Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Social Network Forums > General Discussion Forums > Preserving Marriage between a man and a woman

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2012, 07:19 PM
Martain's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 395
Thanks: 100
Thanked 192 Times in 135 Posts
Laughs: 36
Laughs at 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Since I'd already read this quote earlier today while reading through the Eternal Marriage Student Manual and it quickly came to mind upon reading your question.

The Right Person
President Gordon B. Hinckley

“Be worthy of the mate you choose. Respect him or her. Give encouragement to him or her. Love your companion with all your heart. This will be the most important decision of your life, the individual whom you marry.

“There is no substitute for marrying in the temple. It is the only place under the heavens where marriage can be solemnized for eternity. Don’t cheat yourself. Don’t cheat your companion. Don’t shortchange your lives. Marry the right person in the right place at the right time.

“Choose a companion of your own faith. You are much more likely to be happy. Choose a companion you can always honor, you can always respect, one who will complement you in your own life, one to whom you can give your entire heart, your entire love, your entire allegiance, your entire loyalty. . . .

“. . . I could not wish for any of you more than I have had in my companionship with my beautiful wife.

“A good marriage requires time. It requires effort. You have to work at it. You have to cultivate it. You have to forgive and forget. You have to be absolutely loyal one to another. Most of you will marry and have children. They will become the source of your greatest pride and happiness. . . .

“All of this can come to pass if you make this most important decision, one guided by prayer as well as instinct, of choosing a dear companion who will be yours through thick and thin forever, throughout all eternity” ( “Life’s Obligations,” Ensign, Feb. 1999, 2, 4 ).
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2012, 04:36 PM
log2's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 153
Thanks: 3
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Laughs: 8
Laughs at 18 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bini View Post
Do you considered it "settling for less" when an endowed person marries a non-endowed person?
If I were to do it and not by revelation, then I would be settling for less. However, that is not necessarily the case for anyone else.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2012, 04:45 PM
clarissa's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Endowed vs Not-Endowed

I wouldn't say that they are settling for a lesser PERSON but I would say that marriage in the Temple is the highest, most exalting form of marriage that exists on earth. The person they are marrying may be a wonderful person, but it is sad that they may not choose to be sealed for eternity in the Temple. That says nothing about the worth of the people getting married, though.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2012, 06:35 AM
sunshinewai's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Zealand
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 38
Thanks: 149
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Laughs: 52
Laughs at 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I'm endowed and married to a Non endowed Man.. I don't think of it as settling for less.. rather preparing for the BEST He has the desire to enter the Holy Temple and is on track with preparing to do so, its a blessing to accompany him We are both excited
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2012, 07:23 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 822
Thanks: 260
Thanked 476 Times in 283 Posts
Laughs: 47
Laughs at 144 Times in 70 Posts
Default

Short answer:

No

-RM
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2012, 10:24 AM
IRealtor007's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
Laughs: 1
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Nope. I don't think it's settling for less. ... Just because you each have a temple marriage doesnt mean its going to turn out. Its working together.. Having things in common. To me thats more important. But thats me. I havent been raised in the church my whole life either..
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2012, 11:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 102
Thanks: 109
Thanked 79 Times in 46 Posts
Laughs: 39
Laughs at 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bini View Post
First, this topic is not meant to offend those that are in this situation. Recently, I attended a family wedding where one spouse is endowed and the other is not. I'm very happy for both of them and wish them the best but I do have an overall question as an afterthought that I wanted to toss out there.


Do you considered it "settling for less" when an endowed person marries a non-endowed person?


I see a slight difference between this scenario and a LDS marrying a non-LDS because being a LDS does not necessarily mean that you are endowed. From my understanding, when you become endowed, you are accepting certain responsibilities and are held at a higher ante when sins are committed than those that are not endowed or are non-LDS. I understand we can't choose who we are attracted to but we can choose how we handle that attraction, whether we pursue it or not.
Bini, I agree, this is a great forum to ask these types of questions! For us to give a personal opinion, without attack on anyone.
For me personally, my answer is yes to the question. I'm a "mature" female who has never been married. I have however, before I came back to church, been in a couple of live-in relationships (not the same, I know). As a single, I would not date anyone that is not LDS (although I have had several friends and family members try)...I know, don't say it, but that's my choice.
If the person I was dating/going to marry was not currently endowed, because of new converstion/reactivation, then I would wait till we could marry in the temple.

On your second statement, I disagree, we can choose who we are attracted to.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 AM.

New Posts

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Social Network ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.