"Anti-Nephi-Lehi" by Alan C. Miner

[Hemidakota]

[e-mail]

Excerpts from Step by Step Through the Book of Mormon (unpublished) by Alan C. Miner and by the noted contributing authors

In the missionary account of the sons of Mosiah we learn that the Lamanite people converted by Ammon and his brethren take upon them the name of "Anti-Nephi-Lehi" (Alma 23:17). The reader should note that the name is not "Lehi-Nephi" like the city that Zeniff inherited, but "Nephi-Lehi." The question one might ask is, Why this name? What significance does this name have?

It seems that Anti-Nephi-Lehi was the brother of Lamoni and because of their father's death, was now the current king (Alma 24:3). Apparently, Anti-Nephi-Lehi was sympathetic to Ammon's cause (Alma 24:5) and the people might have either taken on his name of their own accord or he had given the people his name (possibly in some connection with rights, freedoms, or privileges that they were allowed). The reader should note that in Alma 24:23-27 not only did the converts refuse to take up their swords, but they also were commanded by their king not to, and it so impressed the other pure Lamanites that they not only stopped their killing, but were converted also.

It is significant that "the people of Anti-Nephi-Lehi" (Alma 27:25) are never referred to by this name again after they settle with the Nephites, but by the name "the people of Ammon" (Alma 27:26). If Anti-Nephi-Lehi was originally king Lamoni's brother, the people of Anti-Nephi-Lehi probably depended on him as a patron or mediator for their existence and security while in the land of Nephi. Once these people entered the land of Zarahemla, they needed another patron or mediator, and Ammon was apparently that person. [Alan C. Miner, Personal Notes]

Kent P. Jackson and Darrell L Matthews
The Anti-Nephi-Lehies obeyed the law of Moses, believing that it was a type of Christ's coming. (Alma 25:15) Obeying the law strengthened their faith in Christ: "They did keep the law of Moses; . . . for it was not all fulfilled. But notwithstanding the law of Moses, they did look forward to the coming of Christ, considering that the law of Moses was a type of his coming, and believing that they must keep those outward performances until the time that he should be revealed unto them. Now they did not suppose that salvation came by the law of Moses; but the law of Moses did serve to strengthen their faith in Christ; and thus they did retain a hope through faith, unto eternal salvation, relaying upon the spirit of prophecy, which spake of those things to come." (Alma 25:15-16)

This is one of the finest statements in the scriptures about the role of the law of Moses as a "type," a symbol or pattern, of the mission of Christ. [Kent P. Jackson and Darrell L. Matthews, "The Lamanite Converts Firm in the Faith," in Studies in Scripture: Book of Mormon, Part 1, pp. 337-339]

Brant Gardner
One of the more famous stories from the Book of Mormon is the inspiring courage of the Anti-Nephi-Lehies who lay down their lives for the gospel rather than pick up arms against their brethren (see Alma 23:16-2 Brant Gardner 5:2). According to Brant Gardner, this is a great story, but it is replete with problems. The greatest problem that the story presents is the tremendous contrast between the apparent exaltation of pacifism in this story and the very clear contradiction of that principle in the rest of the Book of Mormon. How is it that pacifism should be so important for the Anti-Nephi-Lehies, but unimportant for the Nephites, who readily take up arms in self-defense? How is it that the principle should be so strong for only a single generation of Anti-Nephi-Lehies, since their sons will take up arms in defense of their new country?

In Alma 24:9-10, either Lamoni or Anti-Nephi-Lehi states: "I also thank my God, that by opening this correspondence [with these brethren the Nephites] we have been convinced of our sins, and of the many murders which we have committed. And I also thank my God, yea, my great God, that he hath granted unto us that we might repent of these things, and also that he hath forgiven us of those our many sins and murders which we have committed . . ."

The readers should note that the particular sin is "murder." It is a sin that all of the people of Anti-Nephi-Lehi apparently accept, even the women and children over a certain age. When had they committed murder? In battle, the casualties are rarely termed murder, and even if we accept that these deaths in battle constituted murder, what of the women and the older children? Why were they under the same condemnation, but the younger children were not?

The answer lies in both the Mesoamerican politico-religious context of the cult of war, and the phrase "since it has been all that we could do, (as we were the most lost of all mankind) to repent of --- the many murders" (Alma 24:11). This was a people whose conception of the world was built around the idea that human blood was required by the gods for the continuation of the world. It is hard for modern readers to understand the depth of change that it would entail for someone with that worldview to change to an acceptance of the gospel. It required not only a change of religion, but a change of science, a change of cosmology. Their very understanding of the mechanics of the universe had to change. No wonder it was so hard for them to change. Seeing the world through the eyes of the gospel, it is no wonder that they would have seen the human sacrifices of the cult of war as murders, and that their participation in that religion and worldview would have stained all, even the women and the children old enough to have been indoctrinated into this worldview. When the Anti-Nephi-Lehies lay down their arms, it is not out of any principle of pacifism, but one of fear of reversion to their old ways. Like reformed alcoholics, their best chance to maintain their new convictions was to stay far away from the feelings and attitudes of the old way. [Brant Gardner, "A Social History of the Early Nephites," delivered at the FAIR Conference, August 17, 2001, pp. 12-13]

[Traveler]

The brother of Lamoni was given the name Anti-Nephi-Lehi by his father after the conversion of the people. Most likely this was a “king” or coronation name similar to “Nephi” that was the name of the Nephite kings. The name means not descendant of Nephi descendant of Lehi. It is important to note how peoples were named and governed by law (covenant) and that when the Anti-Nephi-Lehi name was droped they were called “the people of” Ammon. This is interesting because Ammon was the son of Mosiah and had right to claim to be king among the Nephits. But since they were not called the Ammonites this indicates something different in their covenant as opposed to the Nephits.

All of this follows the ancient order of kingdoms among the Hebrews that were called Israelites when there were kings in Israel and the children of Israel, sons of Israel or people of Israel before there were kings.

Something else that is interesting is that the G-d establishes a different covenant among his people based on the political order – if there are Kings or Judges over the people. I have stated that most Christians of our modern era do not understand covenants and so none of this will make sense to them – nor do they understand the effect these different covenants had on the church and how the church is organized. Also most Christians do not understand what their status will be in heaven – if G-d will be their king or if he will be their judge. There is a difference according to the law or covenant and the responsibility and role of citizens.

The Traveler

[VisionOfLehi]

I have been taught that at the time of the translation by Joseph, "Anti" meant "to mimic" and not just "opposed"

So it would mean they were mimicking Nephi and Lehi, so to speak.

[Traveler]

Originally Posted by VisionOfLehi

I have been taught that at the time of the translation by Joseph, "Anti" meant "to mimic" and not just "opposed"

So it would mean they were mimicking Nephi and Lehi, so to speak.

For clearification of the term "Anti" see Alma30:6.

The Traveler

[VisionOfLehi]

means “against” or “in place of.” Antichrist, therefore, may refer generally to any apostate teacher who is against Christ or who claims to be Christ (Matt. 24:23-24; 1 John 2:18; 4:3). The Antichrist refers to the final and horrible world ruler of the Tribulation. ...

emphasis added

[Moksha]

Originally Posted by VisionOfLehi

I have been taught that at the time of the translation by Joseph, "Anti" meant "to mimic" and not just "opposed"

So it would mean they were mimicking Nephi and Lehi, so to speak.

So in the fullness of time, will we see that anti-mormons where just mimicking Mormons as a matter of praise?