Language:
Welcome Guest Login or Signup » LOGOUT

Go Back   LDS Social Network Forums > Organizations > Priesthood Quorums (Aaronic & Melchizedek) & Scouting

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:00 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Garment Wearing

I wonder if other men have the same difficulty with wearing garment bottoms without any additional support.

I find wearing just the authorized garment does not give me much appreciated support; I wear a supportive "brief" under the garment to relieve the desire to frequently "re-adjust."

I just wonder if other men have this experience.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:03 PM
MarginOfError's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 5,528
Thanks: 220
Thanked 4,291 Times in 2,118 Posts
Laughs: 208
Laughs at 1,386 Times in 588 Posts
Default

Nope. Haven't had this problem.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_A_Guy View Post
Dude. When both Vort and MOE are in agreement, the thinking has been done.
Uncommon Dissent
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2010, 09:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 243
Thanks: 124
Thanked 149 Times in 88 Posts
Laughs: 28
Laughs at 19 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Boxer style or brief style? I've been quite happy with the cotton brief style that I get. You might try a different style and see if they fit better.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2010, 08:36 AM
pam's Avatar
pam pam is offline
Head Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 45,386
Thanks: 6,684
Thanked 12,619 Times in 7,675 Posts
Laughs: 3,784
Laughs at 8,906 Times in 4,018 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarginOfError View Post
Nope. Haven't had this problem.
I'm not even going there. Wait..that didn't come out right. I'm not...oh nevermind. You get the idea.
The Following 10 Users Laughed Out Loud when they read pam's Post:
applepansy (10-12-2010), bl8tant (10-16-2010), dash77 (10-11-2010), eternalpromise516 (10-19-2010), FenderFan (10-27-2010), Honor (10-18-2010), miztrniceguy (10-20-2010), SmilingRedhead (10-12-2010), zenbones (01-02-2012), zippy_do46 (10-09-2010)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 12:10 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 299
Thanks: 19
Thanked 38 Times in 34 Posts
Laughs: 15
Laughs at 15 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I have had some problems in this area and I have had another problem with rashes – only when I lived down south in high humidity. Here is what I have learned:

The boxer types that are made to wick away sweat work extremely well in regard to making a certain area of my body cooler and dealing with rashes. However, I do not like the lack of support and find faster movement (such as playing basketball in the driveway) causes discomfort. The cotton briefs do the opposite – they provide good enough support, but increase the heat and sweating in this area – which then contributes to heat rash ) again, when I lived in the south with high humidity).

I have found the new under-armor type to be the best in the summer or in heavy sweating areas (e.g., inside work in the heat). They wick away sweat, keep things cooler, and give good enough support. I still have some support problems – but I think they are the best in regard to your issue and the ones I have had. I usually wear them in the summer and the cotton type (briefs and boxers) in the winter. However, when just hanging out or doing activities that require little fast movement and little sweating (e.g., sitting in a boat fishing in the fall, going to church), I like boxers the most.

KRP5, have you tried the newer under-armor type?
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2010, 04:22 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Laughs: 0
Laughs at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Are you talking about the under-armor brand or is there a "under-armor type of garment?

I have tried the under-armor brand boxer shorts, but I really prefer a brief style to keep everything from moving.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2010, 07:54 PM
john doe's Avatar
Head Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 9,531
Thanks: 1,567
Thanked 3,025 Times in 1,755 Posts
Laughs: 727
Laughs at 1,723 Times in 850 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krp5 View Post
Are you talking about the under-armor brand or is there a "under-armor type of garment?

I have tried the under-armor brand boxer shorts, but I really prefer a brief style to keep everything from moving.

There are support brief type garments available. I bought a pair and decided I don't need that kind of 'support'. Personally, I find these types of threads silly. I wasn't used to hanging free-and-easy when I first started wearing garments, but was used to them by the end of my mission. I had a companion from Kanab, Utah who felt they were too constricting. It seems he rarely wore any underwear at all growing up on the ranch.

I think most people can find a type and style that they can become accustomed to wearing. Some non-members wear boxers just as loose as garments for years and wouldn't think of stuffing themselves into briefs. You eventually figure out how to adjust yourself and your movements without thinking about it and making a big scene or production out of it.
__________________
Pressure: It can turn a lump of coal into a flawless diamond, or an average person into a perfect basketcase.
-from despair.com


Except for ending slavery, fascism, nazism, & communism, WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING!
From protestwarrior.com
The Following User Says Thank You to john doe For This Useful Post:
ryanh (10-13-2010)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2010, 02:52 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 299
Thanks: 19
Thanked 38 Times in 34 Posts
Laughs: 15
Laughs at 15 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Krp5:

I am referring to a new type of garment that was created maybe a year or so ago that is an under-armor type of garment. It fits a lot tighter and has provided me with much better support. Sometimes there might be some discomfort related to a certain body part stuck sideways instead of downward (assuming downward is normal – but who knows) – but I agree with John Doe, there are other ways to adjust yourself that can be helpful (e.g., certain leg movements). I am not sure if I agree with John on learning movements that can prevent problems – but there really are discreet ways to adjust.

May I ask if you are a convert to the church? I am a little surprised that you were not aware of this type of garment.

John:

With my last sentence stated to Krp5, I am not sure I know what you mean by support type brief garments. Are too simply referring to brief style garment bottoms that are snugger?
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2010, 09:08 PM
john doe's Avatar
Head Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 9,531
Thanks: 1,567
Thanked 3,025 Times in 1,755 Posts
Laughs: 727
Laughs at 1,723 Times in 850 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dash77 View Post

John:

With my last sentence stated to Krp5, I am not sure I know what you mean by support type brief garments. Are too simply referring to brief style garment bottoms that are snugger?
No, there are support bottoms available for men. They are much snugger than regular brief-type garments. The one I bought is a slick material and is 79% polyester and 21% spandex.
__________________
Pressure: It can turn a lump of coal into a flawless diamond, or an average person into a perfect basketcase.
-from despair.com


Except for ending slavery, fascism, nazism, & communism, WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING!
From protestwarrior.com
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2010, 09:53 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: United States -
Religion: Mormon / LDS / Christian
Posts: 299
Thanks: 19
Thanked 38 Times in 34 Posts
Laughs: 15
Laughs at 15 Times in 9 Posts
Default

John:

I think the type you are refering to is the under-armour type I have been suggesting. I think we are refering to the same type of garment. I like the support.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 PM.

New Posts

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0



TERMS & CONDITIONS | HELP | CONTACT US | INVITE | RSS FEEDS | ABOUT US | GET INVOLVED | ARCHIVE
*** LDS Social Network ***
More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.