|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

10-26-2009, 02:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 45
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy
No offense taken.
Per Mormon theology, Jesus was indeed God incarnate. Basically, there are three beings in the Mormon godhead--Elohim (God the Father), Jehovah (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit. All of them existed prior to the Creation; but only Elohim at that time had a physical body--the other two were spirits only; in the form of men but without physical substance (actually, there's a Mormon teaching that even spirit is a form of highly refined matter; but we can leave that aside for the present discussion). Moreover, the Being that most of the Old Testament prophets dealt with was, in fact, Jehovah.
The birth of Jesus represented Jehovah coming to earth in bodily form--so Jesus of Nazareth was indeed God incarnate. I'd be a little uncomfortable classifying Jesus as a "demi-god", because that would seem to imply that a) Jesus would remain forever as an "imperfect" sort of god, and b) Jesus' existence began at the time of His birth in Bethlehem. Neither notion, per Mormon theology, is correct.
|
I thought Mormon theology was that God the Father was a perfected/exalted man? How could Jesus be part of the godhead before He perfected Himself in this earthly life? I mean, I understand that you believe we have a "pre-mortal" existence, but I didn't think a man was "divine" until he had done his earthly time, so to speak.
I know you wouldn't say "demi-god" about Jesus, but again, I'm just trying to put it in terms I can understand.
|

10-26-2009, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,135 Times in 728 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 289 Times in 158 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatima
I thought Mormon theology was that God the Father was a perfected/exalted man? How could Jesus be part of the godhead before He perfected Himself in this earthly life? I mean, I understand that you believe we have a "pre-mortal" existence, but I didn't think a man was "divine" until he had done his earthly time, so to speak.
|
In my opinion, officially the Church has no good answer for this question at present. I am interested to see what explanations will be offered here; because so far every orthodox explanation I've seen creates more questions than it answers.
There were some ideas taught by early LDS leaders--but never formally adopted by the LDS Church--that could provide an answer, but I think most of us Mormons would look at those ideas as virtually heretical today.
Quote:
|
I know you wouldn't say "demi-god" about Jesus, but again, I'm just trying to put it in terms I can understand.
|
No problem, so long as you understand why Mormons would qualify such a classification.
__________________
Your lawyer in practice spends a considerable part of his life doing distasteful things for disagreeable people who must be satisfied, against an impossible time limit and with hourly interruptions, from other disagreeable people who want to derail the train; and for his blood, sweat, and tears he receives in the end a few unkind words to the effect that it might have been done better, and a protest at the size of his fee.
--William L. Prosser
Last edited by Just_A_Guy; 10-26-2009 at 02:53 PM.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
|
|

10-26-2009, 03:18 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I believe that the church states that Heavenly Father has a wife but other than that, I don't think the church has explicitly stated anything else.
But please, correct me if I'm wrong. I'm all about reading Gospel Doctrine!
|

10-26-2009, 11:36 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 526
Thanks: 53
Thanked 151 Times in 112 Posts
Laughs: 13
Laughs at 20 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatima
No, I was not hinting at anything. Just trying to figure out why God would have used another woman, as it were, to give birth to His Son.
|
Because God's wife cannot produce children with Physical bodies. Now we have no idea how the production of children in Heaven occurs but We do know that it results only in the production of spirit children. And God's wife was already involved in the creation of Jesus' spirit.
Quote:
|
If Jesus is not God Incarnate, as Trinitarian Christianity holds, then Jesus must've been half-and-half, I guess. A demi-god as in mythology.
|
Well Christ had to have the ability to remain sinless, which must be a godly power. He also had to have the ability to have immortality. That way he could suffer for all the sins of the world. If not he would have died in the garden. But He also had to have the mortal ability to die. Because he had to willingly give his own life. If we was purely immortal it would have been impossible for him to die. So in a way he was sort of half and half.
Quote:
|
I thought Mormon theology was that God the Father was a perfected/exalted man?
|
Some believe this. It does seem to be a natural conclusion to many of our actual doctrines.
Quote:
|
How could Jesus be part of the godhead before He perfected Himself in this earthly life?
|
Because being a God isn't a requirement to being in the God head. the Holy Spirit isn't a perfected mortal. he's only a spirit, yet he is still a part of the Godhead.
Hopefully some of that helped.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to deseretgov For This Useful Post:
|
|

11-02-2009, 07:19 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 942
Thanks: 262
Thanked 373 Times in 251 Posts
Laughs: 31
Laughs at 24 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deseretgov
Because God's wife cannot produce children with Physical bodies. Now we have no idea how the production of children in Heaven occurs but We do know that it results only in the production of spirit children. And God's wife was already involved in the creation of Jesus' spirit.
|
Each after their own kind... immortal begets immortal - mortal begets mortal... Even in her perfect form was unable to have children in Eden. She had to eat the fruit, pregnancy seems like the cursed way of having children... Mother is a word with meaning after meaning.
Jesus - the "only" begotten child - begotten through an handmaid...
Quote:
|
Well Christ had to have the ability to remain sinless, which must be a godly power. He also had to have the ability to have immortality. That way he could suffer for all the sins of the world. If not he would have died in the garden. But He also had to have the mortal ability to die. Because he had to willingly give his own life. If we was purely immortal it would have been impossible for him to die. So in a way he was sort of half and half.
|
correct - he had to be half mortal - Heavenly Mother is not mortal, a handmaid was needed...
Did I post this already? Abraham Isaac = Heavenly Father/Jesus... consider the roles of Sarah Hagar and who they represent
__________________
1 Cor 15:52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, ...we shall be changed.
|

11-02-2009, 09:56 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 45
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by changed
Each after their own kind... immortal begets immortal - mortal begets mortal... Even in her perfect form was unable to have children in Eden. She had to eat the fruit, pregnancy seems like the cursed way of having children... Mother is a word with meaning after meaning.
Jesus - the "only" begotten child - begotten through an handmaid...
correct - he had to be half mortal - Heavenly Mother is not mortal, a handmaid was needed...
Did I post this already? Abraham Isaac = Heavenly Father/Jesus... consider the roles of Sarah Hagar and who they represent 
|
From what do you induce that Eve could not have children in the garden? God told A and E to "be fruitful and multiply" before the fall, so clearly she could have borne children prior, but didn't for whatever reason.
Jesus was 1/2 mortal and 1/2 Divine? How can a Divine being be only 1/2 Divine? He was fully both, otherwise He would not have been able to accomplish all that He did.
So, then if your theology says that we are "spirit children" in the premortal existence as children of the Heavenly Father and some unnamed heavenly mother, and Jesus is our elder brother, why was Jesus not made by two earthly parents as we are? My understanding is that God and Jesus were what we are, and they are now what we are intended to be when we reach exaltation, is that correct?
So, why was it all done differently for Jesus?
|

11-02-2009, 10:34 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 5,646
Thanks: 2,642
Thanked 2,778 Times in 1,587 Posts
Laughs: 455
Laughs at 595 Times in 294 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatima
I thought Mormon theology was that God the Father was a perfected/exalted man? How could Jesus be part of the godhead before He perfected Himself in this earthly life? I mean, I understand that you believe we have a "pre-mortal" existence, but I didn't think a man was "divine" until he had done his earthly time, so to speak.
I know you wouldn't say "demi-god" about Jesus, but again, I'm just trying to put it in terms I can understand.
|
Disclaimer: This is not official doctrine. Only my current supposings on the subject.
We have been taught that Jesus is and was and always will be God. God the father is all powerful and all that too. We are taught officially that they are not progressing....not learning but the are in a perfectly righeous state of being while enjoying the blessings of eternal increase.....which I suppose could be characterized as part of eternal progression and what seems to define gods in the first place meaning that they go on. All other salvation has a ceiling to its capacity for increase.
I just read Abraham 3 yesterday, which is pretty deep stuff, but it seems that God lives in some unnamed place and that he governs from this place called Kolob and that there was a counsel of intelligences or spirit children of GOD and from amongst them he called and appointed the noble and great ones. One amongst them was chosen to be THE leader of this earth effort. That was Jesus. It also seems clear that all were good, but varying in levels of intelligence.
Jesus was the first spirit born of the Father. Is that alone what makes him special? It seems that he was chosen and that he understood what it meant to offer up his life and the partculars of eternal law that demanded justice be satisfied. He apparently understood and accomplished obedience and retained more intelligence than the rest of the intelligences as a result. It also seems clear that even with all his perfectness and Godhood status, he still needed to progress and get a body and contend with flesh and apparently be sired by God the father in order to have the physical power to perform the atonement and to choose it rather than just be killed. It also seems important that part of finishing the preparations unto the children of men , he had to report back to his father before Mary could touch him.
SO......what makes his progression different than ours? I don't know. Perhaps his progression is different than ours either because of the nature of his intelligence or because he simply was perfect in the pre earth life and was conincidentally the firstborn. It seems that we are different though, because we needed a savior and he did not. Apparently, you either progress by being saved or you progress by saving others. I don't see any other scenerio that works in my current understanding of the eternal progression model.
How's that for a brain dump?
Last edited by Misshalfway; 11-02-2009 at 10:38 AM.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Misshalfway For This Useful Post:
|
|

11-02-2009, 11:25 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,086
Thanks: 1,438
Thanked 303 Times in 175 Posts
Laughs: 124
Laughs at 18 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatima
From what do you induce that Eve could not have children in the garden? God told A and E to "be fruitful and multiply" before the fall, so clearly she could have borne children prior, but didn't for whatever reason.
|
I just read this wonderful article by Elder Bruce R. McConkie, "Christ and the Creation"
(Ensign, Jun 1982)
In this article he states, "Mortality, and procreation and death had their beginnings with the Fall. One of the most profound doctrinal declarations ever made fell from the lips of mother Eve. She said: "Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient." (Moses 5:11.)
This article is full of valuable information about the relationship between the creation, the Fall, and the Atonement.
__________________
When we Christians behave badly, or fail to behave well, we are making Christianity unbelievable to the outside world. -- C.S. Lewis
Testimony is to know and to feel, conversion is to do and become. -- Dallin H. Oaks
People ask you for criticism, but they only want praise.
W. Somerset Maugham
|

11-02-2009, 12:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 45
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by candyprpl
I just read this wonderful article by Elder Bruce R. McConkie, "Christ and the Creation"
(Ensign, Jun 1982)
In this article he states, "Mortality, and procreation and death had their beginnings with the Fall. One of the most profound doctrinal declarations ever made fell from the lips of mother Eve. She said: "Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient." (Moses 5:11.)
This article is full of valuable information about the relationship between the creation, the Fall, and the Atonement.
|
Book of Moses? That must be BoM? I'm not a Mormon so I think the only discussion I can participate in can be from the Scriptures that we both accept. (IOW, I do not use the deutero-canonical books when I speak with born again Christians, as they do not accept them as inspired)
That said, it sounds like the BoM contradicts what we know from Genesis, so how is that reconciled?
|

11-02-2009, 12:48 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,135 Times in 728 Posts
Laughs: 166
Laughs at 289 Times in 158 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatima
From what do you induce that Eve could not have children in the garden?
|
To reduce candyprpl's excellent post, the answer would be simply "Revelation given to modern prophets".
Quote:
|
God told A and E to "be fruitful and multiply" before the fall, so clearly she could have borne children prior, but didn't for whatever reason.
|
She could have, had she partaken of the fruit (which God had put before her). The conundrum was, He had also told her (at least for the time being) not to partake of the fruit.
Quote:
|
So, then if your theology says that we are "spirit children" in the premortal existence as children of the Heavenly Father and some unnamed heavenly mother, and Jesus is our elder brother, why was Jesus not made by two earthly parents as we are?
|
1. Because no mortal could survive the pain that Jesus had to survive during His Atonement--a full-blooded mortal would have died before that atonement was complete.
2. Because a mortal, alone, would not have power over death--either to raise others (e.g. Lazarus) or Himself from the dead.
__________________
Your lawyer in practice spends a considerable part of his life doing distasteful things for disagreeable people who must be satisfied, against an impossible time limit and with hourly interruptions, from other disagreeable people who want to derail the train; and for his blood, sweat, and tears he receives in the end a few unkind words to the effect that it might have been done better, and a protest at the size of his fee.
--William L. Prosser
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Just_A_Guy For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:29 AM.
|