Quote:
Originally Posted by OneEternalSonata
Could it be that the garment being protective physically isn't taught because the impossibility thereof, but the important knowledge is its spiritual attributes? Surely, the garment saving a life would be important, however, the simple act of wearing it doesn't grant even spiritual protection without faith. When we teach priests about the key of the ministering of angels we don't tell them every possibility this authority holds. Some may have sufficient faith and expedience to see the physical manifestation of angelic hosts, while others may not, even though they be encircled round about. Personal revelation can teach us doctrine that isn't mainstream, yet the exception doesn't refute the rule. Although, exceptions will never break eternal law as much as it may bend policy.
|
Until it is confirmed that it is doctrine of the church, stories like this are best kept out of lessons, talks, activities and anything else church related, otherwise it's exactly the same as spreading myths and rumours which is a dangerous practice.
As I said before, there has been no confirmation that this is doctrine other than stories popping up from members of the church here and there, who hold no official capacity within the church to claim it as doctrine.
Also as I said before, I do not claim to be able to disprove the potential for physical protection by divine intervention due to the wearing of the garments. However, there are hundreds of thousands of rumours spreading around the church, usually caused by some random members "personal revelation" which ends up getting so wide spread that a letter sometimes gets sent out by the first presidency refuting these rumours being church doctrine. We would all be much better off if we had a healthy sense of skepticism. At least it's better than being gullible. This applies to the church just as it does to the world.