
Because the "A-eth" level (and this is not a Mormon theological term--it's just an ad hoc word coined by Tubaloth and Moksha) involves creating new worlds and creating new people to live on them. The standard LDS view is that it takes two (a male and a female) to create a new person--even in the eternities.
Sealing can be done by proxy after death, and (generally speaking) would be retroactively effective provided that the during the deceased person's life he/she was, to the best of his/her ability, true to the degree of light and knowledge he/she had been given.
|

08-08-2009, 09:38 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 730
Thanks: 72
Thanked 339 Times in 225 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 30 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
As I understand it, there are two estates. The first estate was given in the pre-mortal life, and those who rejected it are sons of perdition. Those who accepted their first estate, entered the second estate, which is mortality. They were given bodies. We are in our second estate. Because of that, we are promised a level of glory. If we deny the Holy Ghost with a sure knowledge (a very difficult position to be in) we cannot lose our second estate. But, what level of glory we have depends on our commitment to Christ.
If we have no commitment to Christ, we receive telestial glory.
If we believe and accept Christ, we receive terrestrial glory.
If we covenant with Christ through baptism we receive celestial glory.
If we further covenant with Christ (temple ordinances) we raise our glory within the celestial kingdom.
If we still further our covenant, and enter covenant with a spouse, we receive the highest level of celestial glory.
Of course, celestial glory depends on our fulfilling the covenant.
|

08-09-2009, 01:22 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States -
Posts: 7,045
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,379 Times in 959 Posts
Laughs: 249
Laughs at 1,321 Times in 674 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy
The standard LDS view is that it takes two (a male and a female) to create a new person--even in the eternities.
|
Wouldn't it be a hoot if somehow the requirements for creation involved a multiple configuration for this creation instead? For example, What if it required a Man and a bunch of Sister-Wives? Wait before you say, "there goes Moksha on one of his Sci-Fi benders again", hear me out. This is not beyond possibility. After all, stranger things have happened. Think of the lion laying down with the lamb, an Octomom and my favorite from some years back, the Jackson-Presley wedding.
__________________
Jesus said, "The first in importance is, love the Lord God.'
And here is the second: 'Love others as well as you love yourself.'
There is no other commandment that ranks with these."
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 PM.
|