|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

09-21-2009, 08:01 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 44
Thanks: 36
Thanked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lattelady
The LDS church today teaches the virgin birth--are there members that still subscribe to the teachings of some of the former prophets that God the Father is the literal father of Jesus?
|
what's not "literal" about God being the Father through miraculous means?
|

09-21-2009, 08:09 PM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,504
Thanks: 415
Thanked 978 Times in 555 Posts
Laughs: 508
Laughs at 729 Times in 332 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lattelady
The LDS church today teaches the virgin birth--are there members that still subscribe to the teachings of some of the former prophets that God the Father is the literal father of Jesus?
|
I'm really curious why you would ask this question. Of course there are members who believe different things. Some choose to follow one prophet or leader, while others like to follow something from their own thoughts/beliefs.
I think it's clear what the church teaches--what members choose to believe is their choice.
__________________
We have been called as witnesses, not judge or jury.
|

09-21-2009, 08:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 730
Thanks: 72
Thanked 339 Times in 225 Posts
Laughs: 2
Laughs at 30 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
God the Father is the literal father of Jesus, but Mary was still a virgin.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bytebear For This Useful Post:
|
|

09-21-2009, 09:40 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United States -
Age: 56
Posts: 738
Thanks: 31
Thanked 162 Times in 114 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 66 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lattelady
It is taught and accepted as truth in most Christian denominations that Jesus was born of a virgin (Mary), a miraculous conception through the Spirit of God. What is the LDS view on Jesus birth? Was He born of a virgin, as taught in the Bible? Or was He the product of a physical union with God the Father (Elohim)?
|
We beleive what the Holy bible teaches.
|

09-21-2009, 10:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 391
Thanks: 163
Thanked 108 Times in 67 Posts
Laughs: 17
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
"For someone who doesn't know much about what our Church teaches, you sure seem to know alot"--
I'm not sure why you're saying that. What I know about the LDS church comes from living in Utah for 25 years. As you can imagine, as a non-member, I've heard about MANY differing teachings. As many differing teachings as I've encountered on this forum, 25 years has provided a great deal more...
Beefche, the reason I was asking that question was: it's interesting to hear what the majority of current LDS members believe on different doctrines. I have heard both teachings. As I've spent time in this forum, I've seen that current teaching trumps former teachings from former prophets. Now and then, I will run into people who choose to hang on to a former prophet's teaching. I just wondered what the common, most widely held belief was. I wasn't going to argue with you on what the most common belief was. I just wondered.
Last edited by lattelady; 09-21-2009 at 10:47 PM.
|

09-21-2009, 10:52 PM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 15,587
Thanks: 970
Thanked 1,186 Times in 852 Posts
Laughs: 1,568
Laughs at 1,174 Times in 709 Posts
|
|
All these LDS friends quoted Brigham Young to you etc..
__________________
As Long As I Am Here......It Doesn't Matter Where Here Is.....
All great change in America begins at the dinner table......Ronald Reagan
Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.....Ronald Reagan
|

09-21-2009, 11:12 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 391
Thanks: 163
Thanked 108 Times in 67 Posts
Laughs: 17
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Where have I quoted Brigham Young? Why are you questioning me? Do you realize that anyone can read books or the internet--books on LDS doctrine are not off limits to non-mombers. I've grown up around devout members all of my life and have very close LDS friends. I'm not speaking negatively about the Church. What is it that I'm doing that is bothering you?
|

09-22-2009, 09:42 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 315
Thanks: 644
Thanked 69 Times in 54 Posts
Laughs: 242
Laughs at 33 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Latte,
I grew up in the church, and in Utah, but I didn't know that "the church" taught God had carnal relations with Mary until a few months ago when I accidentally cruised onto an anti-Mormon website. It was news to me.
So I think it's safe to say that, that particular teaching is no longer being taught mainstream, and only by those who want to use it for whatever goal they are using it for. Mainstream Mormons believe that Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus. Whomever of your friends that are believing otherwise probably have other differences of opinion (such as, maybe, interpretation of the BoM, and how J. Smith accomplished that. Off the top of my head.)
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Generally_Me For This Useful Post:
|
|

09-22-2009, 10:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 391
Thanks: 163
Thanked 108 Times in 67 Posts
Laughs: 17
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
An honest question: was this a thought from way back, like in the 1800's? Someone else mentioned Brigham Young's name--was he the prophet who spoke about it? Please: I'm not playing dumb, I know this concept about Elohim being the literal father of Jesus had a place at one time in church history. I just wanted to know when the thought originated and when the concept died down or was replaced. I'm slowly learning how progressive prophecy works in the LDS faith (I'm not saying I agree with it, but I think I'm understanding your beliefs about it--I'm not here to bash your faith!).
|

09-22-2009, 11:22 PM
|
 |
Head Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 15,587
Thanks: 970
Thanked 1,186 Times in 852 Posts
Laughs: 1,568
Laughs at 1,174 Times in 709 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lattelady
Where have I quoted Brigham Young? Why are you questioning me? Do you realize that anyone can read books or the internet--books on LDS doctrine are not off limits to non-mombers. I've grown up around devout members all of my life and have very close LDS friends. I'm not speaking negatively about the Church. What is it that I'm doing that is bothering you?
|
Last time I looked....I can ask questions....why do you get all in a huff when someone asks????
__________________
As Long As I Am Here......It Doesn't Matter Where Here Is.....
All great change in America begins at the dinner table......Ronald Reagan
Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.....Ronald Reagan
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM.
|