|
|
You are not logged into the site. Please login or signup.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the LDS.net forums. If you are a member of LDS.net, please login now. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|

10-23-2008, 09:14 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,945
Thanks: 3,060
Thanked 2,529 Times in 1,833 Posts
Laughs: 494
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
|
|
Testing Book of Mormon geography theories
MormonTimes - Testing Book of Mormon geography theories
Article snippet: "There is a group of people who consider that everything took place in Peru," Carr said. "Others (think it took place) right around the Isthmus of Panama. Others in Mesoamerica. Others in (the) New York state, Eastern United States, Great Lakes area. And then there is the overall pervading idea that came back from the early days in the church that it was the entire Western Hemisphere -- from Tierra del Fuego to Point Barrow, Alaska."
|

10-23-2008, 07:51 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 3,065
Thanks: 410
Thanked 1,037 Times in 626 Posts
Laughs: 27
Laughs at 55 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Yeah, lots of good theories out there. One thing to note that by the time Christ visited the Nephites, the entire civilization was already 600 years old. How quickly was America settled? We're barely over 200 years old. I replied to your other thread with a link and a website of some interesting images and discoveries.
__________________
"No unhallowed hand can stop the work from progressing; persecutions may rage, mobs may combine, armies may assemble, calumny may defame, but the truth of God will go forth boldly, nobly, and independent, till it has penetrated every continent, visited every clime, swept every country, and sounded in every ear, till the purposes of God shall be accomplished, and the Great Jehovah shall say the work is done" (History of the Church, 4:540).
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to skalenfehl For This Useful Post:
|
|

10-24-2008, 12:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 4,307
Thanks: 755
Thanked 2,034 Times in 1,159 Posts
Laughs: 264
Laughs at 464 Times in 295 Posts
|
|
While we have an idea of Nephite territory, such as travels through the entire land that take less than 2 weeks (suggesting a distance of maybe 250 miles for the Nephite Empire), we do not know the extent of the Lamanite lands.
Another issue is the concept of cultural adoption. Both sides did it, as we see Nephites adopting the Ammonites, Mulekites, and others groups. Lamanites adopted several Nephite apostate groups, and perhaps other groups that were non-Nephite in origin. The term "Lamanite" eventually came to mean anyone who did not culturally affiliate with the Nephites. That could potentially mean a western hemispheric model for the Lamanites, even though the core Lamanites (by birth and tradition) were perhaps in an equally small area as the Nephites.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rameumptom For This Useful Post:
|
|

02-15-2009, 07:25 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 183
Thanks: 15
Thanked 43 Times in 31 Posts
Laughs: 15
Laughs at 19 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
This is an old thread but I saw it and had to enter my personal thoughts, The nephites had to have landed on the western coast of America/South America, they traveled east from Jerusalem for 9 years was it? that is definitely long enough to travel across all of asia. I personally believe that they traveled from asia to the americas and that asia had the gospel a long time ago. Therefore in order for them to get to New York for Moroni to bury the plates the civilization may have expanded throughout the entire continent/s.
|

02-15-2009, 07:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 4,307
Thanks: 755
Thanked 2,034 Times in 1,159 Posts
Laughs: 264
Laughs at 464 Times in 295 Posts
|
|
The Nephites traveled to Arabian peninsula, where they built a ship and sailed the rest of the way, with the trade currents to the western shores of the Americas. The Jaredites may have gone either direction (west or east), as I've seen good evidence for both.
The internal textual clues of the Book of Mormon definitely show that the Nephites, during their 1000 year history, did not cover more than a 400 square mile area. Distances between the Lamanite lands and the Land of Desolation (about 2 weeks travel) is too short for a continental or hemispheric theory.
Other groups were already here. DNA and the textual clues in the Book of Mormon already witness to this. The modern Native Americans are therefore primarily cultural descendants of the Lamanites.
|

02-17-2009, 08:12 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 435
Thanked 492 Times in 285 Posts
Laughs: 57
Laughs at 246 Times in 126 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rameumptom
The modern Native Americans are therefore primarily cultural descendants of the Lamanites.
|
The problem with this idea is that it conflicts with what the Prophets have taught. Not to mention the Lamanite placement program.
|

02-17-2009, 09:04 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 11,945
Thanks: 3,060
Thanked 2,529 Times in 1,833 Posts
Laughs: 494
Laughs at 265 Times in 185 Posts
|
|
Which prophets and why?
__________________
"Moving Forward...together!"
|

02-17-2009, 11:11 AM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 4,307
Thanks: 755
Thanked 2,034 Times in 1,159 Posts
Laughs: 264
Laughs at 464 Times in 295 Posts
|
|
I agree with Hemi. Some prophets have given their opinions in the past as to literal descendancy. But based upon what? Elder McConkie had placed in the 1981 BoM introduction the concept that the Lamanites were the "principle" ancestor of the Native Americans. That was recently removed, as we move past the Mormon Doctrine era, and into an era with more understanding of BoM textual criticism and other evidences.
The Book of Mormon shows cultural ties as the most important ties. Mulekites become Nephites. Nephites become Lamanites. Zoramites and Amulonites become Lamanites or Nephites. Others are absorbed as needed. How else did Nephi build a temple the size of Solomon's, if he only had his own family to build it? Reality shows that they had absorbed others, just as Mosiah later absorbed the Mulekites. Suddenly, DNA becomes meaningless, as other distinct peoples become part of the group and use the group label.
|

02-17-2009, 11:12 AM
|
 |
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United States -
Age: 50
Posts: 4,307
Thanks: 755
Thanked 2,034 Times in 1,159 Posts
Laughs: 264
Laughs at 464 Times in 295 Posts
|
|
BTW, I don't understand how the Lamanite Placement program becomes a problem for my statement. We placed cultural Lamanites into white homes.
|

02-17-2009, 11:14 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States -
Posts: 602
Thanks: 46
Thanked 248 Times in 145 Posts
Laughs: 30
Laughs at 134 Times in 74 Posts
|
|
I've never understood the point of these endeavors. The Book of Mormon wasn't meant to be a geography book.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to LittleWyvern For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
New Posts
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 PM.
|