This is not an official website of the LDS Church.
 
Language:
Please Donate
Welcome Guest Login or Signup
Groups >> Early Mormon History >> Forum >> I'm surprised


Page:  1 | 2 | Next >  Last >>

Viewing 1 - 9 out of 10 posts



POSTED BY: esozeph on Feb 20, 2008
I'm surprised
Wow, I'm surprised that no one has started any groups for discussing LDS church history ... I wonder why this is, perhaps it is because it is viewed as boring -- or too controversial for some members ... hmmm ... ??
Back To Top



POSTED BY: melissar on Mar 16, 2008
I would like to learn more about church history.
Back To Top



POSTED BY: MaidservantX on May 6, 2008

Thanks for starting one.





--------------------------------------------------------------
"A real garden, where one can enter and forget the whole world, cannot be made in a week or a month or a year. It must be planned for, and waited for, and loved into being." Chinese Proverb
Back To Top



POSTED BY: Neues_Deutschland on Jul 2, 2008

A lot of ppl I've met don't know a lot about LDS history, or won't believe some facts even if it's written in their seven volume HC. Some don't even know that Old Joe practiced plural marriages. No wonder if you look for information on the Church's website





--------------------------------------------------------------
This is the place!
Back To Top



POSTED BY: california_ave on Jul 9, 2008

There are different kinds of history about the church:

  1. There is the George A. Smith/Joseph Fielding Smith/Boyd K. Packer history whose main goal is to promote faith (while sometimes distorting/altering the record).  This is the CES/Sunday school version of history
  2. On the other end of the spectrum is the Eber Howe/Ed Decker history whose goal is to make money or satisy a vindetta (while distorting the record)
  3. Somewhere in betweeen.  The ideal attempts to be true to the records, understanding there are contradictions, and being satisfied that not all questions may be answered.
Back To Top



POSTED BY: InTheDoghouse on Jul 10, 2008

I would like to consider myself falling into the catagory of the third group.  There is so many interesting things to be learned from our past, and some just have to be taken on faith!





--------------------------------------------------------------
Go and check out this new great Blog...http://kooldsgirlz.blogspot.com/
Back To Top



POSTED BY: Neues_Deutschland on Jul 11, 2008
I like categories...

I would split category 3 in two or even three sub categories:

  • History written by open-minded scholars like Richard L Bushman, B H Roberts who try to conduct honest, balanced research, but show some respect for the faithful and remain loyal to their church
  • Then you have closet doubters like D Michael Quinn, Grant H Palmer whose writings & unorthodox conclusions had brought them in some serious trouble with their church
  • The last faction comprises former adherents who turned so-called anti or skeptic. I have in mind names like Dan Vogel, Fawn M Brodie...






--------------------------------------------------------------
This is the place!
Back To Top



POSTED BY: california_ave on Jul 16, 2008

Elder Oaks has a good article on reading/interpreting/teaching church history that was given to CES folk ~20 years ago.  I find it a good read.

Back To Top



POSTED BY: tammyi on Jul 31, 2008
no lies

want to learn the history with no one telling lies about it.


 Let us choice if we want to believe it or not.


Honest is the best way.

Back To Top
Nov 20, 2008

Page:  1 | 2 | Next >  Last >>



*** LDS Mormon Network ***
LANGUAGE:

Header art used by permission of Mark Mabry and Reflections of Christ.

LDS.net is provided as a free service, without advertising, to help people of all faiths learn about the Church. If you enjoy this service, please help us continue to provide this service by making a donation. We depend on your help.

More Good Foundation. All rights reserved.

LDS.Net is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon Church or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the More Good Foundation. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org and Mormon.org.