
01-21-2012, 06:07 PM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 7,818
Thanks: 1,890
Thanked 3,264 Times in 1,840 Posts
Laughs: 1,962
Laughs at 2,114 Times in 1,006 Posts
|
|
Moderator warning:
Be careful about what you post about temple ceremonies. If you have questions relating to a direct ceremony, phrase, or other specific temple ordinance, please go to the temple and inquire there.
__________________
I say that we need to teach our people to find their answers in the scriptures...But the unfortunate thing is that so many of us are not reading the scriptures. We do not know what is in them, and therefore we speculate about things that we ought to have found in the scriptures themselves. I think that therein is one of our biggest dangers of today."
--President Harold B. Lee, December, 1972
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to beefche For This Useful Post:
|
|

01-21-2012, 06:24 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 2,421
Thanks: 981
Thanked 1,119 Times in 701 Posts
Laughs: 56
Laughs at 73 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caitlyn
I've read this many times. How much truth is there in it?
|
A few things were borrowed. All of it was re-defined. Except maybe the 5 points of fellowship, which was borrowed straight across until it was removed in 1990.
HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby
|

01-21-2012, 09:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 425
Thanks: 69
Thanked 260 Times in 148 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HiJolly
A few things were borrowed. All of it was re-defined. Except maybe the 5 points of fellowship, which was borrowed straight across until it was removed in 1990.
HiJolly
|
I beg to differ. There is evidence of this being an ancient practice. I believe this information will be published this summer. Joseph Smith did not have to borrow or steal anything because it was a revealed ordinance from God.
|

01-21-2012, 11:00 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 2,421
Thanks: 981
Thanked 1,119 Times in 701 Posts
Laughs: 56
Laughs at 73 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by livy111us
I beg to differ. There is evidence of this being an ancient practice. I believe this information will be published this summer. Joseph Smith did not have to borrow or steal anything because it was a revealed ordinance from God.
|
Never said it wasn't an ancient practice.
An article written years ago by Arturo de Hoyos lays it out very clearly as to what happened, and in what timeframes. The Freemasons only used it as we did for about (IIRC) 30 years, and then made changes post 1844 that we did not make. So then at that point we were the only ones using it exactly as it had been, only we kept it going unchanged for over 150 years.
HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby
|

01-22-2012, 12:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 425
Thanks: 69
Thanked 260 Times in 148 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
I think there is a disconnect between both camps (ancient for from freemasonry) on the origin of the endowment. I have called many people out after comments that they've made about the endowment coming from masonry, but after discussing the issue, they believe that masonry got it from Christianity or Judaism. Personally, I find it easier to believe and explain to say that the endowment is ancient and the masons borrowed from existing rituals when they came up with their ceremonies a few hundred years ago. I believe it isn't accurate to say that Joseph Smith borrowed from the masons, because both are pulling from an ancient source.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to livy111us For This Useful Post:
|
|

01-22-2012, 04:29 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 193
Thanks: 54
Thanked 70 Times in 52 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I have a very good friend whom is a Freemason and has been for 30 years.
Freemasonry dates back to the patriarch Noah.
Not going to discuss the LDS Temple since we make covenants not to do so.
|

01-22-2012, 06:58 PM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 7,818
Thanks: 1,890
Thanked 3,264 Times in 1,840 Posts
Laughs: 1,962
Laughs at 2,114 Times in 1,006 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jezebel2011
Freemasonry dates back to the patriarch Noah.
|
I've never heard that before. Where do you get that information?
__________________
I say that we need to teach our people to find their answers in the scriptures...But the unfortunate thing is that so many of us are not reading the scriptures. We do not know what is in them, and therefore we speculate about things that we ought to have found in the scriptures themselves. I think that therein is one of our biggest dangers of today."
--President Harold B. Lee, December, 1972
|

01-22-2012, 08:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 2,421
Thanks: 981
Thanked 1,119 Times in 701 Posts
Laughs: 56
Laughs at 73 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jezebel2011
Freemasonry dates back to the patriarch Noah.
|
In Joseph Smith's day, 99% of the Freemason believed this, some even going to Adam for the source of Freemasonry. Today, maybe 10% still believe this, because they don't believe the historical research of the past 100 years or so. Sad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jezebel2011
Not going to discuss the LDS Temple since we make covenants not to do so.
|
You made specific covenants not to reveal certain select portions of the endowment. About maybe 5% of the endowment, or less.
HiJolly
__________________
"All it takes is for us to get a little bit self-important and narrow-minded. Toss in a little fussiness, a bit of dogma, and a bunch of pride and you've got yourself a bunch of people who wouldn't recognize the truth if it sat on them."
-- Robert Kirby
|

01-22-2012, 08:43 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 4,230
Thanks: 4,380
Thanked 1,830 Times in 1,210 Posts
Laughs: 1,291
Laughs at 353 Times in 228 Posts
|
|
Well I dont know what 5 % that might be. ^^ Better to 'err' on the side of caution and maybe not discuss any of them.
|

01-23-2012, 03:27 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 193
Thanks: 54
Thanked 70 Times in 52 Posts
Laughs: 3
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HiJolly
In Joseph Smith's day, 99% of the Freemason believed this, some even going to Adam for the source of Freemasonry. Today, maybe 10% still believe this, because they don't believe the historical research of the past 100 years or so. Sad.
You made specific covenants not to reveal certain select portions of the endowment. About maybe 5% of the endowment, or less.
HiJolly
|
I was told NOT to reveal any of the Endowment to anyone, and I will stick by that.
Nobody revealed any of the Endowment to me prior to my taking it for myself.
I will certainly not discuss any of it with anyone, whether on an internet Forum or not.
If you go into current Freemason history you will find that Noah is behind the practices and beliefs of the Freemasons - that is actual fact. Speak to someone whom is a Freemason and you will find out that it is true. Nothing to do with the history of the LDS Church or JS.
You can look at the Freemasonry's own reference books -
(Mackey, Lexicon of Freemasonry, page 324, 2004, Barnes and Noble Publishing, Inc.)
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:34 AM.
New Posts
|